Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T00:39:04.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Irreparable ignorance, protean power, and economics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2020

George F. DeMartino Open the ORCID record for George F. DeMartino [Opens in a new window]  and
Ilene Grabel
George F. DeMartino*
Affiliation:
University of Denver, Denver, CO, USA
Ilene Grabel
Affiliation:
University of Denver, Denver, CO, USA
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: George.Demartino@du.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The ongoing crisis in mainstream economics has opened the door to recognition of true uncertainty. Economists are increasingly embracing uncertainty and tracing its implications for responsible economic practice and policy design that foregrounds rather than dismisses the limits to knowledge. Protean Power (PP) promotes a similar shift in international relations. PP advances a key distinction between operational and radical uncertainty. We argue that a complementary and perhaps more productive way to theorize the epistemic insufficiency facing agents as they map and implement strategies is to distinguish between ‘reparable’ and ‘irreparable’ ignorance, which leads to ‘Hirschmanian’ pragmatism.

Keywords

uncertaintyirreparable ignoranceHirschmanian pragmatismmainstream economics
Type
Symposium: Protean Power: Exploring the Uncertain and Unexpected in World Politics: Edited by Jacques E. C. Hymans
Information
International Theory , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , November 2020 , pp. 435 - 448
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Best, Jacqueline. 2005. The Limits of Transparency: Ambiguity and the History of International Finance. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Best, Jacqueline. 2008. “Ambiguity, Uncertainty, and Risk: Rethinking Indeterminacy.” International Political Sociology 2 (4):355–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blyth, Mark. 2009. “Coping With the Black Swan: The Unsettling World of Nassim Taleb.” Critical Review 21 (4):447–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brigden, Noelle K., and Andreas, Peter. 2018. “Border Collision: Power Dynamics of Enforcement and Evasion across the US–Mexico Line.” In Protean Power: Exploring the Uncertain and Unexpected in World Politics, edited by Katzenstein, Peter J. and Seybert, Lucia A., 100–23. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Benjamin J. 2009. “A Grave Case of Myopia.” International Interactions 35 (4):436–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colander, David. 2003. “Muddling Through and Policy Analysis.” New Zealand Economic Papers 37 (2):197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colander, David, and Kupers, Roland. 2016. Complexity and the Art of Public Policy: Solving Society's Problems from the Bottom Up. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deaton, Angus, and Cartwright, Nancy. 2018. “Understanding and Misunderstanding Randomized Control Trials.” Social Science & Medicine 210:2–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeMartino, George F. 2011. The Economist's Oath: On the Need for and Content of Professional Economic Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeMartino, George F. 2013a. “Epistemic Aspects of Economic Practice and the Need for Professional Economic Ethics.” Review of Social Economy 71 (2):166–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeMartino, George F. 2013b. “Ethical Engagement in a World Beyond Control.” Rethinking Marxism 25 (4):483–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeMartino, George F. 2018. “Reconstructing Globalization in an Illiberal Era.” Ethics and International Affairs 32 (3):361–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeMartino, George F. 2020. “The Confounding of the Counterfactual in Economic Explanation.” Review of Social Economy. doi: 10.1080/00346764.2020.1735649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterly, William. 2008. “Introduction: Can't Take It Anymore?” In Reinventing Foreign Aid, edited by Easterly, William, 1–44. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Economist. 2018. “Our Pick of the Decade's Eight Best Young Economists.” Economist, December 18. https://www.economist.com/christmas-specials/2018/12/18/our-pick-of-the-decades-eight-best-young-economists.Google Scholar
El-Erian, Mohamed A. 2019. “Why Economics Must Get Broader Before It Gets Better.” Project Syndicate, March 8. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/mainstream-economics-must-learn-from-others-by-mohamed-a--el-erian-2019-03.Google Scholar
Ellerman, David. 2005. Helping People Help Themselves. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsner, Wolfram. 2017. “Complexity Economics as Heterodoxy: Theory and Policy.” Journal of Economic Issues 11 (4):939–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabel, Ilene. 2000. “The Political Economy of ‘Policy Credibility’: The New-classical Macroeconomics and the Remaking of Emerging Economies.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 24 (1):1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabel, Ilene. 2017. When Things Don't Fall Apart: Global Financial Governance and Developmental Finance in an Age of Productive Incoherence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grabel, Ilene. 2018. “Reflections on the Economics Profession, the Neoliberal Conjuncture, and the Emerging Democratic Crisis: An Analysis in the Spirit of Albert O. Hirschman.” Forum for Social Economics 47 (2):173–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzzini, Stefano. 2017. “International Political Sociology, or the Social Ontology and Power Politics of Process.” In Routledge Handbook of International Political Sociology, edited by Guillaume, Xavier and Bilgin, Pinar, 368–77. Abingdon, Oxon, and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich. 2014 [1944]. The Road to Serfdom. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O., and Lindblom, Charles. 1971 [1962]. “Economic Development, Research and Development and Policy Making: Some Converging Views.” In A Bias for Hope: Essays on Development and Latin America, edited by Hirschman, Albert O., 63–84. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J., and Seybert, Lucia A.. 2018a. “Uncertainty, Risk, Power and the Limits of International Relations Theory.” In Protean Power: Exploring the Uncertain and Unexpected in World Politics, edited by Katzenstein, Peter J. and Seybert, Lucia A., 27–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J., and Seybert, Lucia A.. 2018b. “Power Complexities and Political Theory.” In Protean Power: Exploring the Uncertain and Unexpected in World Politics, edited by Katzenstein, Peter J. and Seybert, Lucia A., 267–301. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J., and Nelson, Stephen C.. 2013. “Worlds in Collision: Uncertainty and Risk in Hard Times.” In Politics in the New Hard Times: The Great Recession in Comparative Perspective, edited by Kahler, Miles and Lake, David A., 233–52. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard. 1937. “The General Theory of Employment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 51 (2):209–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, Frank. 1971 [1921]. Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kotz, David M., McDonough, Terence, and Reich, Michael. eds. 1994. Social Structures of Accumulation: The Political Economy of Growth and Crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Abba. 1944. The Economics of Control. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Charles. 1959. “The Science of ‘Muddling Through’.” Public Administration Review 19 (2):79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockwood, Erin, and Nelson, Stephen C.. 2018. “Incomplete Control: The Circulation of Power in Finance.” In Protean Power: Exploring the Uncertain and Unexpected in World Politics, edited by Katzenstein, Peter J. and Seybert, Lucia A., 166–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchau, Vincent A. W. J., Walker, Warren E., Bloemen, Pieteer J. T. M., and Popper, Steven W.. eds. 2019. Decision Making under Deep Uncertainty: From Theory to Practice. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, Deirdre. 1990. If You're So Smart: A Narrative of Economic Expertise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, Barak. 2018. “Terrorism and Protean Power: How Terrorists Navigate Uncertainty.” In Protean Power: Exploring the Uncertain and Unexpected in World Politics, edited by Katzenstein, Peter J. and Seybert, Lucia A., 188–208. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Julie. 2004. “Clocks, Creation and Clarity: Insights on Ethics and Economics From a Feminist Perspective.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7:381–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 2007. One Economics, Many Recipes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 2009. “The New Development Economics: We Shall Experiment, But how Shall We Learn?” In What Works in Development? Thinking Big and Thinking Small, edited by Cohen, Jessica and Easterly, William, 24–47. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 2015. Economics Rules: The Rights and Wrongs of the Dismal Science. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Ruccio, David F., and Amariglio, Jack. 2003. Postmodern Moments in Modern Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scoones, Ian. 2019. What Is Uncertainty and Why Does It Matter? STEPS Working Paper No. 105. Brighton: STEPS Centre, University of Sussex. https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/bitstream/handle/20.500.12413/14470/STEPSWP_105_Scoones_final.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.Google Scholar
Seybert, Lucia A., and Katzenstein, Peter J.. 2018a. “Protean Power and Control Power: Conceptual Analysis.” In Protean Power: Exploring the Uncertain and Unexpected in World Politics, edited by Katzenstein, Peter J. and Seybert, Lucia A., 3–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seybert, Lucia A., and Katzenstein, Peter J.. 2018b. “High-Tech: Power and Unpredictability at the Technological Frontier and Bitcoin.” In Protean Power: Exploring the Uncertain and Unexpected in World Politics, edited by Katzenstein, Peter J. and Seybert, Lucia A., 124–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seybert, Lucia A., Nelson, Stephen C., and Katzenstein, Peter J.. 2018. “Slumdog Versus Superman: Uncertainty, Innovation, and the Circulation of Power in the Global Film Industry.” In Protean Power: Exploring the Uncertain and Unexpected in World Politics, edited by Katzenstein, Peter J. and Seybert, Lucia A., 209–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shackle, G. L. S. 1992 [1972]. Epistemics and Economics: A Critique of Economic Doctrines. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1976 [1759]. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Stirling, Andy. 2018. “Uncertainty.” In Companion to Environmental Studies, edited by Castree, Noel, Hulme, Mike and Proctor, James D., 120–06. Abingdon, Oxon and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taleb, Nassim Nicholas. 2007. The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Taleb, Nassim Nicholas. 2012. Anti-Fragile: Things That Gain from Disorder. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Wade, Robert H. 2009. “Beware What You Wish For: Lessons for International Political Economy From the Transformation of Economics.” Review of International Political Economy 16 (1):106–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar