Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T15:25:14.391Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Recovery from mental illness: changing the focus of mental health services

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2014

Abiola Oshodi
Affiliation:
St Patrick's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland
Gavin Rush
Affiliation:
St Patrick's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland

Abstract

The concept of recovery entered the lexicon of the mental health services in the 1980s following the publication of a series of studies and personal narratives which demonstrated that the course of mental illness was not always one of inevitable deterioration and that people diagnosed with severe mental illness could reclaim or recover meaningful lives. For a long time, recovery was not thought possible by many family members, service providers and researchers. However globally, specific policy and clinical strategies are being developed to implement recovery principles although key questions remain. In fact, the possibility of recovery is still debated by some. In this paper, we include information about the recovery model and the medical model; we provide evidence for recovery and document changes in mental health practices and policies incorporating recovery as the guiding principle. We also attempt to address the debate as to whether recovery is an evidence based practice. We propose that evidence based practice should be complementary to value-based and narrative-based practices and we suggest an integrative model that maximises the virtues and minimises the weaknesses of each practices (see Figure 1).

Type
Perspective
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Jacobson, N, Curtis, L. Recovery as a policy in mental health services: Strategies emerging from the states. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 2000; 23(4): 333341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Deegan, P. Recovery as a Journey of the Heart. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 1996; 19(3): 9197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Anthony, WA. Recovery from mental illness: The guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal 1993; 16: 1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Mental Health Act Commission. Te Tahuhu - improving Mental Health 2005–2015. The second New Zealand Mental Health and Addiction Plan. Mental Health Act Commission, 2005.Google Scholar
5.The American Association of Community Psychiatrists guidelines for Recovery Oriented Services, 2005; 41(6): 757774.Google Scholar
6.Mental Health Commission. A Recovery Approach within the Irish mental health services: A framework for development p. 12, 2008.Google Scholar
7.Fisher, D. Empowerment Model of Recovery from Severe Mental Illness: An Expert interview with Daniel B. Fisher, Medscape Psychiatry & Mental Health 2005; 10(1).Google Scholar
8.Bellack, AS. Scientific and consumer models of recovery in schizophrenia: concordance, contrasts, and implications. Schizophrenia Bulletin 2006; (July), 32(3): 432-42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Secker, J, Membrey, H, Grove, Bet al.Recovering from illness or recovering your life? Implications of Clinical versus Social Models of Recovery from Mental Health Problems for Employment Support Services, Disability & Society June 2002; 17(4): 403418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Peyser, H. What is recovery? A commentary. Psychiatric Services 2001; 52: 486487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Munetz, MR, Frese, FJ. Getting ready for recovery: reconciling mandatory treatment with the recovery vision. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 2001; 25(1): 3542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Goldstein, J. Recovery and Wellness: Models of Hope and Empowerment for People With Mental Illness, 2001. (Ed. Brown, C), Binghamton, Haworth Press, New York.Google Scholar
13.Frese, et al.Integrating Evidence Based Practices and the Recovery Model Psychiatric Service 2001; 52: 14621468.Google Scholar
14.DeSisto, MJ, Harding, CM, McCormick, RVet al. The Maine and Vermont three-decade studies of serious mental illness. British Journal of Psychiatry 1995; 167: 331341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Harding, CM, Brooks, GW, Asolaga, TSet al.The Vermont longitudinal study of persons with severe mental illness. American Journal of Psychiatry 1987; 144: 718726.Google ScholarPubMed
16.Greenhalgh, T, Hurwitz, B. Why study narrative. In Narrative Based Medicine, BMJ Books: London, 1998.Google Scholar
17.Hunter, KM. Doctor's stories: The Narrative Structure of Medical Knowledge, Princeton University Press: Princeton, CA, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Fulford, KWM. Moral Theory and Medical Practice, 1989. Cambridge University Press, UK.Google Scholar
19.Woodbridge, K, Fulford, KWM. Whose Values? A Workbook for Values-Based Practice in Mental Health Care. Psychiatric Bulletin 2005; 29: 318Google Scholar
20.Fulford, KWM, King, M. A values-based perspective on good practice in compulsion. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment 2008; 14: 183184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Jones, TB. Promoting Active Learning: Strategies for the College Classroom, Jossey-Bass Inc, California, 1993.Google Scholar
22.A Vision for Change: Report of the Expert Group on Mental Health Policy 2006, Government publications office, Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar
23.Copeland, ME. Overview of WRAP: Wellness Recovery Action Plan, Mental Health Recovery Newsletter 2002; 3(2): 19.Google Scholar
24. President's New Freedom Commission on Mental Health 2003. Achieving the Promise: Transforming Mental Health Care in America.Google Scholar
25.Sharfstein, S. Recovery Model will strengthen Psychiatrist-Patient Relationship American Psychiatric Association, Psychiatric News 2005; 40: 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors and the National Technical Assistance Centre for State Mental Health Planning 2004. Implementing Recovery-based Care: Tangible Guidance for SMHAs.Google Scholar
27.Jacobson, N, Greenley, D. What is recovery? A conceptual model and explication Psychiatric Services 2001; 52: 482485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28. Canadian Mental Health Association, Ontario 2003. Recovery rediscovered: Implications for the Ontario mental health system.Google Scholar
29.Mental Health Commission, 2002. Recovery Competencies for New Zealand Mental Health Workers.Google Scholar
30. Australian Government National Mental Health Plan 20032008.Google Scholar
31.National Institute mental health in England, 2005. Guiding Statement on Recovery.Google Scholar
32.Ramon, S, Healy, B, Renouf, N. Recovery from mental illness as an emergent concept and practice in Australia and the UK. International Journal of Social Psychiatry 2007; 53(2): 108122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33. Scottish Executive. Rights, Relationships and Recovery: The Report of the National Review of Mental Health Nursing in Scotland, 2006.Google Scholar
34.Ridgway, P. Assessing the recovery commitment of your mental health service, Allan Press, 2004.Google Scholar
35.Andreasen, R, Caputi, P, Oades, L. Stages of recovery instrument: development of a measure of recovery from serious mental illness. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2006; 40(11-12): 972–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36.Campbell-Orde, T, Chamberlin, J, Carpenter, Jet al.Measuring the Promise: A Compendium of Recovery Measures, 2005; Volume 11.Google Scholar