Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T22:25:19.025Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Welfare State Attitudes to the Male Breadwinning System: The United States and Sweden in Comparative Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2009

Lena Sommestad
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Human reproduction is a basic economic activity in every society. It includes activities such as maternal care, childcare, old age provision, poor relief, healthcare, and labour protection. In pre-industrial times, human reproduction was typically a part of kin-based household economies, but since the onset of industrialization two new institutional solutions have developed: the male breadwinning system and the welfare state.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Review of Social History , Volume 42 , supplement S5: The Rise and Decline of the Male Breadwinner Family? , September 1997 , pp. 153 - 174
Copyright
Copyright © Internationaal Instituut voor Sociale Geschiedenis 1999

References

1 Robertson, A. F., Beyond the Family. The Social Organization of Human Reproduction (cambridge, 1991), pp. 1–5Google Scholar.

2 Jet Bussemaker and Kees van Kersbergen, “Gender and Welfare States: Some Theoretical Reflections”, and Borchorst, Anette, “Welfare State Regimes, Women's Interests and the EC”, both in Sainsbury, Diane (ed.), Gendering Welfare States (London, 1994), pp. 8–44Google Scholar; Lewis, Jane (ed.), Women and Social Policies in Europe. Work, Family and the State (Aldershot, 1993), pp. 15–20Google Scholar; and Sainsbury, Diane, Gender, Equality and Welfare States (Cambridge, 1996), pp. 9–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 49–72 and 190–194.

3 Gordon, Linda, Pitied But Not Entitled. Single Mothers and the History of Welfare 1890–1935 (New York, 1994)Google Scholar; Kessler-Harris, Alice, “Gendered Interventions: Exploring the Historical Roots of U.S. Social Policy”, The Japanese Journal of American Studies, 5 (1993–1994)Google Scholar; Pederson, Susan, Family, Dependence, and the Origins of the Welfare State. Britain and France 1914–1945 (Cambridge, 1993)Google Scholar; Sainsbury, Gender, Equality, pp. 49–72; and Skocpol, Theda, Protecting Soldiers and Mothers. The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States (Cambridge, MA, 1992)Google Scholar.

4 Lewis, Jane, “Gender and the Development of Welfare Regimes”, Journal of European Social Policy, 2 (1992), pp. 159–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Compare Jenson, Jane and Mahon, Rianne, “Representing Solidarity: Class, Gender and the Crisis in Social-Democratic Sweden”, New Left Review, 201 (09/10 1993), pp. 77–91Google Scholar; and Hirdman, Yvonne, “Genussystemet”, inSOU 1990: 44. Demokrati och makt i Sverige (Stockholm, 1990), pp. 73–112Google Scholar.

6 Compare Sainsbury, Gender, Equality, pp. 63–67.

7 For example Koven, Seth and Michel, Sonya, “Womanly Duties: Maternalist Politics and the Origins of Welfare States in France, Germany, Great Britain, and the United States, 1880–1920”, 1The American Historical Review, 95 (1990), pp. 1076–1114CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pederson, Family, Dependence, and the Origins of the Welfare State', and.Skocpol, Protecting Soldiers and Mothers.

8 For theoretical overviews, see for example ibid., pp. 11–62; and Williamson, John B. and Pampel, Fred C., Old Age Security in Comparative Perspective (New York, 1993), pp. 5–19Google Scholar.

9 For this approach, compare Bussemaker and van Kersbergen, “Gender and Welfare States”, p. 20.

10 Low fertility and ageing, though not migration, have attracted substantial attention in welfare state research: see, for example, Bock, Gisela and Thane, Pat, Maternity and Gender Policies. Women and the Rise of the European Welfare States 1880s to 1950s (London, 1991), pp. 10–11Google Scholar; Lindert, Peter H., “The Rise of Social Spending, 1880–1930”, Explorations in Economic History, 31 (1994), pp. 6–7 and 16–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Pampel, Fred C. and Williamson, John B., Age, Class, Politics and the Welfare State, (Cambridge, NJ, 1989), pp. 5–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar and 165–168.

11 Maddison, Angus, Dynamic Forces in Capitalist Development. A Long-Run Comparative View (Oxford, 1991), pp. 6–7Google Scholar, table 1.1.

12 Ninth Census of the United States taken in the year 1870. Volume III, pp. 808–809; Thirteenth Census of the United States taken in the year 1910. Volume VIII, p. 238.

13 Williamson, Jeffrey G. and Lindert, Peter H., American Inequality. A Macroeconomic History (New York, 1980), pp. 75–132Google Scholar; Lindert, “The Rise of Social Spending”, pp. 26–28.

14 Cott, Nancy F., The Bonds of Womanhood. “Women's Sphere” in New England, 1780–1835 (New Haven, 1977)Google Scholar; and Ryan, Mary P., Cradle of the Middle Class. The Family in Oneida County, New York, 1790–1865 (Cambridge, MA, 1981)Google Scholar.

15 Gjerde, Jon, The Migration from Balestrand, Norway, to the Upper Middle West (Cambridge, MA, 1985), pp. 192–201Google Scholar; Jensen, Joan, Promise to the Land. Essays on Rural Women (Albuquerque, 1991), pp. 11–21Google Scholar: Sommestad, Lena and McMurry, Sally, “Farm Daughters and Industrialization: A Comparative Analysis of Dairying in New York State and Sweden, 1860–1920”, Journal of Women's History (forthcoming, vol. 10, Summer 1998)Google Scholar.

16 Thirteenth Census of the United States taken in 1910. Volume IV, p. 37; Bock and Thane, Maternity and Gender Policies, p. 16, table 0.2.

17 Amott, Teresa L. and Matthaei, Julie A., Race, Gender and Work. A Multicultural Economic History of Women in the United States (Boston, 1991), p. 303Google Scholar, table 9.3.

18 Ibid., pp. 297–307; Jensen, Promise to the Land, pp. 11–21; Kessler-Harris, Alice, Out to Work. A History of Wage-Earning Women in the United States (Oxford, 1982), pp. 108–141Google Scholar; and by the same author, A Woman's Wage (Lexington, 1990), pp. 57–80.

19 Levine, Daniel, Poverty and Society. The Growth of the American Welfare State in Inter-national Comparison (New Brunswick, NJ, 1988), pp. 15–23Google Scholar and 151–179.

20 Kessler-Harris, “Gendered Interventions”, pp. 3–22; and by the same author, “The Paradox of Motherhood. Night Work Restrictions in the United States”, in Wikander, Ulla, Kessler-Harris, Alice and Lewis, Jane (eds), Protecting Women. Labor Legislation in Europe, the United States, and Australia, 1880–1920 (Urbana, 1995), pp. 337–357Google Scholar; and Muncy, Robyn, Creating a Female Dominion in American Reform 1890–1935 (New York, 1991), pp. 3–37Google Scholar.

21 Skocpol, Protecting Soldiers and Mothers, pp. 3–11 and 424–479.

22 Katz, Michael B., In the Shadow of the Poorhouse. A Social History of Welfare in America (New York, 1986), pp. 113–205Google Scholar;Levine, Poverty and Society, pp. 151–179; Patterson, James T., America's Struggle Against Poverty 1900–1980 (Cambridge, MA, 1981), pp. 20–34Google Scholar; Skocpol, Protecting Soldiers and Mothers pp.3–11, 226–229 and 285–286.

23 Brenner, Robert H., American Philanthropy (Chicago, 2nd ed., 1988), pp. 72–135Google Scholar; Watson, Frank Dekker, The Charity Organization Movement in the United States. A Study in American Philanthropy (New York, 1922), pp. 65–443Google Scholar.

24 Baker, Paula, “The Domestication of Politics: Women and American Society 1780–1920”, in Gordon, Linda (ed.), Women, the State and Welfare (Madison, 1990), pp. 55–91Google Scholar; Brenner, American Philanthropy, pp. 72–84; Kessler-Harris, “The Paradox of Motherhood”, p. 338; Levine, Poverty and Society pp. 28–36; Muncy, Creating a Female Dominion, pp. 3–211; Skocpol, Protecting Soldiers and Mothers, pp. 8–10, 95–96 and 321–524. For more radical outlooks among American female reformers, see Sarvasy, Wendy, “Beyond the Difference Versus Equality Debate: Postsuffrage Feminism, Citizenship and the Quest for a Feminist Welfare State”, Signs, 17 (1992), pp. 329–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1957. A Statistical Abstract Supplement, US Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census (Washington DC, 1960), p. 8, Series A 20 and p.10, Series A 84; Simon, Julian L., The Economic Consequences of Immigration (Oxford, 1989), pp. 31–35Google Scholar; Berkowitz, Edward D., America's Welfare State. From Roosevelt to Reagan (Baltimore, 1991), pp. 15–28Google Scholar.

26 Historical Statistics of the United States, p. 62, Series 134; Simon, The Economic Consequences of Immigration, pp. 22–34.

27 Klaus, Alisa, “De-Population and Race Suicide: Maternalism and Pronatalist Ideologies in France and the United States”, in Koven, Seth and Michel, Sonya, Mothers of a New World Maternalist Politics and the Origins of Welfare States (New York, 1993), pp. 188–190Google Scholar. The boost to population growth caused by immigration was further consolidated by relatively satisfactory birth-rates(Historical Statistics of the United States, p. 23, Series B 19).

28 Muncy, Creating a Female Dominion, pp. 93–157.

29 Berkowitz, America's Welfare State, pp. 96–97; Gordon, Pitied But Not Entitled, pp. 37–64; Kessler-Harris, ”The Paradox of Motherhood”, p. 337; Koven and Michel, “Womanly Duties”, pp. 1085–1107; and Sonya Michel, “The Limits of Maternalism: Policies Towards American Wage-Earning Mothers during the Progressive Era”, in Koven and Michel, Mothers of a New World, pp. 277–320.

30 Berkowitz, America's Welfare State, pp. 1–38 and 96–97; Gordon, Pitied But Not Entitled, pp. 145–285; Barbara J. Nelson, “The Origins of the Two-Channel Welfare State: Workmen's Compensation and Mothers' Aid”, in Gordon, Women, the State and Welfare, pp. 123–151; and Sainsbury, Gender, Equality, pp. 58–63, 81–84, 89–90 and 113–116.

31 Maddison, Dynamic Forces, pp. 6–7, table 1.1. The estimations refer to 1913.

32 Historical Statistics of Sweden, vol. I (Stockholm, 1955), pp. 45–46, 68, tables B 2 and B 21.

33 Esping-Andersen, Gosta, “Jämlikhet, effektivitet och makt. Socialdemokratisk välfärdspolitik”, in Misgeld, Klaus et al. (eds), Socialdemokratins samhālle (Stockholm, 1988), p. 224Google Scholar; Jörberg, Lennart, “Structural Change and Economic Growth: Sweden in the 19th Century”, in Brien, P. K. (ed.), The Industrial Revolution in Europe, vol. 5 of The Industrial Revolutions series (Oxford, 1994), pp. 411–454Google Scholar; Olsson, Sven E., Social Policy and Welfare State in Sweden (Lund, 1990), pp. 112–113Google Scholar; and Söderberg, Tom, Två sekel svensk medek-lass (Stockholm, 1972), p. 243Google Scholar, table 11. For income distribution, see Kuhnle, Stein, “The Beginnings of the Nordic Welfare States: Similarities and Differences”, Supplement, Special Congress Issue: The Nordic Welfare States, Acta Sociologica, 21 (1978), pp. 17–20Google Scholar; and Alderdomsförsäkringskommittén, vol. I (Stockholm, 1912), pp. 66–68. Figures on urbanization and industrialization in Historical Statistics of Sweden, p. 21, table A 14; p. 29, table A 21.

34 Persson, Joakim, “Convergence in Per Capita Income and Migration across the Swedish Counties 1906–1990 European Economic Review (forthcoming); and Ålderdomsförsäkringskommittén, vol. IV (Stockholm, 1912), pp. 332–333Google Scholar, table 11.

35 Elmér, Åke, Från fattigsverige till välfärdsstaten (Stockholm, 1969), pp. 46–49Google Scholar; Jansson, Torkel, “The Age of Associations. Principles and Forms of Organization Between Corporations and Mass Organizations. A Comparative Nordic Survey from a Swedish View-point”, Scandinavan Journal of History, 13, 4(1988), pp. 326–327Google Scholar and 334–339; Olsson, Social Policy, pp. 108–109; Oredsson, Sverker, “Samhällelig eller enskild fattigvård?”, Scandia, 37 (1971), pp. 175–215Google Scholar; Qvarsell, Roger, ”Mellan familj, arbetsgivare och stat”, in Amnå, Erik (ed.), Medmānsklighet att hyra? (Stockholm, 1995), pp. 19–22Google Scholar; and Romlid, Christina, “Swedish Midwives and Their Instruments in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries”, in Marland, Hilary and Rafferty, Anne Marie (eds), Midwives, Society and Childbirth: Debates and Controversies in the Early Modern Period (London, 1997), pp. 38–43Google Scholar.

36 Lindqvist, Rafael, Från folkrōrelse till välfärdsbyråkrati (Lund, 1990), pp. 39–55Google Scholar; Ohrlander, Kajsa, I barnens och nationens intresse (Stockholm, 1992), pp. 148–152Google Scholar; SOS, Allmän häiso- och sjukvård år 1912 (Stockholm, 1914), pp. 84–89, table I.

37 Hellspong, Mats and Löfgren, Orvar, Land och stad (Stockholm, 1974), pp. 243–247Google Scholar; Sommestad and McMurry, “Farm Daughters and Industrialization”; Kälvemark, Ann-Sofie (Ohlander), “Utvandring och självständighet”, Historisk tidskrift, 2 (1983), pp. 154–173Google Scholar; Olsson, Lars, “Den vita piskan”, in Johansson, Alf O. et al. (eds), Dagsverken. 13 essäer i arbetets historia (Lund, 1995), pp. 49–66Google Scholar.

38 Karlsson, Lynn, Mothers as Breadwinners. Myth or Reality in Early Swedish Industry?, Uppsala Papers in Economic History no. 39 (Uppsala, 1995), pp. 5–48Google Scholar; Lynn Karlsson and Ulla Wikander, “Om teknik, arbetsdelning och teknologi som formare av kvinnors – och mäns – arbetsvillkor”, and Jonsson, Inger, “ ‘Arbetssökande kvinnor göre sig icke besvär’ ”, both in Historisk tidskrift, 1 (1987), pp. 59–64Google Scholar and 96–113; and Nyberg, Anita, Tekniken – kvinnornas befriare? (Linköping, 1989), pp. 147–152Google Scholar.

39 Birgitta Jordansson, “ ‘Goda människor från Göteborg’ Fattigvård och välgörenhet under 1800-talet”, and Thöm, Kerstin, “Föreningen för Välgörenhetens ordnande och bostadsfrågan”, both in Sjöberg, Marja Taussi and Vammen, Tinne (eds), På tröskeln till välfärden. Välgörenhetsjormer och arenor i Norden 1800–1930 (Stockholm, 1995), pp. 84–103 and 129–151Google Scholar; and Åberg, Ingrid, “Revivalism, Philanthropy and Emancipation. Women's Liberation and Organization in the Early Nineteenth Century”, Scandinavian Journal of History, 13 (1988), pp. 399–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Among all persons assessed for taxes in 1908, including tax on real estate the average income in Stockholm was almost three times as high as in the countryside(Ålderdomsförsäkringskommittén, IV, pp. 314–315, table 10, and pp. 332–333, table 11).

40 SOS, Folkräkning 1920, p. 11; Thirteenth Census of the United States taken in 1910. Volume IV, pp. 26–28.

41 Nyberg, Anita, “Vad är förvärvsarbete?”, Kvinnovetenskaplig tidskrift, 1 (1987), pp. 54–65Google Scholar.

42 It should be noted, however, that unregistered working wives of forestry and agricultural labourers are still not included (Nyberg, Tekniken – kvinnornas befriare?, pp. 147–151 and 154–155).

43 Historical Statistics of Sweden, p. 63, table B 16, pp. 64–65, table B 17, and p. 68, table B21.

44 Edebalk, Per Gunnar, “Fattigvårdsfolket och pensionsstriden 1912/13”, Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift, 3 (1995), pp. 266, and 269Google Scholar; Historical Statistics of Sweden, p. 71, table B 4, and p. 22, table A 16; and Historical Statistics of the United States, p. 8, Series A 20 and p. 10, Series A 84.

45 Historical Statistics of Sweden, p. 5, table A 4, and p. 72, table B 25; Historical Statistics of the United States, p. 8, Series A 22–24.

46 Qvist, Gunnar, Konsten att blifva en god flicka (Stockholm, 1978), p. 102Google Scholar.

47 Historical Statistics of Sweden, p. 28, table A 20, and Historical Statistics of the United States, p. 15, Series A 225.

48 Schoen, Robert and Urton, William L., Marital Status Life Tables for Sweden (Stockholm, 1979), pp. 16–17Google Scholar.

49 Carlsson, Christina, Kvinnosyn och kvinnopolitik (Lund, 1986), pp. 249–277Google Scholar; Losman, Beata, Kamp för ett nytt kvinnoliv (Stockholm, 1980)Google Scholar; and Wikander, Ulla et al. , Det evigt kvinnliga (Stockholm, 1994)Google Scholar.

50 Widerberg, Karin, Kvinnor, klasser och lagar (Stockholm, 1989), p. 71Google Scholar.

51 Kälvemark, Ann-Sofie (Ohlander), “Swedish Emigration Policy in an International Perspective, 1840–1925”, in Runblom, Harald and Norman, Hans (eds), From Sweden to America. A History of the Migration (Minneapolis, 1976), pp. 106–112(quotation on p. 106)Google Scholar.

52 Korpi, Walter, “Den svenska arbetarrörelsens förutsättningar och strategier”, in Thullberg, Per and Östberg, Kjell (eds), Den svenska modellen (Lund, 1994), pp. 16–19Google Scholar; Kälvemark (Ohlander), ”Swedish Emigration Policy”, pp. 106–112; Stråth, Bo, “Industriborgerskapets roll i den svenska samhällsomvandlingen”, in Kjeldstadli, Knut et al. (eds), Formeringen av industrisamfunnet i Norden fram til 1920, TMV skriftserie, 5 (Oslo, 1994) pp. 29–46Google Scholar.

53 Edebalk, Per-Gunnar, “1916 års olycksfallsförsäkring”, Scandia, 59, 1 (1993), pp. 116–119Google Scholar; and by the same author, “Fattigvårdsfolket”, pp. 266–267, 269; Lindqvist, Från folk-rörelse till välfärdsbyråkrati, pp. 51–53; Ohrlander, I barnens och nationens intresse, pp. 148–152; Olsson, Social Policy, p. 109; and SOS 1971: 42, Försäkring och annat kontant stöd vid arbetslöshet (Stockholm, 1971), pp. 70–72Google Scholar.

54 This law was passed in the wake of widespread female opposition, see Carlsson, Kvinnosyn och kvinnopolitik, pp. 170–175; and Lynn Karlsson, “The Beginning of a 'Masculine Renaissance: The Debate on the 1909 Prohibition against Women's Night Work in Sweden”, in Ulla Wikander et al., Protecting Women, pp. 252–253.

55 Berge, Anders, “Socialpolitik och normgivning i Sverige 1871–1913”, Arkiv, 63–64 (1995), pp. 76–89Google Scholar; Olsson, Social Policy, pp. 83–89, 93–97; and Edebalk, “Fattigvårdsfolket”, pp. 266–275.

56 The lower benefits awarded to women were widely questioned at the time – also in parliament – but tono avail. See Abukhanfusa, Kerstin, Piskan och moroten (Stockholm, 1987), pp. 28–45Google Scholar; Ålderdomsförsäkringskommittén, pp. 65–66 and 79–81.

57 Edebalk, “1916 års olycksfallsförsäkring”, p. 117.

58 Ibid., p. 117; Elmér, Åke, Folkpensioneringen i Sverige (Malmö, 1960), pp. 49–54Google Scholar; SFS 1918:449, §6 and §33.

59 The leading, gender-integrated Swedish social reform organization was Centralförbundet för Socialt arbete (CSA), see Centralförbundet för socialt arbete 1903–1928 (Stockholm, 1928), pp. 13–43; Ohrlander, Kajsa, “Moderniserande kvinnlighet – gammal manlighet”, Arkiv, 63–64 (1995), pp. 45–67Google Scholar; and Olsson, Social Policy, pp. 64–67.

60 Karlsson, “The Beginning of a ‘Masculine Renaissance’ ”, pp. 245–246.

61 Ann-Sofie Ohlander, ”The Invisible Child? The Struggle For a Social Democratic Family Policy in Sweden, 1900–1960s”, in Bock and Thane, Maternity and Gender Policies, p. 60.

62 Anita Nyberg, “Barnomsorgen. Ett kvinligt nollsummespel eller?”, in Amnå, Medmänsklighet att hyra?, pp. 47–82.

63 Kulawik, Teresa, “Moderskapspolitik i Sverige och Tyskland i början på 1900-talet (1900–1930) – en skiss”, in Är Habermas intressant för forskning om kvinnor och den offentliga sektorn? (Stockholm, 1991), pp. 34–37Google Scholar; Sainsbury, Gender, Equality, pp. 101–103 and 190–194; Ohlander, “The Invisible Child?”, pp. 60–72; Ohrlander, I barnens och nationens intresse, pp. 62–91; idem, “Modemiserande kvinnlighet”, pp. 50–67; and Weiner, Gena, De räddade barnen (Falkenberg, 1995), pp. 12–25Google Scholar and 123–261.

64 Carlsson, Allan, The Swedish Experiment in Family Politics. The Myrdals and the Interwar Population Crisis (New Brunswick, NJ, 1990), pp. 6–26Google Scholar; Hatje, Ann-Katrin, Befol-kningsfrågan och välfärden (Stockholm, 1974), pp. 7–8Google Scholar; Historical Statistics of Sweden, I, pp. 45 and 46, table B 2; and Maddison, Dynamic Forces, p. 190, table A.2, and p. 234, table B.3.

65 Carlsson, The Swedish Experiment, pp. 89 and 172–174; Hatje, Befolkningsfrågan och välfärden, pp. 32–37 and 237–245; Myrdal, Gunnar, Population. A Problem for Democracy (Cambridge, MA, 1940), pp. 3–225Google Scholar; Sainsbury, Gender, Equality, p. 101.

66 Barbara Hobson, “Feminist Strategies and Gendered Discourses in Welfare States: Married Women's Right to Work in the United States and Sweden”, in Koven and Michel, Mothers of a New World, pp. 396–429.

67 Edebalk, Arbetslöshetsförsäkringen, p. 21; Elmér, Folkpensioneringen, pp. 80–81 Sainsbury, Gender, Equality, pp. 63–67 and 190–194; SOS 1971:42, pp. 73 and 208–210; Widerberg, Kvinnor, klasser och lagar, pp. 123–125.

68 Rothstein, Bo, Den korporativa staten (Stockholm, 1992), pp. 17–20Google Scholar. Compare Skocpol, Protecting Soldiers and Mothers, pp. 57–60.