Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-05T05:20:11.854Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Forty Years after 1967: Reappraising the Role and Limits of the Legal Discourse on Occupation in the Israeli-Palestinian Context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 March 2012

Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Introduction
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and The Faculty of Law, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Convention Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land (Hague, IV), Oct. 18, 1907, 36 Stat. 2277, 2306, 205 Consol. T.S. 277, 295 [hereinafter Hague Regulations].

2 Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War. Aug. 12, 1949, 6 U.S.T. 3516, 75 U.N.T.S. 287.

3 For the seminal book on this topic, see Kretzmer, David, The Occupation of Justice: The Supreme Court of Israel and the Occupied Territories (2002)Google Scholar.

4 HCJ 2056/04 Beit Sourik Village Council v. The Government of Israel [2004] IsrSC 58(5) 807, at ¶ 42. An English translation is available in H.C.J. 2056/04 Beit Sourik Village v. Government of Israel 58(5) PD. 807,38 Isr. L. Rev. 83 (2005) and also on the Israel Supreme Court website, http://elyon1.court.gov.il/files_eng/04/560/020/A28/04020560.a28.htm (last visited May 18, 2008).

5 HCJ 769/02 The Public Committee Against Torture in Israel v. The Government of Israel [Dec. 13, 2006] (unpublished).