Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T12:17:14.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tariffs As Electoral Weapons: The Political Geography of the US–China Trade War

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2021

Sung Eun Kim Open the ORCID record for Sung Eun Kim [Opens in a new window]  and
Yotam Margalit Open the ORCID record for Yotam Margalit [Opens in a new window]
Get access

Abstract

In response to President Trump instigating conflict over trade with China, the Chinese government countered by issuing tariffs on thousands of products worth over USD 110 billion in US exports. We explore whether China's tariffs reflected a strategy to apply counterpressure by hurting political support for the president's party. We also assess the strategy's impact on the 2018 midterm elections and examine the mechanism underlying the resulting electoral shift. We find strong evidence that Chinese tariffs systematically targeted US goods that had production concentrated in Republican-supporting counties, particularly when located in closely contested Congressional districts. This apparent strategy was successful: targeted areas were more likely to turn against Republican candidates. Using data on campaign communications, local search patterns online, and an original national survey, we find evidence that voters residing in areas affected by the tariffs were more likely to learn about the trade war, recognize its adverse impact, and assign the Republicans responsibility for the escalating dispute. These findings demonstrate how domestic political institutions can be a source of vulnerability in interstate disputes.

Keywords

Trade warelectionretaliatory tariffs
Type
Research Article
Information
International Organization , Volume 75 , Issue 1 , Winter 2021 , pp. 1 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amiti, Mary, Redding, Stephen J., and Weinstein, David E.. 2019. The Impact of the 2018 Tariffs on Prices and Welfare. Journal of Economic Perspectives 33 (4):187–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ardanaz, Martin, Murillo, M. Victoria, and Pinto, Pablo M.. 2013. Sensitivity to Issue Framing on Trade Policy Preferences: Evidence from a Survey Experiment. International Organization 67 (2):411–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Autor, David, Dorn, David, Hanson, Gordon, and Majlesi, Kaveh. 2016. A Note on the Effect of Rising Trade Exposure on the 2016 Presidential Election. Working Paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Blanchard, Emily J., Bown, Chad P., and Chor, Davin. 2019. Did Trump's Trade War Impact the 2018 Election? Technical report. NBER Working Paper No. 26434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Che, Yi, Lu, Yi, Pierce, Justin R., Schott, Peter K., and Tao, Zhigang. 2016. Does Trade Liberalization with China Influence US Elections? NBER Working Paper No. 22178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chyzh, Olga V., and Urbatsch, Robert. 2020. Bean Counters: The Effect of Soy Tariffs on Change in Republican Vote Share between the 2016 and 2018 Elections. The Journal of Politics. Available at <https://doi.org/10.1086/709434>.Google Scholar
Colantone, Italo, and Stanig, Piero. 2018a. Global Competition and Brexit. American Political Science Review 112 (2):201–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colantone, Italo, and Stanig, Piero. 2018b. The Trade Origins of Economic Nationalism: Import Competition and Voting Behavior in Western Europe. American Journal of Political Science 62 (4):936–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drezner, Daniel W. 2011. Sanctions Sometimes Smart: Targeted Sanctions in Theory and Practice. International Studies Review 13 (1):96–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fajgelbaum, Pablo D., Goldberg, Pinelopi K., Kennedy, Patrick J., and Khandelwal, Amit K.. 2020. The Return to Protectionism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 135 (1):1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feigenbaum, James J., and Hall, Andrew B.. 2015. How Legislators Respond to Localized Economic Shocks: Evidence from Chinese Import Competition. The Journal of Politics 77 (4):1012–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Thiemo, and Schwarz, Carlo. 2019. Tariffs and Politics: Evidence from Trump's Trade Wars. CESifo Working Papers. Available at SSRN: <https://ssrn.com/abstract=3349000>..' href=https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3349000>CrossRef.' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Fetzer,+Thiemo,+and+Schwarz,+Carlo.+2019.+Tariffs+and+Politics:+Evidence+from+Trump's+Trade+Wars.+CESifo+Working+Papers.+Available+at+SSRN:+.>Google Scholar
Fordham, Benjamin O., and Kleinberg, Katja B.. 2012. How Can Economic Interests Influence Support for Free Trade? International Organization 66 (2):311–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabel, Matthew, and Scheve, Kenneth. 2007. Estimating the Effect of Elite Communications on Public Opinion Using Instrumental Variables. American Journal of Political Science 51 (4):1013–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, Gene M., and Helpman, Elhanan. 1994. Protection for Sale. The American Economic Review 84 (4):833–50.Google Scholar
Grossman, Gene M., and Helpman, Elhanan. 2002. Interest Groups and Trade Policy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Guisinger, Alexandra. 2009. Determining Trade Policy: Do Voters Hold Politicians Accountable? International Organization 63 (3):533–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guisinger, Alexandra. 2017. American Opinion on Trade: Preferences Without Politics. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, Raymond, Milner, Helen V., and Tingley, Dustin. 2013. Trade Policy, Economic Interests, and Party Politics in a Developing Country: The Political Economy of CAFTA-DR. International Studies Quarterly 58 (1):106–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, Douglas. 2017. Peddling Protectionism: Smoot-Hawley and the Great Depression. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, J. Bradford, Quinn, Dennis P., and Weymouth, Stephen. 2017. Winners and Losers in International Trade: The Effects on US Presidential Voting. International Organization 71 (3):423–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Sung Eun, and Margalit, Yotam. 2017. Informed Preferences? The Impact of Unions on Workers’ Policy Views. American Journal of Political Science 61 (3):728–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kono, Daniel Y. 2006. Optimal Obfuscation: Democracy and Trade Policy Transparency. American Political Science Review 100 (3):369–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Su-Hyun. 2017. Party Competition and the Inter-Industry Structure of US Trade Protection. Political Science Research and Methods 5 (3):489–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D., Milner, Helen V., and Rosendorff, B. Peter. 2000. Free to Trade: Democracies, Autocracies, and International Trade. American Political Science Review 94 (2):305–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D., Milner, Helen V., and Rosendorff, B. Peter. 2002. Why Democracies Cooperate More: Electoral Control and International Trade Agreements. International Organization 56 (3):477–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margalit, Yotam. 2011. Costly Jobs: Trade-related Layoffs, Government Compensation, and Voting in US Elections. American Political Science Review 105 (1):166–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, Judith A., O'Brien, Anthony Patrick, and Callahan, Colleen M.. 1997. Trade Wars: Canada's Reaction to the Smoot-Hawley Tariff. The Journal of Economic History 57 (4):802–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGillivray, Fiona. 1997. Party Discipline As a Determinant of the Endogenous Formation of Tariffs. American Journal of Political Science 41 (2):584–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGillivray, Fiona. 2004. Privileging Industry: The Comparative Politics of Trade and Industrial Policy. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naoi, Megumi, and Kume, Ikuo. 2015. Workers or Consumers? A Survey Experiment on the Duality of Citizens’ Interests in the Politics of Trade. Comparative Political Studies 48 (10):1293–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, Quynh. 2018. Taking a Step Back: Economic Performance and Issue Salience of International Trade Policy. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 31 (1):25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rho, Sungmin, and Tomz, Michael. 2017. Why Don't Trade Preferences Reflect Economic Self-Interest? International Organization 71 (S1):S85–S108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogowski, Ronald. 1989. Commerce and Coalitions: How Trade Affects Domestic Political Alignments. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Lena Maria, and Spilker, Gabriele. 2019. Self-interest Versus Sociotropic Considerations: An Information-based Perspective to Understanding Individuals’ Trade Preferences. Review of International Political Economy 26 (6):1266–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schott, Peter K. 2007. The Relative Sophistication of Chinese Exports. Economic Policy 23 (53):5–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Timothy W. 2015. The Electoral Salience of Trade Policy: Experimental Evidence on the Effects of Welfare and Complexity. International Interactions 41 (1):84–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Kim and Margalit Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/1GGBBK
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Kim and Margalit supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Kim and Margalit supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 9.6 MB