Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T02:50:05.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Towards a Global Anthropology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2010

Kasja Ekholm
Affiliation:
Lund
Jonathan Friedman
Affiliation:
Copenhagen

Extract

The development of a global perspective in anthropology is a very different kind of phenomenon from that in economics or economic history. In the latter disciplines, the field of enquiry may easily be extended to the entire world, or at least to large enough portions of it that systemic supra-society relations are clearly discernable. The periodic appearance of an intellectual orientation to global relations – from the mercantilistists to the dependency theorists – is clear evidence of the availability of the larger perspective. The more common focus on the nation state or, by abstraction, the “society”, as the locus of analysis and explanation has been a reflex of the emergence of national cycles of economic reproduction in the nineteenth century. Ricardo, Marx, Keynes and much modern development theory restrict the field of enquiry to the single society where all the necessary conditions of reproduction and thus, explanation, are thought to be located (Friedman 1976, 1978). Finally, with the emergence after World War Two of a center/periphery model of imperialism, a global perspective has again gained prominence.

Type
General
Copyright
Copyright © Research Institute for History, Leiden University 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Busch, K.Die Multinationalen Konzerne, Frankfurt. 1974Google Scholar
Clastres, P. “Eléments de demographie indienne”, L'Homme 13 1973Google Scholar
, ClastersLa société contre I'état, Paris 1974Google Scholar
Diakonoff, I. M.Slaves, helots and serfs in Early AntiquitySoviet Anthropology and Archeology 15, 1977 2–3.Google Scholar
Ekholm, K.Power and Prestige: the Rise and Fall of the Kongo Kingdom, Uppsala. 1972Google Scholar
Ekholm, k. 1976Om studiet av det globala systemets dynamik”, Antropologiska studier, 20Google Scholar
Ekholm, k. 1977a Om studiet av riskgenerering i samhället och av hur risker kan avvärjas, samarbetskommittén for langsiktsmotiverad forskning, Report 11, Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Ekhiom, k. 1977b “External Exchange and the Transformation of Central African Social Systems”. In: Friedman, J. & Rowlands, M. (eds.), The Evolution of Social Systems, London.Google Scholar
Ekholm, k. 1979Arkeologi som samhallsvetenskap”, Kontakt (Inter-Scandinavian Journal of Archeology).Google Scholar
Ekholm, K. and Friedman, J. 1979 “‘Capital’ imperialism and exploitation in Ancient World Systems’ in , Larsen (ed.), Power and Propaganda: A symposium on ancient empires, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Frankenstein, S. and Rowlands, M.J. 1977The Evolution of Political Structures in the European Iron Age1978 (in press)Google Scholar
Friedberg, C. 1977 “The Development of Traditional Agricultural Practices in Western Timor: From the RitualControl of Consumer Goods to the Political Control of Prestige Goods” in Friedman, J. & Rowlands, M.J. (eds.), The Evolution of Social Systems, London.Google Scholar
Friedman, J. 1976Marxist Theory and Systems of Total Reproduction”, Critique of Anthropology, 7.Google Scholar
Friedman, J. 1978Crises in Theory and Transformations of the World Economy”, Review II, 2.Google Scholar
Friedman, J. 1979 System, Structure and Contradictions in the Evolution of ‘Asiatic’ Social Formations, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Friedman, J. & Rowlands, M. J. “Notes toward an Epigenetic Model of the Evolution of Civilisation”. 1977 In: Friedman, J. and Rowlands, M. J. (eds.), The Evolution of Social Systems, London.Google Scholar
Frobel, F., Heinrichs, J. & , Kreye, 1977 ODie neue Internationale Arbeitsteilung, HamburgGoogle Scholar
Fuks, A. 1974Patterns and Types of Social-economic Revolution in Greece from the Fourth to the Second 1974 Century B.C.”, Ancient Society, 5.Google Scholar
Godelier, M. 1973 Horizon, Trajects marxistes en anthropologie, Paris.Google Scholar
Hedeager, L. 1979 “A Quantitative Analysis of Roman Imports in Europe North of the Limes (1-400 A.D.), and the Question of Roman-Germanic Exchange”. In: , Kristiansen and , Paludan-Muller (eds.), New Directions in Scandinavian Archeology, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Hamberg-Karlovsky, C. 1975 “Third Millenium Modes of Exchange and Modes of Production”. In: Sabloff, J. and Lamberg-Karlovsky, C. (eds.), Ancient Civilization and Trade, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Lathrap, D. 1968 “The Hunting Economies of the Tropical Forest Zone of South America”, in: Lee, R. and Devore, I. (eds.), Man the Hunter, Chicago.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C. 1967 Les structures ilementaires de la parenté, Paris.Google Scholar
, Lévi-strauss 1973 Anthropologie structural (Vol. II), Paris.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, A. 1948 “The Supposed Primitivism in Rousseau's Discourse on Inequality”. In: Essays in the History of Ideas, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, A. and Boas, G. 1935 Primitivism and Related Ideas in Antiquity, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
Nash, D.Foreign Trade and the Development of the State in Pre-Roman Gaulm.s. n.d.Google Scholar
Rey, P. P. 1972 Colonialisme, néo-colonialisme et transition au capitalisme, Paris.Google Scholar
Schneider, J. & P. 1976 Culture and Political Economy in Western Sicily, New York.Google Scholar
Schoeller, W. 1976 Weltmarkt und Reproduktion des Kapitals, EWA.Google Scholar
Stavrianos, L. S. 1976 The Promise of the Coming Dark Age, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Steward, J. (ed.) 1963 Handbook of South American Indians, V, New York.Google Scholar
Turnbull, C. 1966 Wayward Servants, London.Google Scholar
Vicedom, G. F. & Tischner, H. 19431948 Die Mbowamb, Hamburg.Google Scholar