Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T14:39:54.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ministers, bishops and the changing balance of power in Irish education 1950–70

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2015

John Walsh
John Walsh*
Affiliation:
School of Education, Trinity College, Dublin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This study explores how power over primary and post-primary education was contested between a traditional Catholic elite and the Irish state during a period of far-reaching educational reform. The interaction between successive ministers for education and the Catholic bishops was a constant feature of the politics of educational expansion, but it was an uneasy and volatile relationship, which sometimes shaded into hostility. Power was contested between a newlyassertive Department of Education and the clerical managers or religious orders who traditionally controlled the schools. The Catholic Church did not react to policy change as a monolithic entity: divisions emerged within the traditional elite under the strain of adapting to unprecedented policy change, underlined by significant tensions between the bishops and the Catholic managerial authorities. A traditional consensus on the predominance of the Catholic Church in education disappeared, to be replaced by a new balance of power in which the state both contested with traditional stakeholders and collaborated uneasily with them to advance educational reform.

Type
Research Article
Information
Irish Historical Studies , Volume 38 , Issue 149 , May 2012 , pp. 108 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © Irish Historical Studies Publications Ltd 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The role of the Protestant churches in education is not examined in this article but is considered in Walsh, JohnThe politics of expansion: the transformation of educational policy in the Republic of Ireland (Manchester, 2009), pp 144–6.Google Scholar

2 Whyte, J.H.Church and state in modern Ireland (2nd ed., Dublin, 1980), p. 17.Google Scholar

3 Ibid., p. 340.

4 Buachalla, Séamus ÓEducation policy in twentieth century Ireland (Dublin, 1988), p. 233.Google Scholar

5 Dáil Éireann deb,, clix, 1494 (19 July 1956).

6 Buachalla, ÓEducation policy, p. 274.Google Scholar

7 O’Sullivan, J.M. T.D., minister for education, to Dr D. Keane, bishop of Limerick, 31 Oct. 1930 in Hyland, Áine and Milne, Kenneth (eds), Irish educational documents, volume 2: selection of extracts from documents relating to the history of education from 1922 to 1991 in the Irish Free State and the Republic of Ireland (Dublin, 1992), pp 219–22.Google Scholar

8 Walsh, Politics of expansion, p. 2.Google Scholar

9 I wish to acknowledge the comments of Dr Ciara Breathnach on this point.

10 Buachalla, ÓEducation policy, pp 212–13;Google ScholarEarner-Byrne, Lindsey ‘Reinforcing the family: the role of gender, morality and sexuality in Irish welfare policy, 1922—44’ in History of the Family, 13, no. 4 (2008), pp 360–9.Google Scholar

11 Whyte, Church and state, pp 158–61.Google Scholar

12 Report of the Council of Education (1): the function of the primary school; the curriculum to be pursued in the primary school (Dublin, 1954), p. 290.

13 Report of the Council of Education (2): the curriculum of the secondary school (Dublin, 1962), p. 256.

14 Ibid., p. 252.

15 Dáil Éireann deb,, clxxvii, 470 (28 Oct. 1959); Buachalla, ÓEducation policy, p. 73.Google Scholar

16 Walsh, Politics of expansion, p. 323.Google Scholar

17 Buachalla, Séamus Ó ‘Investment in education’ Administration, 44, no. 3 (autumn 1996), pp 10–20.Google Scholar

18 Walsh, John ‘Have the snakes come back? The family and the defence of traditional Catholic educational structures in Ireland’ in History of the Family, 13, no. 4 (2008), pp 416–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

19 Statement by Dr P. J. Hillery T.D., minister for education, in relation to post-primary education, 20 May 1963, pp 6–8 (N.A.I., D/T 17405 C/63).

20 Ibid., pp 11–13.

21 Walsh, JohnPatrick Hillery: the official biography (Dublin, 2008), p. 113.Google Scholar

22 Whyte, Church and state, p. 341.Google Scholar

23 Minutes, general meeting of the hierarchy, 1 Oct. 1962, p. 1 (Dublin Diocesan Archives (D.D.A.), McQuaid Papers, AB8/B/XV/b/05).

24 Hanly to Fergus and McQuaid, 18 Feb. 1963 (ibid).

25 Interview with Hillery, PatrickDublin, 25 Feb. 2002.Google Scholar

26 Minutes, general meeting of the hierarchy, 25 June 1963, p. 3 (D.D.A., McQuaid Papers, AB8/B/XV/b/05).

27 First memorandum by the bishops of Elphin and Achonry on the new post-primary schools scheme, 28 June 1963 (D.D.A., McQuaid Papers, AB8/B/XV/b/05).

28 Proposal for comprehensive post-primary education, 9 Jan. 1963 (N.A.I. D/T 17405 C/63); Hillery to Fergus, Nov. 1963, p.1 (D.D.A., McQuaid Papers, AB8/B/XV/b/05).

29 Minutes, standing committee of the hierarchy, 7 Jan. 1964, p.1 (D.D.A., McQuaid Papers, AB8/B/XV/b/05).

30 Hillery note, May 1964 (U.C.D.A, Hillery Papers, P205, folder 3).

31 Interview with Hillery, PatrickDublin, 17 May 2006.Google Scholar

32 Ibid.

33 Hillery note, ‘attitude of the bishops’, 1964 (U.C.D.A, Hillery Papers, P205, folder 3).

34 Minutes, central executive committee, 3 Jan. 1964; minutes, standing committee, 21 Mar. 1964 (A.S.T.I. papers, A.S.T.I. House, Dublin).

35 Minutes, standing committee, 12 May 1964 (ibid.).

36 Meeting of an rúnaí with members of the standing committee of the Catholic Headmasters’ Association in Marlborough St., 28 Jan. 1965 (Department of Education, Dublin, W26/13, M. 194/4).

37 Draft letter by Hillery to the Catholic bishops, June 1964 (U.C.D.A., Hillery Papers, P205, folder 3).

38 Interview with Hillery, PatrickDublin, 17 May 2006.Google Scholar

39 Ibid.

40 Committee of public accounts, Appropriation accounts 1965–66 (Dublin, 1967), pp 117–18.

41 Dáil Éireann deb., ccxvii, 1960–68 (21 July 1965).

42 Investment in education, Part I, pp 247–52.

43 Irish Press, 13 Sept. 1965.

44 Ibid.

45 Colley to Lemass, 24 Sept. 1965 (N.A.I., D/T 96/6/355, S.12891E).

46 Fergus to Colley, 17 October 1965 (D.D.A., McQuaid Papers, AB8/B/XV/b/05).

47 ‘Mr Colley’s lecture’, Irish Press, 7 Feb.1966.

48 Ibid.

49 ‘School closures unconstitutional, says Dr Browne’, Irish Press, 7 Feb. 1966.

50 Ibid.

51 Ibid.

52 ‘Minister replies to Bishop’s criticisms’, Irish Press, 7 Feb. 1966.

53 ‘No further comment - Dr Browne’, Irish Press, 8 Feb.1966.

54 ‘Minister replies to bishop’s criticisms’, Irish Press, 7 Feb. 1966.

55 Ibid.

56 ‘Clash at Galway’, Irish Independent, 7 Feb. 1966.

57 Dáil Éireann deb., ccxx, 1729–31 (16 Feb. 1966).

58 Ibid., 1749.

59 Ibid., 1780–8.

60 Lemass to Colley, 25 Sept.1965 (N.A.I., D/T 96/6/355, S.12891E).

61 Tomás Ó Floinn, Recent developments in education in Ireland, June 1972 (N.A.I., DFA 2003/17/383); Coolahan, John ‘Educational policy for national schools 1960–85’, in Mulcahy, D.G. and O’Sullivan, Denis (eds), Irish educational policy (Dublin, 1989), p. 42.Google Scholar

62 Report of central executive committee 1971–72 (INTO, 1972), p. 36; Coolahan, ‘National schools 1960–85’ in Mulcahy, and O’Sullivan, (eds), Irish educational policy, p. 42.Google Scholar

63 Whyte, Church and state, p. 340.Google Scholar

64 ‘State plans free education for all children’, Irish Times, 12 Sept. 1966.

65 Lemass to O’Malley, 12 Sep. 1966 (N.A.I., D/T 96/6/356, S.12891F); interview with Dálaigh, Tony ÓDublin, 3 May 2002.Google Scholar

66 O’Connor, SeánA troubled sky: reflections on the Irish educational scene (Dublin, 1986), p. 144.Google Scholar O’Connor was assistant secretary (later secretary) of the Department of Education.

67 Minutes of the Irish hierarchy, meeting of the minister for education with the hierarchy at Maynooth, 3 Oct. 1966, p. 1 (D.D.A., McQuaid Papers, AB8/B/XV/b/05).

68 Ibid.

69 Ibid., p. 2.

70 Fergus to Ó Raifeartaigh, 14 Dec. 1966 (N.A.I., D/T 98/6/144, S.12891F).

71 Fr. Hughes’s proposed questions for minister, Dec.1966 (Irish Christian Brothers Archive, Dún Laoghaire (I.C.B.A.), St Helen’s province, A4 R2.06).

72 Minute book, central executive committee, 9 Mar. 1967, p. 257 (Central Secretariat of Secondary Schools, Dundrum).

73 Doyle, EileenLeading the way: managing voluntary secondary schools (Dublin, 2000), p. 129.Google Scholar

74 T. G. Moynihan to Lynch and O’Malley, 6 Dec. 1966 (I.C.B.A., St. Helen’s Province, A4 R2.10).

75 The orders who issued this appeal ere the Christian, Presentation, De La Salle, Patrician and Marist Brothers. Memorandum presented to an taoiseach and an t-aire oideachais on points arising from the proposed scheme for free post-primary education as presented to Dáil Éireann on 30 Nov. 1966, 6 Dec. 1966 (ibid., A4 R2.11).

76 Moynihan to Lynch, 6 Dec. 1966 (ibid., A4 R2.10); Doyle, Leading the way, p. 130.Google Scholar

77 Note of meeting with minister, 9 Dec. 1966 (I.C.B.A., St Helen’s Province, A4 R2.07).

78 Ibid.

79 Memorandum to the government, provision of a grant in lieu of school fees to secondary schools opting for the minister’s scheme, 26 Jan.1967 (N.A.I., D/T 98/6/144, S.12891F); Cabinet minutes, pp 2–3, 31 Jan.1967 (N.A.I., 99/5/1, G.C.12/15).

80 Fergus to Ó Raifeartaigh, 2 Feb. 1967 (N.A.I., D/T 98/6/144, S.12891F).

81 The minister’s scheme for free education, p. 5 (N.A.I., D/T 98/6/144, S.12891F).

82 Hughes to O’Malley, 27 Jan. 1967 (ibid.).

83 Ibid.

84 Summary of points made by the minister to the joint managerial committee, 31 Jan. 1967 (D.D.A., McQuaid Papers, AB8/B/XV/b/05).

85 Ibid.

86 Memorandum by the Catholic managerial committee to the hierarchy, 12 Feb. 1967 (D.D.A., McQuaid Papers, AB8/B/XV/b/05).

87 Hughes to McQuaid, 2 Feb. 1967 (ibid.).

88 McQuaid to Hughes, 3 Feb. 1967 (ibid.).

89 McQuaid to Fergus, 21 Feb. 1967 (ibid.).

90 Ibid.

91 McQuaid to Ó Raifeartaigh, 27 Jan. 1967 (N.A.I., D/T 98/6/144, S.12891F).

92 Meetings of Fr Hughes and Mother Jordana with the Christian Brothers’ major superiors and the major superiors of the other Brothers' institutes, 26 Jan.1967 (D.D.A., McQuaid Papers, AB8/B/XV/b/05).

93 McQuaid to O’Malley, 2 Feb. 1967 (ibid.).

94 O’Malley to McQuaid, 7 Feb. 1967; McQuaid to O’Malley, 8 Feb. 1967 (ibid.).

95 The minister’s scheme for free education, Feb. 1967, p. 7 (N.A.I., D/T 98/6/144, S.12891F).

96 Seanad Éireann deb., lxii, 1074–1111, (9 Feb. 1967).

97 Ibid., 1087.

98 Ibid., 1090.

99 O’Connor, A troubled sky, p. 155.Google Scholar

100 Randles, EileenPost-primary education in Ireland 1957–70 (Dublin, 1975), p. 261;Google ScholarO’Dea, Thomas ‘Editorial’, The Secondary Teacher, 2, no.5, (1967), p. 5.Google Scholar

101 McQuaid to O’Malley, 11 Feb. 1967 (D.D.A., McQuaid Papers, AB8/B/XV/b/05).

102 T. Ó Raifeartaigh, Note of discussion between the minister, Mr Donogh O’Malley, and His Eminence Cardinal Conway at Dundalk on 15 Feb. 1967, p. 1 (N.A.I., D/T 98/6/144, S.12891F).

103 Memorandum to the government, 27 June 1967 (N.A.I, D/T 98/6/95).

104 T. Ó Raifeartaigh, note of discussion between O’Malley and Conway, p. 1 (N.A.I., D/T 98/6/144, S.12891F).

105 Ibid., pp.1–2.

106 Memorandum from the Catholic managerial committee to the episcopal commission for post-primary education, 12 Feb. 1967, pp.1–2 (D.D.A., McQuaid Papers, AB8/B/XV/b/05).

107 Ibid., p. 2.

108 Hughes to McQuaid, 17 Feb. 1967 (ibid.).

109 The O’Malley scheme, note for the information of the bishops, Feb. 1967 (ibid.).

110 Hughes to the clerical major superiors, 17 Feb. 1967 (ibid.); Doyle, Leading the way, p. 133.Google Scholar

111 Hughes to O’Malley, 24 Feb. 1967 (D.D.A., McQuaid Papers, AB8/B/XV/b/05).

112 Hughes to the clerical major superiors, 17 Feb. 1967 (ibid.).

113 Randles, Post-primary education, p. 276;Google Scholar Committee of Public Accounts, Appropriation accounts 1967–68 (Dublin, 1969), p. 118.

114 Fergus to McQuaid, 20 Feb.1967 (D.D.A., McQuaid Papers, AB8/B/XV/b/05).