Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T10:39:29.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

AN ARCHITECTURAL ANALYSIS OF THE SEALAND BUILDING AT TELL KHAIBER, SOUTHERN IRAQ

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2020

Mary Shepperson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper analyses the architecture of the large fortified building excavated at Tell Khaiber in southern Iraq, the first known example of monumental architecture from the Sealand Kingdom. It examines the development of this highly unusual building, analyses the spatial properties and apparent functions of the structure, reviews possible architectural parallels, and considers what the architecture might reveal about Tell Khaiber's role in the context of the Sealand state. The outer form and organisation of the building indicate a fortified structure with a high priority afforded to defence. The interior of the Tell Khaiber building is divided between a smaller, earlier structure, enclosing conventionally arranged architecture with apparently executive and administrative functions, and a larger extension, densely packed with accommodation for a large number of personnel. When considered alongside textual sources on the Sealand state, which provide evidence about the geo-political context in which the Tell Khaiber building was constructed, it is possible to suggest the role such a building may have had in the development of the Sealand Kingdom. The form of the Tell Khaiber building may also be important in understanding the nature of the contested border between the Sealand Kingdom and its Babylonian neighbours.

Type
Research Article
Information
IRAQ , Volume 82 , December 2020 , pp. 207 - 226
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akkermans, P. M. M. G., Limpens, J. and Spoor, R. H.. 1993. “On the frontier of Assyria: Excavations at Tell Sabi Abyad, 1991.” Akkadica 84–85: 1–52.Google Scholar
al-Dafar, A. 2015. Shadow States: The Archaeology of Power in the Marshes of Southern Mesopotamia. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Stony Brook University, New York.Google Scholar
Boivin, O. 2018. The First Dynasty of the Sealand in Mesopotamia. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breckwoldt, T. 1996. “Management of Grain Storage in Old Babylonian Larsa.” Archiv für Orientforschung 42/43: 64–88.Google Scholar
Calderbank, D. and Moon, J.. 2017. “A Ceramic Assemblage of the Early Literate Periods from Sumer” in Heffron, Y., Stone, A. and Worthington, M., eds., At the Dawn of History: Ancient Near Eastern Studies in Honour of J. N. Postgate. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns, pp. 73–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, S., Moon, J., Killick, R., Calderbank, D., Robson, E., Shepperson, M. and Slater, F.. 2017. “Tell Khaiber: An administrative centre of the Sealand Period.” Iraq 79: 21–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalley, S. 2009. “Babylonian Tablets from the First Sealand Dynasty in the Schøyen Collection.” Cornell University Studies in Assyriology and Sumerology (CUSAS) 9: 1–17.Google Scholar
Düring, B. S. 2015. “Reassessing the Dunnu Institution in the Context of the Middle Assyrian Empire.” Ancient Near East Studies 52: 47–68.Google Scholar
Hillier, B. and Hanson, J.. 1984. The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koliński, R. 2002. Tell al-Fakhar: A dimtu-Settlement or the City of Kurruḫanni?” Studies on the Civilization and Culture of Nuzi and the Hurrians 12: 3–39.Google Scholar
Koliński, R. 2001. Mesopotamian dimātu of the Second Millennium BC. BAR International Series 1004. Oxford: BAR Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margueron, J.-C. 1982. Recherche sur les palais mésopotamiens de l’âge du bronze. Paris: Librairie Orientaliste Paul Geuthner.Google Scholar
Ostwald, M. J. 2011. “The Mathematics of Spatial Configuration: Revisiting, Revising and Critiquing Justified Plan Graph Theory.” Nexus Network Journal 13(2): 445–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pournelle, J. 2003. Marshland of Cities: Deltaic Landscapes and the Evolution of Early Mesopotamian Civilization. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Richardson, S. 2005. “Trouble in the countryside ANA TARṢI Samsuditanna: Militarism, Kassites and the fall of Babylon I” in Van Soldt, W. H., ed., Ethnicity in Ancient Mesopotamia. Papers Read at the 48th Rencontre Assyriologique Internationale, Leiden 1–4 July 2002. Leiden: Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten, pp. 273–287.Google Scholar
Stone, E. 1977. “Economic Crisis and Social Upheaval in Old Babylonian Nippur” in Young, T. C. Jr. and Levine, L. D., eds., Mountains and Lowlands: Essays on the Archaeology of Greater Mesopotamia. Malibu: Undena Press, pp. 267–289.Google Scholar
Trzciński, J., Zaremba, M., Rzepka, S., Bogusz, W., Godlewski, T. and Szczepański, T.. 2017. “Preliminary back-analysis of the height of mud brick fortifications based on geoarchaeological data at Tell el-Retaba site in Egypt.” Studia Quaternaria 34(2): 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Lerberghe, K., Kaniewski, D., Abraham, K., Guiot, J. and Campo, E. Van. 2017. “Water deprivation as military strategy in the Middle East, 3.700 years ago.” Méditerranée (Online: https://journals.openedition.org/mediterranee/8000).Google Scholar
Woolley, L. and Mallowan, M.. 1976. Ur Excavations Volume VII. The Old Babylonian Period. London: British Museum.Google Scholar
Wright, H. T. 1981. “The Southern Margins of Sumer: An Archaeological Survey of the Areas of Eridu and Ur” in Adams, R. M., Heartland of Cities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 295–338.Google Scholar