Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:49:33.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Making Tablets or Taking Tablets? ṭuppa/u ṣabātu in Assyria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2014

Nicholas Postgate
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Middle Assyrian texts have a phrase ṭuppa ṣab¯atu, which is usually understood to mean “to take (possession of) a tablet”. There is a corresponding type of tablet called a ṭuppu ṣabittu (plural (ṭuppatu ṣabbutātu). This article contends that ṭuppa ṣabātu is a technical term for drawing up a formal document, and that ṭuppu ṣabittu is a “formally drawn-up tablet”, normally if not invariably involving at least one seal impression, used both in private commercial contexts and in public administration. It is further maintained that this usage survives into Neo-Assyrian times, when its most frequent (but not exclusive) usage is at the end of a legal document where a witness (often identified as a scribe) is described as ṣābit ṭuppi: this has been understood to mean that this scribe retained possession of the document, or that a third party “kept” the document. In the light of the fresh Middle Assyrian evidence, it is preferable to see it as referring to the scribe “who drew up the document”.

Type
Research Article
Information
IRAQ , Volume 73 , 2011 , pp. 149 - 160
Copyright
The British Institute for the Study of Iraq © 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmad, A. Y. and Postgate, J. N. 2007. Archives from the Domestic Wing of the North-West Place at Kalhu INimrud. Edubba 10. London: Nabu.Google Scholar
Blau, J. 1979. Redundant pronominal suffixes denoting intrinsic possession. Journal of the Ancient Near Eastern Society 11: 31–37.Google Scholar
Borger, R. 2003. Mesopotamisches Zeichenlexikon. Alter Orient und Altes Testament 305. Münster: Ugarit Verlag.Google Scholar
Brinkman, J. A. 1976. Materials and Studies for Kassite History 1. Chicago: Oriental Institute.Google Scholar
Donbaz, V. and Parpola, S. 2001. Neo-Assyrian Legal Texts in Istanbul. Studien zu den Assur-Texten 2. Saarbrücken: Saarbrücker Druckerei und Verlag.Google Scholar
Faist, B. 2007. Alltagstexte aus neuassyrischen Archiven und Bibliotheken der Stadt Assur. Studien zu den Assur-Texten 3. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Fales, F. M. and Jakob-Rost, L. 1991. Neo-Assyrian texts from Assur. Private archives in the Vorderasiatisches Museum of Berlin. Part I. State Archives of Assyria Bulletin 5: 1–155.Google Scholar
Freydank, H. F. 1976. Mittelassyrische Rechtsurkunden und Verwaltungstexte. Vorderasiatische Schriftdenkmäler der Staatlichen Museen zu Berlin, NF III. Berlin: Akademie.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freydank, H. F. 1992. Das Archiv 18764. Altorientalische Forschungen 19: 276–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freydank, H. F. 1997. bitqī batāqu “Abschneidungen abschneiden”. Altorientalische Forschungen: 105–14.Google Scholar
Freydank, H. F. 2001. Mittelassyrische Rechtsurkunden und Verwaltungstexte IV. Wissenschaftliche Veröffentlichungen der Deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft 99. Saarbrücken: Saarbrücker Druckerei und Verlag.Google Scholar
Friedrich, J., Meyer, G. R., Ungnad, A. and Weidner, E. F. 1940. Die Inschriften vom Teil Halaf. Archiv für Orientforschung Beiheft 6. Berlin.Google Scholar
Grayson, A. K. 1991. Assyrian Rulers of the Early First Millennium BC, I (1114–859 BC). Royal Inscriptions of Mesopotamia, Assyrian Periods 2. Toronto, Buffalo, London: University of Toronto.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurney, O. R. 1983. The Middle Babylonian Legal and Economic Texts from Ur. London: British School of Archaeology in Iraq.Google Scholar
Hall, M. 1983. A Middle-Assyrian legal summons. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie 73: 75–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, D. I. and Watanabe, K. 1983. Eine neubabylonische Gartenkaufurkunde mit Fluchen. Orlens Antiquus 22: 37–48.Google Scholar
Postgate, J. N. 1970. More “Assyrian Deeds and Documents”. Iraq 32: 129–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postgate, J. N. 1976. Fifty Neo-Assyrian Legal Documents. Warminster: Aris and Phillips.Google Scholar
Postgate, J. N. 1986. Middle Assyrian tablets: the instruments of bureaucracy. Altorientalische Forschungen 13: 10–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postgate, J. N. 1988. The Archive of Urad-Šerua and his Family: A Middle Assyrian Household in Government Service. Rome: Herder.Google Scholar
Radner, K. 1997. Die neuassyrischen Privatrechtsurkunden als Quelle für Mensch und Umwelt. State Archives of Assyria Studies 6. Helsinki: Neo-Assyrian Text Corpus Project.Google Scholar
Postgate, J. N. 1999. Ein neuassyrisches Privatarchiv der Tempelgoldschmiede von Assur. Studien zu den Assur-Texten 1. Saarbrücken: Saarbrücker Druckerei und Verlag.Google Scholar
Postgate, J. N. 2002. Die neuassyrischen Texte aus Tall Šēḫ Hamad. Berichte der Ausgrabung Tall Šēḫ Hamad / Dūr-katlimmu, Band 6 Texte 2. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Saggs, H. W. F. 1959. The Nimrud Letters, 1952–Part V. Iraq 21: 158–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saggs, H. W. F. 2001. The Nimrud Letters, 1952. Cuneiform Texts from Nimrud 5. London: British School of Archaeology in Iraq.Google Scholar
Snell, D. C. 1983–1984. The cuneiform tablet from El-Qiṭār. Abr-Nahrain 22: 159–70.Google Scholar
Speleers, L. 1925. Recueil des Inscriptions de l'Asie Antérieure des Musées Royaux du Cinquantenaire à Bruxelles. Textes sumériens, babyloniens et assyriens. Brussels.Google Scholar
Wiggermann, F. A. M. 1992. Mesopotamian Protective Spirits. The Ritual Texts. Groningen: Styx.Google Scholar