Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:44:09.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Presidents, Congress, and the Use of Force

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2005

William G. Howell  and
Jon C. Pevehouse
William G. Howell
Affiliation:
William G. Howell is Assistant Professor of Government at Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts. He can be reached at whowell@latte.harvard.edu.
Jon C. Pevehouse
Affiliation:
Jon C. Pevehouse is Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. He can be reached at pevehous@polisci.wisc.edu.
Get access

Abstract

Scholars have long debated the relative influence of domestic and international factors on the presidential use of force. On one matter, however, consensus reigns: the U.S. Congress is presumed irrelevant. This presumption, we demonstrate, does not hold up to empirical scrutiny. Using a variety of measures and models, we show a clear connection between the partisan composition of Congress and the quarterly frequency of major uses of force between 1945 and 2000; we do not find any congressional influence, however, on minor uses of force. We recommend that the quantitative use-of-force literature in international relations begin to take seriously theories of domestic political institutions, partisanship, and interbranch relations that have been developed within American politics.We thank the Center for American Political Studies, the Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, and the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation for financial support; and Doug Kriner, Matthew Scherbarth, and Kevin Warnke for research assistance. David Canon, Matt Dickinson, Ben Fordham, David Lewis, and Alastair Smith provided helpful feedback. We also benefited from seminars at the University of Iowa, Princeton University, Harvard University, Ohio State University, and Emory University. Two anonymous reviewers provided excellent feedback. Standard disclaimers apply.

Type
RESEARCH NOTES
Information
International Organization , Volume 59 , Issue 1 , January 2005 , pp. 209 - 232
Copyright
© 2005 The IO Foundation and Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Auerswald, David. 1999. Inward Bound: Domestic Institutions and Military Conflicts. International Organization 53 (3):469–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auerswald, David. 2000. Disarmed Democracies: Domestic Institutions and the Use of Force. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Auerswald, David, and Peter Cowhey. 1997. Ballotbox Diplomacy: The War Powers Resolution and the Use of Force. International Studies Quarterly 41 (3):505–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, William D., and John R. Oneal. 2001. Patriotism or Opinion Leadership? The Nature and Origins of the “Rally 'Round the Flag” Effect. Journal of Conflict Resolution 45 (5):661–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, Matthew. 2002. The Constituent Foundations of the Rally-Round-the-Flag Phenomenon. International Studies Quarterly 46 (2):263–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, W. Lance. 1990. Toward a Theory of Press-State Relations in the United States. Journal of Communication 40 (2):103–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, W. Lance, and Jarol Manheim. 1993. Taking the Public by Storm: Information, Cuing, and the Democratic Process in the Gulf Conflict. Political Communication 10:331–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binder, Sarah. 2003. Stalemate: Causes and Consequences of Legislative Gridlock. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Blechman, Barry. 1990. The Politics of National Security: Congress and U.S. Defense Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Blechman, Barry, and Stephen Kaplan. 1978. Force Without War: U.S. Armed Forces as a Political Instrument. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Brady, David, Joseph Cooper, and Patricia Hurley. 1979. The Decline of Party in the U.S. House of Representatives: 1887–1968. Legislative Studies Quarterly 4 (3):381–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, Richard. 1991. Assessing the President: The Media, Elite Opinion, and Public Support. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Campbell, James. 1986. Presidential Coattails and Midterm Losses in State Legislative Elections. American Political Science Review 80 (1):45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, James, and Joe Sumners, 1990. Presidential Coattails in Senate Elections. American Political Science Review 84 (2):513–524.Google Scholar
Canes-Wrone, Brandice. Forthcoming. Who Leads Whom? The Policy Effects of Presidents' Relationship with the Masses. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Coleman, John. 1999. Unified Government, Divided Government, and Party Responsiveness. American Political Science Review 93 (4):821–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary, and Matthew McCubbins. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Crawford, Vincent, and Joel Sobel. 1982. Strategic Information Transmission. Econometrica 50 (6):1431–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeRouen, Karl. 1995. The Indirect Link: Politics, the Economy, and the Use of Force. Journal of Conflict Resolution 39 (4):671–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeRouen, Karl. 2000. Presidents and the Diversionary Use of Force: A Research Note. International Studies Quarterly 44 (2):317–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, George. 2003. On Deaf Ears: The Limits of the Bully Pulpit. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
Fisher, Louis. 1995. Presidential War Power. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
Fisher, Louis. 2000. Congressional Abdication on War and Spending. College Station: Texas A&M Press.
Fordham, Benjamin. 1998a. The Politics of Threat Perception and the Use of Force: A Political Economy Model of U.S. Uses of Force, 1949–1994. International Studies Quarterly 42 (3):567–590.Google Scholar
Fordham, Benjamin. 1998b. Partisanship, Macroeconomic Policy, and U.S. Uses of Force, 1949–1994. Journal of Conflict Resolution 42 (4):418–39.Google Scholar
Fordham, Benjamin. 2002. Another Look at ‘Parties, Voters, and the Use of Force Abroad.’ Journal of Conflict Resolution 46 (4):572–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fordham, Benjamin, and Christopher Sarver. 2001. Militarized Interstate Disputes and United States Uses of Force. International Studies Quarterly 45 (3):455–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaubatz, Kurt T. 1991. Election Cycles and War. Journal of Conflict Resolution 35 (2):212–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghosn, Faten, and Glenn Palmer. 2003. Codebook for the Militarized Interstate Dispute Data, Version 3.0. Available at <http://cow2.la.psu.edu>. Accessed 15 September 2004.
Gilligan, Thomas W., and Keith Krehbiel. 1990. Organization of Informative Committees by a Rational Legislature. American Journal of Political Science 34 (2):531–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowa, Joanne. 1998. Politics at the Water's Edge: Parties, Voters and the Use of Force Abroad. International Organization 52 (2):307–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowa, Joanne. 1999. Ballots and Bullets: The Elusive Democratic Peace. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Grimmett, Richard. 2001. Congressional Use of Funding Cutoffs Since 1970 Involving U.S. Military Forces and Overseas Deployments. Code RS20775. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.
Hinckley, Barbara. 1994. Less Than Meets the Eye: Foreign Policy Making the Myth of the Assertive Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Howell, William. 2003. Power without Persuasion: The Politics of Direct Presidential Action. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Howell, William, Scott Adler, Charles Cameron, and Charles Riemann. 2000. Divided Government and the Legislative Productivity of Congress, 1945–1994. Legislative Studies Quarterly 25 (2):285–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huth, Paul, and Todd Allee. 2003. The Democratic Peace and Territorial Conflict in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
James, Patrick, and John Oneal. 1991. The Influence of Domestic and International Politics on the President's Use of Force. Journal of Conflict Resolution 35 (2):307–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Patrick, and Jean Rioux. 1998. International Crises and Linkage Politics: The Experiences of the US, 1953–1994. Political Research Quarterly 51 (3):781–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Daniel, Stuart Bremer, and J. David Singer. 1996. Militarized Interstate Disputes, 1816–1992: Rationale, Coding Rules, and Empirical Patterns. Conflict Management and Peace Science 15 (2):163–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary. 1998. Unifying Political Methodology: The Likelihood Theory of Statistical Influence. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Krause, George, and Jeffrey Cohen. 2000. Opportunity, Constraints, and the Development of the Institutional Presidency: The Case of Executive Order Issuance, 1939–1996. Journal of Politics 62 (1):88–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1991. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Krehbiel, Keith. 1993. Where's the Party? British Journal of Political Science 23 (2):235–66.Google Scholar
Lewis, David. 2003. Presidents and the Politics of Agency Design: Political Insulation in the United States Government Bureaucracy, 1946–1997. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Lindsay, James. 1994. Congress and the Politics of U.S. Foreign Policy. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Lindsay, James. 2003. Deference and Defiance: The Shifting Rhythms of Executive-Legislative Relations in Foreign Policy. Presidential Studies Quarterly 33 (3):530–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsay, James, and Randall Ripley. 1993. How Congress Influences Foreign and Defense Policy. In Congress Resurgent: Foreign and Defense Policy on Capitol Hill, edited by Randall Ripley and James Lindsay, 17–45. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Lupia, Arthur, and Mathew McCubbins. 1994. Who Controls? Information and the Structure of Legislative Decision Making. Legislative Studies Quarterly 19 (3):361–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, Edward. 1994. Power, Trade, and War. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Mayer, Kenneth. 2001. With the Stroke of a Pen: Executive Orders and Presidential Power. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Mayhew, David. 1991. Divided We Govern: Party Control Lawmaking and Investigations, 1946–1990. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
Meernik, James. 1993. Presidential Support in Congress: Conflict and Consensus on Foreign and Defense Policy. Journal of Politics 55 (3):569–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meernik, James. 1994. Presidential Decision Making and the Political Use of Force. International Studies Quarterly 38 (1):121–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meernik, James, and Peter Waterman. 1996. The Myth of the Diversionary Use of Force by American Presidents. Political Research Quarterly 49 (3):573–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mermin, Jonathan. 1999. Debating War and Peace: Media Coverage of U.S. Intervention in the Post-Vietnam Era. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin, and Will Moore. 2002. Presidential Uses of Force During the Cold War: Aggregation, Truncation, and Temporal Dynamics. American Journal of Political Science 46 (2):438–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Will, and David J. Lanoue. 2003. Domestic Politics and US Foreign Policy: A Study of Cold War Conflict Behavior. Journal of Politics 65 (2):376–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, T. Clifton, and Kenneth Bickers. 1992. Domestic Discontent and the External Use of Force. Journal of Conflict Resolution 36 (1):25–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, T. Clifton, and Sally Campbell. 1991. Domestic Structure, Decisional Constraint, and War: So Why Kant Democracies Fight? Journal of Conflict Resolution 35 (2):187–211.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Charles, and Brian Job. 1986. The President and the Political Use of Force. American Political Science Review 80 (2):541–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Paul. 1994. The President's Dominance in Foreign Policy Making. Political Science Quarterly 109 (2):215–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, Diana, T. Clifton Morgan, Rick Wilson, Valarie Schwebach, and Garry Young. 1993. Good Times, Bad Times, and the Diversionary Use of Force: A Tale of Some Not-So-Free Agents. Journal of Conflict Resolution 37 (3):504–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudalevige, Andrew. 2002. Managing the President's Program: Presidential Leadership and Legislative Policy Formulation. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Schlesinger, Arthur. 1989. The Imperial Presidency. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Schultz, Kenneth. 1998. Domestic Opposition and Signaling in International Crises. American Political Science Review 92 (4):829–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, J. David, and Melvin Small. 1990. National Material Capabilities Database, 1816–1985. [computer file] (study no. 9903). Ann Arbor, Mich.: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 1993. <www.icpsr.umich.edu>.
Smith, Alastair. 1998. International Crises and Domestic Politics. American Political Science Review 92 (3):623–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittkopf, Eugene, and Mark Dehaven. 1987. Soviet Behavior, Presidential Popularity, and the Penetration of Open Political Systems: A Diachronic Analysis. In New Directions in the Study of Foreign Policy, edited by Charles Hermann, Charles Kegley, and James Rosenau, 433–53. Boston: Allen & Unwin.
Zelikow, Philip. 1987. The United States and the Use of Force: A Historical Summary. In Democracy, Strategy, and Vietnam, edited by George K. Osborn, Asa A. Clark IV, Daniel J. Kaufman, and Douglas E. Lute, 31–81. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.
Zorn, Christopher. 2001. Generalized Estimating Equation Models for Correlated Data: A Review with Applications. American Journal of Political Science 45 (2):470–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar