Last updated 09/07/24: Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website: https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2022
Having lost Transcaucasia to the Russians some one-hundred-and-fifty years ago, Persian scholars have ignored the history of this region which once was a part of Iran under the Qajars. Russian and Armenian sources, although numerous, have tended to emphasize Russian rule in the area. They have also failed to utilize primary sources, such as those in archives, have neglected to record the favorable aspects, and instead have concentrated on a blanket condemnation of Persian rule in the Caucasus. Although it is true that Muslim rule, especially in the Qajar era, was particularly oppressive towards the Christian population of Transcaucasia, some bright moments did exist. This study, based on primary and archival sources, focuses on one such period in a specific area: the governorship of Ḥusayn Qulī Khān Qazvinī in the Khanate of Erevan (Eastern Armenia) during the first quarter of the nineteenth century. Before discussing the khān's twenty-year tenure in Erevan, a biographical and historical sketch is in order.
An earlier version of this article was presented at the Ninth Annual Meeting of the Middle East Studies Association in Louisville, Kentucky, November 1975.
1. Bāmdād, M. Sharḥ-i hāl-i rijāl-i Īrān dar qurūn-i 12, 13, va 14 hijrī, I (Tehran, 1969), 402.Google Scholar
2. Fasā'ī, H. Fārsnāmah-i Nāṣirī, trans, by Busse, H. (New York, 1972), pp. 77-91.Google Scholar
3. von Freygang, F. Letters from the Caucasus and Georgia: The Account of a Journey into Persia in 1812 (London, 1823), p. 284.Google Scholar
4. Ormanian, M. Azgapatum, III (Jerusalem, 1927), 3481Google Scholar; Eritsiants, A Amenayn hayots katoghikosutiune ev Kovkasi hayk xix darum, I (Tiflis, 1894), 184.Google Scholar
5. Sipihr, N. Nāsikh al-tavārīkh, I (Tehran, 1964), 119-124.Google Scholar
6. Bāmdād, op. cit., I, 404.
7. Hidāyat, R. Tārīkh-i rawzat al-ṣafā, IX (Tehran, 1961), 288-290.Google Scholar
8. Bāmdād, op. cit., I, 330.
9. For the complete text of the treaty see Hurewitz, J. Diplomacy in the Near and Middle East, A Documentary Record, 1535-1941, I (Princeton, 1956), 84-86.Google Scholar
10. Alexander (Iskandar), a son of Iraklii II, King of Georgia, had sought refuge in Persia, following the annexation of his country by the Russians. He hoped to regain his ancestral throne and was aided by the Persians. For details of his actions, see Monteith, W. Kars and Erzeroum: With the Campaigns of Prince Paskevitch, 1828-1829 (London, 1856), pp. 72-78Google Scholar; Allen, W. E. D. A History of the Georgian People (New York, 1932), pp. 215-216.Google Scholar
11. Avery, P. W. “An Enquiry into the Outbreak of the Second Russo-Persian War, 1826-1828,” Iran and Islam, ed. by Bosworth, C. E. (Chicago, 1971),pp. 21-25Google Scholar; Kiy, M. “Muqaddamāt-i jang-i duvvum-i Īrān va Rūsiyah,” Barrasīhā-yi Tarikhi, IX (2) (1974), 49-78Google Scholar; Potto, V. Kavkazskaia voina v otdel'nykh ocherkakh, epizodakh, legendakh i biografiiakh, III (St. Petersburg, 1888), 6.Google Scholar A valuable source for the wars of the period is Butkov, P. G. Materialy dlia novoi istorii Kavkaza (St. Petersburg, 1869).Google Scholar General Tsitsianov was treacherously killed by the governor of Bākū, Ḥusayn, during the surrender of that city in 1806; for details see Baddeley, J. F. The Russian Conquest of the Caucasus (London, 1908), pp. 70-71.Google Scholar
12. The insurrection of December 14, 1825 was a weak attempt to reform the Russian state. Although it failed, the ideals it stood for were not destroyed, Florinsky, M. T. Russia, A History and an Interpretation, II (New York, 1970), 745-752.Google Scholar For further details see Shchegolev, P. E. Nikolai I i dekabristy (Petrograd, 1919)Google Scholar and his Dekabristy (Moscow-Leningrad, 1926).Google Scholar
13. For further details, see Nersisian, N. Dekabristnere Hayastanum (Erevan, 1958), pp. 5-60.Google Scholar
14. The site of the Holy See of the Armenians, Uch-Kilisa means “three churches” in Turkish and refers to the monastery of Echmiadzin (which in Armenian means “the ‘Only Begotten’ descended”) and the two adjoining churches of St. Rhipsime and St. Gayane.
15. Kavkazskaia Arkeograficheskaia Kommissiia, Akty sobrannye Kavkazskoiu Arkheograficheskoiu Kommissieiu, VI, pt. 1 (Tiflis, 1868), 525-526, pt. 2, 394-396.Google Scholar
16. For further details on the Russian campaign see Potto, op. cit., III, 343-520.
17. Hurewitz, op. cit., I, 99.
18. The full text of the treaty can be found in Hurewitz, op. cit., I, 96-102.
19. Ibid.
20. Potto, op. cit., I, 311.
21. Alboyajian, A. Patmakan Hayastani sahmannere (Cairo, 1950), p. 379.Google Scholar
22. Bāmdād, op. cit., I, 404.
23. Morier, J. A Second Journey Through Persia, Armenia, and Asia Minor to Constantinople Between the Years 1810-1816, II (London, 1818), 313.Google Scholar
24. Ker-Porter, R. Travels in Georgia, Persia, Armenia, Ancient Babylonia, During the Years 1817-1820, I (London, 1821), 202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Potto, op. cit., III, 16.
26. von Kotzebue, M. Musāfirat bi Iran bi ma˓īyat-i safīr kabīr-i Rūsīyah dar sāl-i 1817 (Tehran, 1930), p. 70.Google Scholar
27. Ker-Porter, op. cit., I, 201-202; Morier, op. cit., II, 321.
28. Hambly, G. “An Introduction to the Economic Organization of Early Qajar Iran,” Iran (2, 1964), 76CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rabino di Borgomale, H. L. Coins, Medals, and Seals of the Shahs of Iran, 1500-1941 (Hertford, 1945), pp. 62-65.Google Scholar Samples of the coins are available in the Museum of the History of the City of Erevan.
29. Shopen, I. (Chopin), Istoricheskii pamiatnik sostoyaniia Armianskoi oblasti v epokhu ee prisoedineniia k Rossiiskoi imperii (St. Petersburg, 1852), pp. 452-453.Google Scholar This work is the major primary source on the Khanate of Erevan. Shopen was commissioned by the Russian government to survey the newly conquered area of Eastern Armenia. He had access to the tax rolls of Mirza Isma'il, the last Persian treasurer of Erevan, and to other surveys collected orally from the population.
30. Morier, op. cit., II, 322-323; Lapidus, I. M. Muslim Cities in the Later Middle Ages (Harvard, 1967), p. 20.Google Scholar
31. Sjoberg, G. The Preindustrial City (New York, 1965), p. 118.Google Scholar
32. Shopen, op. cit., pp. 519-537.
33. Ibid., pp. 449-459.
34. Ibid., pp. 718-722.
35. Ibid., pp. 1155-1182.
36. Ker-Porter, op. cit., I, 200-201.
37. Aghayan, D. P. et al., eds., Hay zhoghovrdi patmutiun, V (Erevan, 1974), 13-18.Google Scholar
38. Hakobian, T. Kh. Erevani patmutiune, 1801-1879 Erevan, 1959), pp. 20-22.Google Scholar
39. Abovian, Kh. Erkeri liakatar zhoghovatsu, III (Erevan, 1947), 58.Google Scholar The above is also confirmed by Alishan, Gh. Ayrarat (Venice, 1890), p. 308.Google Scholar
40. Shopen, op. cit., pp. 635-636.
41. Morier, op. cit., II, 321.
42. The Archives of the Catholicosate; now integrated into the Archives of the Matenadaran, Erevan, Armenian SSR, Persian MSS. 580, fol. 1d; MSS. 614, fol. le.
43. Matenadaran Archives, Persian MSS. 613, fol. le.
