¹ On Hyndman see Tsuzuki, C., H. M. Hyndman and British Socialism (Oxford, 1961)Google Scholar and Bevir, M., “H.M. Hyndman: A Rereading and a Reassessment”, History of Political Thought, XII (1991), pp. 125–145.Google Scholar On Morris see Thompson, E.P., William Morris: From Romantic to Revolutionary (London, 1977).Google Scholar On the Fabians see Wolfe, W., From Radicalism to Socialism (New Haven, 1975).Google Scholar

² For previous accounts of the S.D.F. see Lee, H. and Archbold, E., Social-Democracy in Britain (London, 1935);Google ScholarTsuzuki, , Hyndman, , and Wilkins, M., “The Non-Socialist Origins of England's First Important Socialist Organisation”, International Review of Social History, IV (1959). pp. 199–207.Google Scholar

³ See, for instance, Samuel, R., “The Workshop of the World: Steam Power and Hand Technology in Mid-Victorian Britain”, History Workshop, 3 (1977), pp. 6–72, and G. Stedman Jones, “Rethinking Chartism”, in Languages of Class: Studies in EnglishCrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁹ ibid. p. 135.

¹⁰ Ibid., p. 122.

¹¹ Ibid., p. 144.

¹² Poor Man's Guardian, 15 12 1832.Google Scholar

¹³ O'Brien, , Rise, , p. 101.Google Scholar

¹⁴ Ibid., p. 113.

¹⁵ “Bronterre's Second Letter to the People of England”, Political Letters and Pamphlets, 12 02 1831.Google Scholar

¹⁶ National Reformer, 7 01 1837.Google Scholar

¹⁷ On chartism see, particularly, Jones, Stedman, “Chartism”; but also, Briggs, A. (ed.), Chartist Studies (London, 1959);Google ScholarEpstein, J. and Thompson, D. (eds), The Chartist Experience: Studies in Working Class Radicalism and Culture 1830–1860 (London, 1982);CrossRefGoogle ScholarGodfrey, C., Chartist Lives: The Anatomy of a Working-Class Movement (New York, 1987),Google Scholar and Thompson, D., The Chartists (London, 1984).Google Scholar

¹⁸ National Reform League Tract No. 5, 11 1855.Google Scholar

¹⁹ Proceedings of 2nd Co-operative Congress. Cited by Plummer, , Bronterre, p. 38.Google Scholar

²⁰ National Reformer, 7 01 1837.Google Scholar

²¹ O'Brien, , Rise, p. 127.Google Scholar

²² Ibid., p. 102.

²³ On Charles Murray's organisation of O'Brien's funeral see, Plummer, , Bronterre, p. 269;Google Scholar and, for the announcement of Charles Murray's lecture see Justice, 15 November 1884. For confirmation that Charles Murray was an O'Brienite when he joined the S.D.F. see Hyndman, H., The Record of an Adventurous Life (London, 1912), p. 246;Google Scholar and Lee, and Archbold, , Social-Democracy, p. 245.Google Scholar For Charles Murray's views see Murray, C., A Letter to Mr. George Jacob Holyoake (London, 1854).Google Scholar

²⁴ For a report of the funeral see Reynolds's, 8 01 1865.Google Scholar As a member of the D.F.'s executive signed, James Murray, The Democratic Federation, Socialism Made Plain: Being the Social and Political Manifesto of The Democratic Federation (London, 1883).Google Scholar

²⁵ On the letter see Plummer, , Bronterre, p. 268; on the lecture see Christian Socialist, 09 1883.Google Scholar

²⁶ Hyndman, , Record, p. 254.Google Scholar

²⁷ Beer, M., Fifty Years of International Socialism (London, 1935), pp. 13–14.Google Scholar

²⁸ Collins, H. and Abramsky, C., Karl Marx and the British Labour Movement (London, 1965).Google Scholar

²⁹ Harrison, R., Before the Socialists (London, 1965), pp. 210–250.Google Scholar

³⁰ On the republican movement see. Gossman, N., “Republicanism in Nineteenth Century England”, International Review of Social History, VII (1962), pp. 47–60;CrossRefGoogle ScholarHarrison, , Before the Socialists; and E. Royle, Radicals, Republicans, and Secularists (Manchester, 1980).Google Scholar On the defenders of the Commune, though the O'Brienites receive inadequate attention, see Harrison, R. (ed), The English Defence of the Commune (London, 1971).Google Scholar For James Murray's role in the Hyde Park rally see Justice, 9 03 1889.Google Scholar

³¹ International Herald, 1 06 1877.Google Scholar

³² Beer, , Fifty Years, p. 14.Google Scholar

³³ Marx, K. and Engels, F., Letters to the Americans 1848–1895 (New York, 1953), p. 89.Google Scholar

³⁴ On the London clubs see, Shipley, S., “Club Life and Socialism in Mid-Victorian England”, History Workshop Pamphlet No. 5 (1971) –Google Scholar this pioneering work rescued the clubs from historical obscurity, but it suffers from Shipley's overbearing insistence on presenting his subjects as model socialists. For contemporary accounts from contrasting perspectives see Mayhew, H., Report Concerning the Trade and Hours of Closing Usual Among the Unlicensed Victualling Establishments at Certain So-called “Working Men's Clubs” (London, n.d.).Google Scholar and Oakey, T., A Basketfulof Memories (London, 1930).Google Scholar On the continuation of club life in a socialist milieu see Macintyre, S., A Proletarian Science (London, 1986).Google Scholar

³⁵ Shipley, , Club Life, pp. 40–41.Google Scholar

³⁶ Mann, T., Memoirs (London, 1923). pp. 11–20.Google Scholar

³⁷ See, International Herald, 12 10 1872,Google Scholar and Rothstein, A., A House on Clerkenwell Green (London, 1983). The Clerkenwell Patriotic Club was founded by Tom Mottershed who had sat on the General Council of the International.Google Scholar

³⁸ The Republican, 04 1880.Google Scholar

³⁹ See Leno, J., Drury Lane Lyrics (London, 1868);Google Scholar on Dunn, , Labour Standard, 11 02 1882; on Lemon, Shipley. Club Life, pp. 41–43; on Williams, Justice, 21 07 1894, and on Macdonald, Justice, 11 07 1896.Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Kitz wrote an autobiography in Freedom 01–07 1912. The reference is to Freedom. 02 1912.Google Scholar

⁴¹ On Hyndman see Bevir, ,“Hyndman”; Tsuzuki, Hyndman; Hyndman, Record;Google ScholarHyndman, H., Further Reminiscences (London, 1912),Google Scholar and Hyndman, R., Last Years of H.M. Hyndman (London, 1923).Google Scholar

⁴² For Hyndman, at Rose Street see Justice, 21 07 1894; for Hyndman's lecture to the M. S. L. see National Reformer, 30 10 1881, and on Hyndman and the clubs in general see Hyndman, , Record, pp. 246–248.Google Scholar

⁴³ Hyndman, . Record, p. 247.Google Scholar

⁴³ Justice, 4 08 1884.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ Mill–Taylor Correspondence, cited by Tsuzuki, , Hyndman, p. 47. Tsuzuki says “all” the clubs left the D.F., but this was not so. His source is Justice, 9 August 1884 which is an unreliable self-assessment; thus, Tsuzuki himself rightly disparages the claim, found in the same article, that the D.F. was a committed socialist organisation from the moment it was founded.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ I have found the following reports of the preliminary meetings in 1881: the 1st meeting, Radical, 5 March, and Echo, 3 March: the second meeting, Daily News, 7 March, and Radical, 12 March: the third meeting, Observer, 20 March, and Daily News, 21 March.

⁴⁷ Radical, 5 03 1881.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ On Dunn's role see, Daily News, 7 03 1881, and Radical, 12 03 1881.Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Radical, 12 03 1881.Google Scholar

⁵⁰ Daily News, 21 03 1881.Google Scholar

⁵¹ Daily News, 7 03 1881.Google Scholar

⁵² I have found the following accounts of the inaugural conference: Daily News, 9 06 1881; Echo, 9 0611881; Pall Mall Gazette, 9 06 1881; St James's Gazette, 9 06 1881; The Times, 9 06 1881, and Reynolds's, 12 06 1881.Google Scholar

⁵³ Daily News. 9 06 1881.Google Scholar

⁵⁴ Ibid.

⁵⁵ Ibid.

⁵⁶ Ibid.

⁵⁷ Radical, 16 07 1881.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ Radical, 3 06 1882. It was not until 1884 that Edward Carpenter's donation enabled the D.F. to publish Justice. It is, therefore, necessary to search other newspapers for information on the early history of the D.F. The Radical is the most useful.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ Radical, 3 06 1882.Google Scholar

⁶⁰ Ibid.

⁶¹ Radical, 29 04 1882.Google Scholar

⁶² Radical, 25 06 1881: for the lecture's title see Radical, 18 06 1881.Google Scholar

⁶³ Radical, 25 06 1881.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Radical, 25 03 1882; Radical, 25 06 1881.Google Scholar

⁶⁵ Radical, 2 04 1881.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ Ibid.

⁶⁷ Justice, 9 08 1884.Google Scholar

⁶⁸ The Democratic Federation, Socialism Made Plain.

⁶⁹ Justice, 25 10 1884.Google Scholar

⁷⁰ Justice, 30 08 1884.Google Scholar

⁷¹ Ibid.

⁷² Justice, 10 05 1884.Google Scholar

⁷³ Justice, 29 03 1884.Google Scholar

⁷⁴ Ibid.

⁷⁵ Ibid.

⁷⁶ Ibid.

⁷⁷ This was true of most British Marxists and their socialist critics in the early 1880s. See Hyndman, H., The Text Book of Democracy: England for All (London, 1881);Google ScholarMorris, W., “Monopoly or How Labour is Robbed”, in The Collected Works of William Morris, introduction M. Morris, 24 Vols (London, 1910–1915), vol. 23: Signs of Change, Lectures on Socialism;Google ScholarOlivier, S., “Perverse Socialism”, To-day (1886), pp. 47–55 and 109–114, and Webb, S., “Rent, Interest and Wages: Being a Criticism of Karl Marx and a Statement of Economic Theory”, Passfield Papers, British Library of Political and Economic Science, London, VII:4.Google Scholar

⁷⁸ Justice, 31 05 1884.Google Scholar

⁷⁹ Justice, 19 01 1884.Google Scholar

⁸⁰ Justice, 7 06 1884.Google Scholar

⁸¹ Justice, 29 03 1884.Google Scholar

⁸² Justice, 19 01 1884.Google Scholar

⁸³ Ibid.

⁸⁴ Justice, 12 07 1884.Google Scholar

⁸⁵ Justice, 19 01 1884.Google Scholar

⁸⁶ Ibid.

⁸⁷ Ibid.

⁸⁸ On Aveling see Kapp, Y., Eleanor Marx, 2 vols (London, 1979),Google Scholar and Tsuzuki, C., The Life of Eleanor Marx 1855–1898 (Oxford, 1967).Google Scholar For his beliefs see Aveling, E., The Students' Marx (London, 1892).Google Scholar

⁸⁹ Justice, 5 04 1884.Google Scholar

⁹⁰ For when Marx's works became available in England see, Macintyre, , Proletarian, pp. 91–93.Google Scholar

⁹¹ On the exiles see, Olivier, H., The International Anarchist Movement in Late Victorian London (London, 1983);Google ScholarQuail, J., The Slow Burning Fuse (London, 1978),Google Scholar and Thompson, , Morris, pp. 276–287.Google Scholar

⁹² Shaw, G., “Autobiographical Notebook”, The Shaw Papers, The British Museum, London, BM50710; Bax, E., Reminiscences and Reflections of a Mid and Late Victorian (London, 1918), pp. 39–42;Google ScholarLabour Standard, 1 10 1881.Google Scholar

⁹³ His main books were, Hyndman, , England,Google Scholar and Hyndman, H., The Historical Basis of Socialism in England (London, 1883).Google Scholar His polemical pamphlets were, Hyndman, H., Socialism vs Smithism (London, 1883),Google Scholar and Hyndman, H., Socialism and Slavery (London, 1884).Google Scholar For the debate see Hyndman, H. and Bradlaugh, C., Will Socialism Benefit the English People? (London, 1884).Google Scholar

⁹⁴ Samuel, “Workshop of the World”.

⁹⁵ On tailors see Stewart, M. and Hunter, L., The Needle is Threaded (London, 1964);Google ScholarDrake, B., “The Tailoring Trade”, in Webb, S. and Freeman, A., (eds), Seasonal Trades (London, 1912), pp. 70–91Google Scholar and Dobbs, S., The Clothing Workers of Great Britain, introduction Webb, S. (London, 1928).Google Scholar On shoemakers see Fox, A., A History of the National Union of Boot and Shoe Operatives (Oxford, 1950),Google Scholar and Church, R., “Labour Supply and Innovation 1800–1860: The Boot and Shoe Industry”, Business History, 12 (1970), pp. 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar On compositors see Alford, B., “Government Expenditure and the Growth of the Printing Industry in the Nineteenth Century”, The Economic History Review, 17 (1964), pp. 96–112,CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Huss, R., The Development of Printers' Mechanical Typesetting Methods 1822–1925 (Charlottesville, 1975).Google Scholar

⁹⁶ Watmough, P., “The Membership of the Social Democratic Federation 1885–1902”, Labour History Bulletin, 34 (1977), pp. 35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁹⁷ The revised view of the depression began with Beales, H., “The Great Depression in Industry and Trade”, Economic History Review, 5 (1934), pp. 65–75,CrossRefGoogle Scholar and appears in Hobsbawm, E., Industry and Empire (Harmondsworth, 1969),Google Scholar and Paul, S., The Myth of the Great Depression 1873–1896 (London, 1969).Google Scholar

⁹⁸ Jones, G. Stedman, Outcast London (Oxford, 1971), esp. pt. 1.Google Scholar

⁹⁹ Hobsbawm, E., “Hyndman and the S.D.F.”, in Labouring Men (London, 1964), p. 231.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁰ On the country party and the origins of radicalism see Robbins, C., The Eighteenth Century Commonwealth Men (Cambridge (Mass.), 1959);CrossRefGoogle ScholarPocock, J., The Machiavellian Moment (Princeton, 1975),Google Scholar and Peters, M., “The ‘Monitor’ on the Constitution, 1755–1765: New Light on the Ideological Origins of English Radicalism”, English Historical Review, 86 (1971), pp. 706–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁰¹ Justice, 14 06 1884.Google Scholar

¹⁰² Thompson, , Morris, p. 364.Google Scholar

¹⁰³ Tsuzuki, , Hyndman, pp. 60–67.Google Scholar Also see Beer, M., A History of British Socialism, 2 vols (London, 1953), 2, p. 253.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁴ The signatories were, Aveling, Eleanor Marx-Aveling, Banner, Bax, W. Clarke, Cooper, Joseph Lane, John Mahon, Sam Mainwaring, and Morris.

¹⁰⁵ The signatories were, John Burns, Burrows, Champion, Robert Frost, Mrs. Hicks, Hyndman, J. Murray, Quelch, and Williams.

¹⁰⁶ Justice, 11 04 1885. The “old programme” was that cited above since the S.D.F. had adopted a new programme based on that of the anarchistic Labour Emancipation League.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁷ See Collins, , “Marxism”; Thompson, , Morris, p. 336;Google ScholarTorr, D., Tom Mann (London, 1956), p. 213,Google Scholar and Tsuzuki, , Hyndman, pp. 55–56.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁸ There is no iron law of wages in Hyndman, H., The Economics of Socialism (London, 1896).Google Scholar

¹⁰⁹ Radical, 15 04 1882.Google Scholar

¹¹⁰ Thompson, , Morris, p. 341.Google Scholar

¹¹¹ Thompson, P., Socialists, Liberals and Labour (London, 1967), p. 114 – for membership figures see Appendix B.Google Scholar

¹¹² On working class Toryism in Lancashire see Howell, D., British Workers and The Independent Labour Party 1888–1906 (Manchester, 1983), pp. 204–229.Google Scholar

¹¹³ See Barrow, L., “The Socialism of Robert Blatchford and the Clarion Newspaper 1889–1918” (Ph.D. thesis, London, 1975),Google Scholar and Thompson, L., Robert Blatchford (London, 1951).Google Scholar For Blatchford's beliefs see Blatchford, R., Merrie England (London, 1894),Google Scholar and Blatchford, R., Britain for the British (London, 1902).Google Scholar