No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Mental health rehabilitation services in Ireland: vision and reality
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 June 2014
Abstract
Objectives: The Irish national mental health policy document, A Vision for Change, included recommendations to develop specialist rehabilitation mental health services. This survey was conducted as part of a multicentre study to investigate current provision of mental health rehabilitation services in Ireland and factors associated with better clinical outcomes for users of these services. The aim was to carry out a detailed national survey of specialist rehabilitation services in order to describe current service provision.
Method: A structured questionnaire was sent to consultant rehabilitation psychiatrists in all mental health catchment areas of Ireland that had any rehabilitation services to gather data on various aspects of service provision.
Results: Twenty-six of the 31 mental health areas of Ireland had some form of rehabilitation service. Sixteen teams working in 15 of these areas fulfilled A Vision for Change criteria to be defined as specialist rehabilitation services and all 16 responded to the survey. The overall response rate was 73% (19/26). Most services lacked a full multidisciplinary team. Only one service had an assertive outreach team with acceptable fidelity to the assertive outreach model. Urban services were less well resourced than rural services.
Conclusion: This is the first national survey to describe the provision of mental health rehabilitation services in Ireland. Although there has been an increase in the provision of consultant-led specialist rehabilitation services nationally, these services lack multidisciplinary input. There also appears to be a lack of planned provision of the facilities required to provide comprehensive rehabilitation services with unequal distribution of resources between urban and rural areas. This has potential cost implications for local mental health services in relation to ‘out of area treatment’ placements and perhaps more importantly to the overall quality of patient care.
- Type
- Original Papers
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011
References
1.A Vision for Change. Dublin: Report of the Expert Group on Mental Health Policy, 2006.Google Scholar
2.Department of Health. Planning for the Future. Report of a Study Group on the Development of the Psychiatric Service. Dublin, Ireland: Department of Health, 1984.Google Scholar
3.OP64. How to set up rehabilitation and recovery services in Ireland. Occasional paper by The Irish College of Psychiatrists, 2007.Google Scholar
4.Mental Health Commission Annual report including the report of the inspector of mental health services. Dublin, Ireland: Mental Health Commission, 2007: 81, 82, 85.Google Scholar
5.Tedstone, D, Walsh, D, Moran, R.Mental Health Commission. Happy Living Here…A Survey and Evaluation of Community Residential Mental Health Services in Ireland. Ireland: Health Research Board, 2007: 129 10.9.Google Scholar
6.Teague, GB, Bond, GR, Drake, RE. Program fidelity in assertive community treatment: development and use of a measure. Am J Orthopsychiatry 1998; 68: 216–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Walsh, D, Moran, R. Psychiatric Day Care – An underused option? The purposes and functions of psychiatric day hospitals and day centres: A study in two health boards. 2003.Google Scholar
8.Norusis, M.SPSS for Windows version 12.0.1 (11 November 2003). Chicago: SPSS Inc. 2004.Google Scholar
9.Killaspy, H, Harden, C, Holloway, F, King, M.What do mental health rehabilitation services do and what are they for? A national survey in England. J Mental Health. 2005: 14; 157–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.O'Grady, J.The complimentary role of regional and local secure provision for psychiatric patients. Health Trends 1990; 22: 14–16.Google Scholar
11.Bacik, I, Kelly, A, O'Connell, M, Sinclair, H.Crime and Poverty in Dublin: an analysis of the association between community deprivation, District Court appearance and sentence severity. Dublin: Round Hall Press, 2000.Google Scholar
12 O'Neill, C, Sinclair, H, Kelly, A, Kennedy, HG. Interaction of forensic and general psychiatric services in Ireland: learning the lessons or repeating the mistakes? Ir J Psych Med 2002; 19(2): 48–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Mental Health Commission. Annual report including the report of the inspector of mental health services. Ireland: Mental Health Commission, 2004: 113–115, 134.Google Scholar
14.Mental Health Commission. Annual report including the report of the inspector of mental health services. Ireland: Mental Health Commission, 2005: 5, 56–60, 62.Google Scholar
15.Mental Health Commission. Annual report including the report of the inspector of mental health services. Ireland: Mental Health Commission, 2006: 82, 84, 86.Google Scholar
16.Mental Health Commission. Annual report including the report of the inspector of mental health services. Ireland: Mental Health Commission, 2007: 81, 82, 85.Google Scholar
17.Keogh, F, Roche, A, Walsh, D. “We have no beds…”. An enquiry in to the availability and use of acute psychiatric beds in eastern health board. Ireland: Health Research Board, 1999.Google Scholar
18.O'Keane, V, Walsh, D, Barry, S.The Black Hole. The Irish Psychiatric Association Report on the funding allocation to the adult mental health services: where is it actually going. Ireland: Irish Psychiatric Association, 2003.Google Scholar
20.Kelly, BD, O'Callaghan, E, Waddington, JL, et al. Schizophrenia and the city: A review of literature and prospective study of psychosis and urbanicity in Ireland. Schiz Res 2010; 116: 75–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Krabbendam, L, van Os, J.Schizophrenia and urbanicity: a major environmental influence – conditional on genetic risk. Schiz Bull 2005; 31: 795–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Marcelis, M, Takei, N, van Os, J.Urbanisation and risk for schizophrenia: does the effect operate before or around the time of illness onset? Psychol Med 1999; 29: 1197–1203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed