Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:40:30.026Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

FEDERALISMO E MOVIMENTI SOCIALI

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2018

Marco G. Giugni

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

L'idea di un'Italia federale è entrata nel dibattito pubblico nel corso degli ultimi anni. Una delle cause principali di questa avanzata è certamente l'ascesa della Lega, che del federalismo ha fatto il suo credo fondamentale. Recentemente, l'idea di trasformare l'Italia da paese centralizzato e unitario (non dimentichiamo comunque il relativo decentramento avvenuto a partire dagli anni settanta attraverso il rafforzamento delle regioni) a stato federale si è fatta strada in seno a molti partiti, tanto che nessuna forza politica sembra oggi opporsi in modo deciso a tale progetto di decentralizzazione territoriale e amministrativa del paese.

Federalism can be conceived as part of the political opportunity structure affecting social movements. According to the political process model, a decentralized institutional structure provides favourable opportunities for movement mobilization, whereas a centralized structure offers less room for political protest. This article explores this general hypothesis with the help of quantitative data on protest events carried out by new social movements in two federal countries (Switzerland and Germany) and in two unitarian countries (France and the Netherlands), as well as qualitative data on these countries and on the United States. Results show that a federal institutional structure has several consequences on social movements. First, movements in federal states tend to address their claims on different levels, while in unitarian states they focus on a national level. Furthermore, the movements' organizational structure reflects the decentralization of the country. Second, federalism, when combined with prevailing inclusive strategies of the political authorities, contributes to moderate the movements' action repertoires. Finally, movements in federal states can quite easily obtain reactive effects. They find more difficult to provoke proactive effects, however, due to the weakness of the state. They may provoke both types of effects in unitarian states when the authorities share the movements' goals. These results have relevant implications for Italy, which seems to be tending toward federalism.

Type
Note
Information
Italian Political Science Review / Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , April 1996 , pp. 147 - 170
Copyright
Copyright © Societ Italiana di Scienza Politica 

References

Riferimenti bibliografici

Amenta, E., Carruthers, B.G. e Zylan, Y. (1992), A Hero for the Aged? The Townsend Movement, the Political Mediation Model, and U.S. Old-Age Policy, 1934–1950, in <American Journal of Sociology>, 98, pp. 308–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedford, H.F. (1990), Seabrook Station. Citizen Politics and Nuclear Power, Amherst, MA, Massachusetts University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, J.L. (1988), Collapse of an Industry. Nuclear Power and the Contradictions of U.S. Policy, Ithaca, NY and London, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Delia Porta, D. (1990), Il terrorismo di sinistra, Bologna, Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Delia Porta, D. (1995), Social Movements, Political Violence and the State, New York and Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisinger, P.K. (1973), The Conditions of Protest Behavior in American Cities, in <American Political Science Review>, 67, pp. 11–28.Google Scholar
Giugni, M.G. (1995), Entre strategic et opportunité. Les nouveaux mouvements sociaux en Suisse, Zurigo, Seismo.Google Scholar
Jasper, J.M. (1990), Nuclear Politics. Energy and the State in the United States, Sweden and France, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H. (1986), Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies, in <British Journal of Political Science>, 16, pp. 57–85.Google Scholar
Koopmans, R. (1992), Democracy from Below. New Social Movements and the Political System in West Germany, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Kriesi, H. (1991), The Political Opportunity Structure of New Social Movements: Its Impact on Their Mobilization, FS III 91–103, Berlino Wissenschaftszentrum.Google Scholar
Kriesi, H., Koopmans, R., Duyvendak, J.W. e Giugni, M.G. (1992), New Social Movements and Political Opportunities in Western Europe, in <European Journal of Political Research>, 22, pp. 219–244.Google Scholar
Kriesi, H. (1995), New Social Movements in Western Europe. A Comparative Analysis, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1984), Democracies. Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries, New Haven, CT and London, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mazmanian, D. e Morell, D. (1992), Beyond Superfailure. America's Toxics Policy for the 1990s, Boulder, CO, Westview Press.Google Scholar
McAdam, D. (1982), Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970, Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, P.E. (a cura di) (1994), The President, the Congress, and the Making of Foreign Policy, Norman, OK and London, Oklahoma University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, R.D. (1993), Making Democracy Work. Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press., trad. it. La tradizione civica nelle regioni italiane, Milano, Mondadori, 1993.Google Scholar
Riker, W.H. (1975), Federalism, in Handbook of Political Science, Vol. 5: Governmental Institutions and Processes, a cura di Greenstein, F.I. e Polsby, N.W., Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Rüdig, W. (1990), Anti-Nuclear Movements. A World Survey of Opposition to Nuclear Energy, Harlow, Essex, Longman.Google Scholar
Shull, S.A. (a cura di) (1991), The Two Presidencies: A Quarter Century Assessment, Chicago, IL, Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
Tarrow, S. (1974), Local Constraints on Regional Reform: a Comparison of Italy and France, in <Comparative Politics>, 7, pp. 1–36.Google Scholar
Tarrow, S. (1989), Struggle, Politics, and Reform: Collective Action, Social Movements, and Cycles of Protest, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University, Western Societies Program Occasional Paper Nr. 21.Google Scholar
Tarrow, S. (1994), Power in Movement. Social Movements, Collective Action and Mass Politics, New York and Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. (1978), From Mobilization to Revolution, Reading, Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. (1984), Social Movements and National Politics, in Statemaking and Social Movements. Essays in History and Theory, a cura di C. Bright e S. Harding, Ann Arbor, MI, University of Michigan Press, pp. 297–317.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, A. (1966), The Two Presidencies, in <Transaction>, 4, pp. 7–14.Google Scholar