Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T11:39:58.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cosmopolitanism, climate change, and greenhouse emissions trading

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2011

Edward A. Page
Edward A. Page*
Affiliation:
Department of Politics and International Studies, Warwick University, Coventry, UK
*
E-mail: e.a.page@warwick.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines the question of whether international markets in allowances conferring the right to emit greenhouse gases are consistent with a cosmopolitan approach to global and intergenerational justice. After placing emissions trading within the context of both climate change policy and cosmopolitan political theory, three normative objections are examined to the use of emissions trading to mitigate the threat of dangerous climate change. Each objection arises from a different application of cosmopolitan thinking: (i) the potentially corrosive impact of greater use of emissions allowances markets on the environmental values of successive generations of atmospheric users; (ii) the awkward relationship between emissions markets and the norms of procedural justice endorsed by all prominent cosmopolitans; and (iii) the injustice expressed by policy instruments that commodify the atmosphere. It is argued that, while each objection should prompt some care in the construction and implementation of emissions trading schemes to guarantee their legitimacy among existing and future users of the atmosphere, they do not generate a decisive normative challenge to the use of markets, properly defined and regulated, to slow global warming.

Keywords

global justicecosmopolitanismclimate changeenvironmental policyemissions tradingfuture generations
Type
Original Papers
Information
International Theory , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , 18 February 2011 , pp. 37 - 69
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, B.A.Stewart, R.B. (1988), ‘Reforming international law: the democratic caw for market incentives’, Columbia Journal of International Law 13(2): 171–199.Google Scholar
Aldy, J.E.Stavins, R.N. (eds) (2008), Architectures for Agreement: Addressing Global Climate Change in the Post-Kyoto World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Banuri, T., Göran-Mäler, K., Grubb, M., Jacobson, H.K.Yamin, F. (1996), ‘Equity and social considerations’, in J. Bruce, H. Lee and E. Haites (eds), Climate Change 1995: Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 79–124.Google Scholar
Barnes, P. (2001), Who Owns the Sky?, Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Barry, B. (2002), Political Argument: A Reissue with a New Introduction, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bazin, D., Ballet, J.Touhri, D. (2004), ‘Environmental responsibility versus taxation’, Ecological Economics 49(2): 129–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beitz, C. (1979), Political Theory and International Relations, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brock, G. (2009), Global Justice: A Cosmopolitan Account, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, A. (2010), ‘The legitimacy of international law’, in S. Besson and J. Tasioulas (eds), The Philosophy of International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 79–96.Google Scholar
Cameron, J.Pierce, D.W. (eds) (2002), Rewards and Intrinsic Motivation: Resolving the Conflict, Westport,CT: Bergin and Garvey.Google Scholar
Caney, S. (2005), Justice Beyond Borders, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caney, S. (2010), ‘Markets, morality and climate change: what, if anything, is wrong with emissions trading’, New Political Economy 15(2): 197–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, N. (2007), The Politics of the Environment: Ideas, Activism, Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, M. (2009), Subprime Carbon? Re-Thinking the World's Largest New Derivatives Market, Washington, DC: Friends of the Earth, http://www.foe.org/pdf/SubprimeCarbonReport.pdfGoogle Scholar
Clifton, S.J. (2009), A Dangerous Obsession: The Evidence against Carbon Trading and for Real Solutions to Avoid a Climate Crunch, London: Friends of the Earth, http://www.foe.co.uk/resource/reports/dangerous_obsession.pdfGoogle Scholar
De Sadeleer, N. (2002), Environmental Principles: from Political Slogans to Legal Rules, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, A. (2003), Citizenship and the Environment, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission (2003), ‘Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003’. Retrieved 5 December 2010 from http://www.bmu.de/files/pdfs/allgemein/application/pdf/emissionshandel031030.pdfGoogle Scholar
European Commission (2009), ‘EU energy and climate change package 2013–2020’, Official Journal of the European Union 52: 1–152.Google Scholar
Frey, B.S. (1997), Not Just for the Money, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Frey, B.S. (2000), Inspiring Economics: Human Motivation in Political Economy, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Gneezy, U.Rustichini, A. (2000a), ‘A fine is a price’, Journal of Legal Studies 29(1): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gneezy, U.Rustichini, A. (2000b), ‘Pay enough or don't pay at all’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 115(3): 791–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodin, R.E. (1994), ‘Selling environmental indulgences’, Kyklos 47(4): 573–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grasso, M. (2010), Justice in Funding Adaptation under the International Climate Change Regime, Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Held, D. (2010), Cosmopolitanism: Ideals and Realities, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Helm, D. (2005), ‘Economic instruments and environmental policy’, The Economic and Social Review 36(3): 205–228.Google Scholar
Hepburn, C. (2006), ‘Regulation by prices, quantities, or both: a review of instrument choice, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 22(2): 226–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hepburn, C. (2007), ‘Carbon trading: a review of the Kyoto mechanisms’, Annual Review of Environmental Resources 32: 375–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Energy Authority (IEA) (2010), ‘Addressing climate change: policies and measures database’. Retrieved 5 December 2010 from http://www.iea.org/textbase/pm/?mode=ccGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, M. (1991), The Green Economy, London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (2002[1785]), Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (edited and translated by A.E. Wood), New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kelman, S. (1981), What Price Incentives? Economists and the Environment, Boston, MA: Auburn House.Google Scholar
Keohane, R.O. (2009), ‘Accountability in world politics’, in S. Gustavsson, C. Karlsson and T. Perssson (eds), The Illusion of Accountability in the European Union, London: Routledge, pp. 11–22.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, P.Brown, E. (2006), ‘Cosmopolitanism’, in E.N. Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford, CA: Stanford University, pp. 1–23, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/cosmopolitanism/Google Scholar
Kossoy, A.Ambrosi, P. (2010), State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2010, Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Kurtzman, J. (2009), ‘The low carbon diet’, Foreign Policy 88(5): 114–122.Google Scholar
Lane, R.E. (1991), The Market Experience, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarowicz, M. (2009), Global Carbon Trading: A Framework for Reducing Emissions, London: TSO.Google Scholar
Linklater, A. (1998), The Transformation of Political Community, Oxford: Polity.Google Scholar
Lohmann, L. (2010), ‘Uncertainty markets and carbon markets: variations on polanyian themes’, New Political Economy 15(2): 225–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, E. (1989), ‘Dominos and the fear of commodification’, in J.W. Chapman and J.R. Pennock (eds), Markets and Justice, New York: New York University Press, pp. 198–225.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, D. (2009), ‘Making things the same: gases, emissions rights and the politics of carbon markets’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 34(3/4): 440–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meinshausen, M., Meinshausen, N., Hare, W., Raper, S.C.B., Frieler, K., Knutti, R., Frame, D.J.Allen, M.J. (2009), ‘Greenhouse-gas emissions targets for limiting global warming to 2°C’, Nature 458: 1158–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalf, G.E. (2009), ‘Market-based policy options to control U.S. greenhouse gas emissions’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 23(2): 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordhaus, W.D. (2007), ‘To tax or not to tax: alternative approaches to slowing global warming’, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 1(1): 26–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, J. (2007), Markets, Deliberation and Environment, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Paavola, J.Adger, W.N. (2006), ‘Fair adaptation to climate change’, Ecological Economics 56(4): 594–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, E.A. (2011), ‘Cashing in on climate change: political theory and global emissions trading’, Critical Review of International, Social and Political Philosophy 14(1): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paterson, M. (2010), ‘Legitimation and accumulation in climate change governance’, New Political Economy 15(3): 345–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogge, T. (2002), World Poverty and Human Rights, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Rose, C.M. (1999), ‘Expanding the choices for the global commons: comparing newfangled tradable allowance schemes to old-fashioned common property regimes’, Duke Environmental Law and Policy Forum 10(1): 45–72.Google Scholar
Sagoff, M. (2002), ‘Controlling global climate: the debate over pollution trading’, in V.V. Gehring and W.A. Galston (eds), Philosophical Dimensions of Public Policy, London: Transaction Publishers, pp. 311–318.Google Scholar
Sandel, M. (2005), Public Philosophy: Essays on Morality in Politics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Satz, D. (2010), Why Some Things Should Not Be for Sale: The Moral Limits of Markets, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, P. (2002), One World: The Ethics of Globalization, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Solomon, S., Qin, D.Manning, M. (2007), ‘Technical summary’, in S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, K. Marquis, K. Averyt, M. Tignor, H.L. Miller Jr., and Z. Chen (eds), Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19–91.Google Scholar
Spash, C. (2010), ‘The brave new world of carbon trading’, New Political Economy 15(2): 169–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stavins, R.N. (2008), ‘Addressing climate change with a comprehensive US cap-and-trade system’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 24(2): 298–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, N. (2009), A Blueprint for a Safer Planet, London: Bodley Head.Google Scholar
Stripple, J.Lövbrand, E. (2010), ‘Carbon market governance beyond the public-private divide’, in F. Biermann, P. Pattberg and F. Zelli (eds), Global Climate Governance Beyond 2012: Architectures, Agency and Adaptation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 165–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tans, P. (2010), Trends in Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide, Boulder, CO: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association, from http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/Google Scholar
Tickell, O. (2008), Kyoto2, London: Zed Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tietenberg, T. (2006), Emissions Trading: Principles and Practice, 2nd edn., Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
Torres, G. (2002), ‘Who owns the sky?’, Pace Environmental Law Review 19(2): 515–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UK Government (2008), ‘Climate change Act of 2008 (C.27)’. Retrieved 5 December 2010 from http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2008/ukpga_20080027_en_1Google Scholar
UK Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) (2009), ‘The UK low carbon transition plan: national strategy for climate and energy’. Retrieved 5 December 2010 from http://www.decc.gov.uk/assets/decc/white%20papers/uk%20low%20carbon%20transition%20plan%20wp09/1_20090724153238_e_@@_lowcarbontransitionplan.pdfGoogle Scholar
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (2009), ‘Copenhagen Accord (Draft Decision -/CP.15)’. Retrieved 5 December 2010 from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2009/cop15/eng/11a01.pdfpage=4Google Scholar
US Congress (2009), ‘American clean air and security act of 2009 (H.R. 2454)’. Retrieved 5 December 2010 from http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=111_cong_bills&docid=f:h2454pcs.txt.pdfGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J. (2000), ‘What is cosmopolitan?’, Journal of Political Philosophy 8(2): 227–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, A. (2001), ‘Are market norms and intrinsic valuation mutually exclusive’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79(4): 525–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar