Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:57:16.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The introduction of wheel cutting as a technique for engraving cylinder seals: its distinction from filing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2014

Extract

It has been recognized in glyptic and other studies (for example Ogden, 1982 and Gorelick and Gwinnett, 1992) that considerable advances in engraving technology were made once the bow drill, originally used vertically with a cap stone, had been adapted so that a cutting wheel could be fitted to a spindle mounted between fixed bearings (an arrangement similar to a “horizontal engraving spindle” or a “fixed lapidary lathe”). In some recent publications it has been suggested that this key innovation occurred as early as the fourth millennium B.C. (see for example Nissen, 1977; Collon, 1986; Gorelick and Gwinnett, 1992). In this paper we present some observations which we have made on Mesopotamian cylinder seals; they suggest that the introduction of the wheel occurred considerably later, probably not until the Old Babylonian period in the first half of the second millennium.

The designs engraved in intaglio around the convex sides of cylinder seals have been extensively studied by antiquarians and archaeologists since the end of the eighteenth century (see Collon, 1987). More recently consideration has been given to the techniques used to shape and polish the seals and to drill their perforations. The seals were usually made from natural minerals or stones and some of the major lapidary methods employed in Mesopotamia during the 3000 years or so of cylinder seal production, a time span which stretched from the Chalcolithic period to the Iron Age, have been identified (Gorelick and Gwinnett, 1978 and 1989 etc). Advances in lapidary methods, which allowed harder stones such as hematite and subsequently quartz to be commonly worked for seals during the second millennium, appear to reflect the advantages gained by the availability of emery, a more efficient abrasive material than quartz (Heimpel et al., 1988). Other advantages appear to have been gained by the change from stone-based lapidary techniques to those employing metal (copper alloy) tools (Gwinnett and Gorelick, 1987).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 1994 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Department of Scientific Research British Museum, London, WC1B 3DG

References

Bimson, M., Sax, M., 1982. The materials of the seals. In Collon, D., Catalogue of the Western Asiatic Seals in the British Museum, Cylinder Seals II, Akkadian, Post Akkakadian, Ur III periods, British Museum Publications, London.Google Scholar
Buchanan, B., 1970. Cylinder seal impressions in the Yale Babylonian collection illustrating a revolution in art circa 1700 B.C., Yale University Library Gazette, 5365.Google Scholar
Collon, D., 1987. First Impressions, British Museum Publications, London.Google Scholar
Collon, D., 1990. Near Eastern Seals, British Museum Publications, London.Google Scholar
Gorelick, L., Gwinnett, A. J., 1978. Ancient seals and modern science, Expedition, 20, 3847.Google Scholar
Gorelick, L., Gwinnett, A. J., 1989. Technological improvements in ancient seal manufacture, Pact 23(1.3), 2940.Google Scholar
Gorelick, L., Gwinnett, A. J., 1992. Minoan versus Mesopotamian seals: comparative methods of manufacture, Iraq, 54, 5764.Google Scholar
Gwinnett, A. J., Gorelick, L., 1987. The change from stone drills to copper drills in Mesopotamia, Expedition 29, 1524.Google Scholar
Heimpel, W., Gorelick, L., Gwinnett, A. J., 1988. Philological and archaeological evidence for the use of emery in the Bronze Age Near East, Journal of Cuneiform Studies, 40, 195210.Google Scholar
Nissen, H. J., 1977. Aspects of the development of early cylinder seals. In Gibson, M., Biggs, R. D. (eds.), Seals and Sealing in the Ancient Near East, Bibliotheca Mesopotamica 6, 1523, Undena Publications, Malibu.Google Scholar
Ogden, J., 1982. Jewellery of the Ancient World. Trefoil Books, London.Google Scholar
Sax, M., 1986. The materials of the seals. In Collon, D., Catalogue of the Western Asiatic Seals in the British Museum, Cylinder Seals, III, Isin-Larsa and Old Babylonian Periods, British Museum Publications, London.Google Scholar
Sax, M., 1991, The composition of the materials of first millennium B.C. cylinder seals from Western Asia. In Budd, P. et al. (eds), Archaeological Sciences 1989, 104–14, Oxbow monograph ser. 9, Oxford.Google Scholar
Sax, M., in preparation a. The materials of the seals. In Collon, D., Catalogue of the Western Asiatic Seals in the British Museum, Cylinder Seals I, Uruk, Jemdet Nasr and Early Dynastic Periods, British Museum Press, London.Google Scholar
Sax, M., in preparation b. The materials of the seals. In Porada, E., Collon, D., Catalogue of the Western Asiatic Seals in the British Museum, Cylinder Seals IV, Mitannian, Kassite, Middle Assyrian and other Second Millennium Styles, British Museum Press, London.Google Scholar
Sax, M., in preparation c. The materials of the seals. In Collon, D., Merrillees, P. H., Catalogue of the Western Asiatic Seals in the British Museum, Cylinder Seals V, Neo-Assyrian, Neo-Babylonian and Achaemenid Periods, British Museum Press, London.Google Scholar
Sax, M., Meeks, N. D., 1995 (in press). Methods of engraving Mesopotamian quartz cylinder seals, Archaeometry 37(1).Google Scholar
Sax, M., Middleton, A. P., 1992. A system of nomenclature for quartz and its application to the material of cylinder seals, Archaeometry 34, 1120.Google Scholar
Tosi, M., Piperno, M., 1973. Lithic technology behind the ancient lapis lazuli trade, Expedition 16, 1523.Google Scholar
Ward, W. H., 1910. The Seal Cylinders of Western Asia, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Publication 100, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar