Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T20:15:09.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Potential of telepresence robots to enhance social connectedness in older adults with dementia: an integrative review of feasibility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2017

Wendy Moyle Open the ORCID record for Wendy Moyle [Opens in a new window] ,
Urska Arnautovska ,
Tamara Ownsworth  and
Cindy Jones
Wendy Moyle*
Affiliation:
Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia School of Nursing and Midwifery, Nathan Campus, Griffith University, Nathan, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Urska Arnautovska
Affiliation:
Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia School of Applied Psychology, Mt Gravatt Campus, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Tamara Ownsworth
Affiliation:
Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia School of Applied Psychology, Mt Gravatt Campus, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Cindy Jones
Affiliation:
Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia School of Nursing and Midwifery, Nathan Campus, Griffith University, Nathan, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Professor Wendy Moyle, Menzies Health Institute QLD, Griffith University, 2.10 Health Sciences (N48), 170 Kessels Road, Nathan, Brisbane, Queensland, 4111, Australia. Phone: +61 7 3735 5526; Fax: +61 7 3735 5431. Email: w.moyle@griffith.edu.au.
Get access

Abstract

Background:

Socially assistive robots are increasingly used as a therapeutic tool for people with dementia, as a means to improve quality of life through social connection. This paper presents a mixed-method integrative review of telepresence robots used to improve social connection of people with dementia by enabling real-time communication with their carers.

Methods:

A systematic search of Medline, ProQuest, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library was conducted to gather available evidence on the use of telepresence robots, specifically videoconferencing, to improve social connectedness, in people with dementia. A narrative synthesis was used to analyze the included studies.

Results:

A review of 1,035 records, identified four eligible peer-reviewed publications, reporting findings about three different mobile telepresence robots. The study designs included qualitative and mixed-methods approaches, focusing primarily on examining the feasibility and acceptability of the telepresence robots within the context of dementia care. These studies reported both positive outcomes of using telepresence robots to connect people with dementia to others, as well as barriers, such as a lack of experience in using a robot and technological issues.

Conclusion:

Although limited, the current literature suggests that telepresence robots have potential utility for improving social connectedness of people with dementia and their carers. However, more systematic feasibility studies are needed to inform the development of telepresence robots followed by clinical trials to establish efficacy within dementia care.

Keywords

older adultsdementiasocially assistive robotstelepresence technologysocial connectionsocial isolationliterature review
Type
Review Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 29 , Issue 12 , December 2017 , pp. 1951 - 1964
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Active and assisted living programme (2016). AAL Programme. ICT for Ageing Well [Online]. Available at: http://www.aal-europe.eu/projects/excite/; last accessed April 24 2017.Google Scholar
Alzheimer's Australia (2014). Living with Dementia in the Community: Challenges & Opportunities, Canberra, Alzheimer's Australia Inc.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5®), Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Pub.Google Scholar
Bemelmans, R., Gelderblom, G. J., Jonker, P. and de Witte, L. (2012). Socially assistive robots in elderly care: a systematic review into effects and effectiveness. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 13, 114–120. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2010.10.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bunn, F. et al. (2012). Psychosocial factors that shape patient and carer experiences of dementia diagnosis and treatment: a systematic review of qualitative studies. PLoS Med, 9, e1001331. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001331.Google Scholar
D'Onofrio, G. et al. (2016). Cognitive stimulation and information communication technologies (ICT) in alzheimer's disease: a systematic review. International Journal of Medical and Biological Frontiers, 22, 97–106.Google Scholar
Doyle, C., Jackson, D., Loi, S., Malta, S. and Moore, K. (2016). Videoconferencing and telementoring about dementia care: evaluation of a pilot model for sharing scarce old age psychiatry resources. International Psychogeriatrics, 28, 1567–1574. doi: 10.1017/S1041610216000740.Google Scholar
Feil-Seifer, D. and Mataric, M. J. (2005). Defining socially assistive robotics. Rehabilitation Robotics. ICORR 2005. 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Chicago, USA. IEEE, 465–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Casal, J. A., Loizeau, A., Csipke, E., Franco-Martín, M., Perea-Bartolomé, M. V. and Orrell, M. (2016). Computer-based cognitive interventions for people living with dementia: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Aging & Mental Health, 1–14. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2015.1132677.Google Scholar
Giraff Technologies AB (2017). Available at: http://www.giraff.org/ [Online]; last accessed April 5, 2017.Google Scholar
Gross, H. M. et al. (2012). Further progress towards a home robot companion for people with mild cognitive impairment. Proceedings 2012 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.Google Scholar
Holwerda, T. J. et al. (2014). Feelings of loneliness, but not social isolation, predict dementia onset: results from the amsterdam study of the elderly (AMSTEL). Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 85, 135–142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2012-304479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huxhold, O., Miche, M. and Schüz, B. (2014). Benefits of having friends in older ages: differential effects of informal social activities on well-being in middle-aged and older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69, 366–375. https://doi-org.libraryproxy.griffith.edu.au/10.1093/geronb/gbt029.Google Scholar
Kachouie, R., Sedighadeli, S., Khosla, R. and Chu, M. T. (2014). Socially assistive robots in elderly care: a mixed-method systematic literature review. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 30, 369–393. doi: 10.1080/10447318.2013.873278.Google Scholar
Kristoffersson, A., Coradeschi, S. and Loutfi, A. (2013). A review of mobile robotic telepresence. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 2013, 1–17. doi: 10.1155/2013/902316.Google Scholar
Levenson, R. W., Sturm, V. E. and Haase, C. M. (2014). Emotional and behavioral symptoms in neurodegenerative disease: a model for studying the neural bases of psychopathology. Annual Reviews of Clinical Psychology, 10, 581–606.Google Scholar
Martin-Khan, M., Fatehi, F., Kesilas, M., Lucas, K., Gray, L. C. and Smith, A. C. (2015). Establishing a centralised telehealth service increases telehealth activity at a tertiary hospital. BMC Health Services Research, 15, 534. doi: 10.1186/212912-015-1180-x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayer, P., Beck, C. and Panek, P. (2012). Examples of multimodal user interfaces for socially assistive robots in ambient assisted living environments. Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom), 2012 IEEE 3rd International Conference on, 2012. IEEE, 401–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehrabian, S., Extra, J., Wu, Y. H., Pino, M., Traykov, L. and Rigaud, A. S. (2014). The perceptions of cognitively impaired patients and their caregivers of a home telecare system. Medical Devices: Evidence and Research, 8, 21–29. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S70520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mordoch, E., Osterreicher, A., Guse, L., Roger, K. and Thompson, G. (2013). Use of social commitment robots in the care of elderly people with dementia: a literature review. Maturitas, 74, 14–20. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.10.015.Google Scholar
Moyle, W., Jones, C., Cooke, M., O'Dwyer, S., Sung, B. and Drummond, S. (2014). Connecting the person with dementia and family: a feasibility study of a telepresence robot. BMC Geriatrics, 14, 1–11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-14-7.Google Scholar
Moyle, W., Kellett, U., Ballantyne, A. and Gracia, N. (2011). Dementia and loneliness: an Australian perspective. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 20, 1445–1453. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03549.x.Google Scholar
Perry, J. and Beyer, S. (2012). Ethical issues around telecare: the views of people with intellectual disabilities and people with dementia. Journal of Assistive Technologies, 6, 71–75. doi: 10.1108/17549451211214382.Google Scholar
Pinto-Bruno, Á. C., García-Casal, J. A., Csipke, E., Jenaro-Río, C. and Franco-Martín, M. (2016). ICT-based applications to improve social health and social participation in older adults with dementia. A systematic literature review. Aging & Mental Health, 1–8. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2016.1262818.Google Scholar
Ramos-Rios, R., Mateos, R., Lojo, D., Conn, D. K. and Patterson, T. (2012). Telepsychogeriatrics: a new horizon in the care of mental health problems in the elderly. International Psychogeriatrics, 24, 1708–1731. doi: 10.1017/s1041610212000981.Google Scholar
Robinson, H., MacDonald, B. A., Kerse, N. and Broadbent, E. (2013). Suitability of healthcare robots for a dementia unit and suggested improvements. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 14, 34–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2012.09.006.Google Scholar
Robinson, H., MacDonald, B. and Broadbent, E. (2014). The role of healthcare robots for older people at home: a review. International Journal of Social Robotics, 6, 575–591. doi: 10.1007/s12369-014-0242-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savenstedt, S., Zingmark, K. and Sandman, P. O. (2004). Being present in a distant room: aspects of teleconsultations with older people in a nursing home. Qualitative Health Research, 14, 1046–1057. doi: 10.1177/1049732304267754.Google Scholar
Schroeter, C. et al. (2013). Realization and user evaluation of a companion robot for people with mild cognitive impairments. Proceedings – IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2013. 1153–1159.Google Scholar
Tong, A., Sainsbury, P. and Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19, 349–357.Google Scholar
Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing integrative reviews of the literature: methods and purposes. International Journal of Adult Vocational Education and Technology, 7, 62–70. doi: 10.4018/IJAVET.2016070106.Google Scholar
Tsai, T. C., Hsu, Y. L., Ma, A. I., King, T. and Wu, C. H. (2007). Developing a telepresence robot for interpersonal communication with the elderly in a home environment. Telemedicine and e-Health, 13, 407–424. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2006.0068.Google Scholar
Wang, R. H., Mihailidis, A., Sudhama, A., Begum, M. and Huq, R. (2017). Robots to assist daily activities: views of older adults with Alzheimer's disease and their caregivers. International Psychogeriatrics, 29, 67–79. doi: 10.1017/S1041610216001435.Google Scholar
Whittemore, R. and Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52, 546–553.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1992). The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines, Geneva, World Health Organization.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2015). 10 facts on dementia [Online]. WHO. Available: http://www.who.int/features/factfiles/dementia/en/; last accessed April 19 2017.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Moyle et al supplementary material

Appendix

Download Moyle et al supplementary material(File)
File 14 KB