Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T16:55:04.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trading in Vain? Investigating the Philippines' Development-oriented National Security and Free Trade Linkages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2016

MICHAEL I. MAGCAMIT
MICHAEL I. MAGCAMIT*
Affiliation:
University of Canterbury, New Zealandmim49@uclive.ac.nz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines the manner through which the Philippine government has utilized free trade in pursuing its development-oriented national security policies and strategies in the twenty-first century. It argues that against the backdrop of uneven economic development being perpetuated by a deeply entrenched oligarchic system and patronage culture, the primary referent of Philippine national security is its diminishing development space. Despite the government rhetoric with regard to the role of inclusive development in enhancing national security, the Philippine political economy remains highly oligarchic and patrimonial. Such a condition has resulted in institutionalized inequality and structural poverty that undermine the country's supposedly development-based security model. The ability of the very few yet very powerful Filipino elites to transform the country into an oligarchipelago underscores the inefficiencies emanating from this type of politico-economic arrangement. In light of this, the paper evaluates the impacts of the Philippines' free trade activities on its overall level of development space by focusing on several crucial aspects of free trade that the government has failed to properly consider. Moreover, it scrutinizes the key factors that affect the utility of free trade for securing and enhancing the Philippines' development space. The paper concludes by arguing that the Philippine government's attempts at linking its development-centric security interests and free trade objectives have resulted not only in the preservation of uneven economic development and but also the further reinforcement of the existing oligarchic system and patronage culture in the country.

Type
Research Article
Information
Japanese Journal of Political Science , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 84 - 105
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abad, A., Gonzales, K., Rosellon, M., and Yap, T. (2012), ‘Unfair Trade Practices in the Philippines’, PIDS Discussion Paper No. 2012–39.Google Scholar
Aldaba, R. (2012), ‘Surviving Trade Liberalization in Philippines Manufacturing’, PIDS Discussion Paper No. 2012-10.Google Scholar
Aldaba, R. (2013), ‘Twenty Years after Philippine Trade Liberalization and Industrialization: What Has Happened and Where Do We Go from Here’, PIDS Discussion Paper No. 2013-21.Google Scholar
Altman, R. (2009), ‘Globalization in Retreat’, Foreign Affairs, 88 (4): 2‒7.Google Scholar
Anderson, B. (1998), ‘Cacique Democracy and the Philippines’, New Left Review, 169 (1): 3‒33.Google Scholar
Asian Development Bank (ADB) (2007), Philippines: Critical Development Constraints, Manila: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
Asian Development Bank (ADB) (2009), Poverty in the Philippines: Causes, Constraints and Opportunities, Manila: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
Association of Southeast Asian Nations (2014), ‘ASEAN Economic Community’, http://www.asean.org/communities/asean-economic-community (accessed 17 January 2014).Google Scholar
Association of Southeast Asian Nations (2014), ‘ASEAN Free Trade Area’, http://www.asean.org/communities/asean-economic-community/category/asean-free-trade-area-afta-council (accessed 3 July 2014).Google Scholar
Association of Southeast Asian Nations (2014), ‘Free Trade Agreements with Dialogue Partners’, http://www.asean.org/communities/asean-economic-community/category/free-trade-agreements-with-dialogue-partners (accessed 1 October 2014).Google Scholar
Atienza, M., Berja, C., Cabilo, Z., and Baviera, M. (2010), Developing a Human Security Index for the Philippines: An Exploratory Study in Selected Conflict Areas, Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press.Google Scholar
Bautista, R. (1989), Impediments to Trade Liberalization in the Philippines, London: Trade Policy Research Center.Google Scholar
Bello, W. (2005), Deglobalisation: Ideas for a New World Economy, London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Bello, W. (ed.) (2004), The Anti-Development State: The Political Economy of Permanent Crisis in the Philippines, Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press.Google Scholar
Bello, W. (2010), ‘The Conditional Cash Transfer debate and the coalition against the poor’, Focus on Global South, 1 January. http://focusweb.org/content/conditional-cash-transfer-debate-and-coalition-against-poor#sthash.pX3WefaM.dpuf (accessed 2 October 2014).Google Scholar
Buzan, B., Wæver, O., and de Wilde, J. (1998), Security: A New Framework for Analysis, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Centre Europe-Tiers Monde (2000), ‘WTO and the Agrarian Reform in the Philippines’, http://www.cetim.ch/en/interventions/142/l-omc-et-la-reforme-agraire-aux-philippines (accessed 6 October 2014).Google Scholar
Clarete, R. (1995), ‘How Valuable is MFN Treatment to the Philippines?’, Philippine Review of Economics and Business, 32 (2): 171–194.Google Scholar
Clarete, R. (1999), ‘Trade-related Problems and Policy Issues in Philippine Agriculture’, Philippine Review of Economics and Business, 36 (1), 127–158.Google Scholar
Clarete, R. (2005), ‘Ex-post Effects of Trade Liberalization in the Philippines’, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, 18 January, http://www.unctad.info/upload/TAB/docs/TechCooperation/philippines_study.pdf (accessed 2 October 2014).Google Scholar
Comia, A. (2010), ‘Band Aid Solution Conditional Cash Transfers in the Philippines’, IBON EDM, 1 September, http://iboninternational.org/resources/pages/EDM/82/149 (accessed 6 October 2014).Google Scholar
Cororaton, C. (2000), ‘Philippine Tariff Reforms: A CGE Analysis’, PIDS Discussion Paper No. 2000–35.Google Scholar
Cororaton, C. (2004), ‘Analyzing the Impact of Trade Reforms on Welfare and Income Distribution Using CGE Framework: the Case of the Philippines’, Philippine Journal of Development, 31 (1): 25–64.Google Scholar
Cororaton, C. (2008), ‘The Impact of Trade Reform in the 1990s on Welfare and Poverty in the Philippines’, in Cockburn, J., Decaluwe, B., and Robichaud, V. (eds.), Trade Liberalization and Poverty: A CGE Analysis of the 1990s Experience in Africa and Asia, Nairobi: PEP Research Network, pp. 345–74.Google Scholar
Cororaton, C., Cockburn, J., and Corong, E. (2006), ‘Doha Scenarios, Trade Reforms, and Poverty in the Philippines: A CGE Analysis’, MTID Discussion Paper No. 86.Google Scholar
David, C., Intal, P., and Balisacan, A. (2007), ‘Distortions to Agricultural Incentives in the Philippines’, Agricultural Distortions Working Paper No. 28.Google Scholar
De Dios, E. and Hutchcroft, P. (2003), ‘Political Economy’, in Balisacan, A. and Hill, H. (eds.), The Philippine Economy, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 45–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, K. (2003), ‘Restoration or Transformation? Trapos versus NGOs in the Democratization of the Philippines’, Journal of Asian Studies, 62 (2): 469–96.Google Scholar
Ezeani, E. (2013), ‘WTO post Doha: Trade Deadlocks and Protectionism’, Journal of International Trade Law and Policy, 12 (3): 272–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Focus on Global South (2003), ‘The Philippines under the WTO: An Unmitigated Disaster’, http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=7268 (accessed 2 October 2014).Google Scholar
Grossholtz, J. (1964), Politics in the Philippines, Boston, MA: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Habito, C. and Cororaton, C. (2000), WTO and the Philippine Economy: An Empirical and Analytical Assessment of Post-WTO Trade Reforms in the Philippines, Manila: AGILE Program.Google Scholar
Hartman, S. (2013), ‘The WTO, the Doha Round Impasse, PTAs, and FTAs/RTAs’, The International Trade Journal, 27 (5): 411–430.Google Scholar
Hodder, R. (2014), ‘Merit versus Kinship: A Category Mistake? The Case of Philippine Civil Service’, Public Administration and Development, 34 (5): 370–88.Google Scholar
Hutchcroft, P. (1998), Booty Capitalism: The Politics of Banking in the Philippines, Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.Google Scholar
Hutchcroft, P. (2008), ‘The Arroyo Imbroglio in the Philippines’, Journal of Democracy, 19 (1): 141–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IBON Foundation (2011), ‘Philippine Development Plan 2011–2016: A Social Contract with Whom?’, http://ibon.org/ibon_articles.php?id=153 (accessed 2 October 2014).Google Scholar
IBON Foundations (2013), ‘Philippine Loses from Mew WTO Deal: Gov't Should Have Rejected Bali Package’, IBON News, 7 December, http://ibon.org/ibon_articles.php?id=353 (accessed 3 October 2014).Google Scholar
International Labour Organization (2014), ‘Economic Security for a Better World’, http://www.ilo.org/global/publications/books/WCMS_069016/lang–en/index.htm (accessed 4 February 2014).Google Scholar
Kawai, M. and Wignaraja, G. (2010), ‘Asian FTAs: Trends, Prospects, and Challenges’, Asian Development Bank Working Paper No. 226.Google Scholar
Krinks, P. (2002), The Economy of the Philippines: Elites, Inequalities and Economic Restructuring, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lim, J. (2001), ‘Detrimental Role of Biased Policies: Governance Structures and Economic Development’, in Doronila, A. (ed.), Between Fires: 15 Perspectives on the Estrada Administration, Manila: Anvil Press.Google Scholar
Linz, J. (1975), ‘Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes’, in Greenstein, F. and Polsby, N. (eds.), Handbook of Political Science Volume 3: Macropolitical Theory, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, pp. 175–411.Google Scholar
Magcamit, M.I. (2014), ‘A Case for Cohabitative Security: The Philippine and Malaysian Experience’. Journal of Human Security, 10 (1): 32–45.Google Scholar
Magno, F. (1995), ‘Traditional and New Politics in the Philippines’, in Holmes, R. (ed.), Philippine Government, Manila: De La Salle University Press.Google Scholar
Malaluan, N. (2011), ‘Philippine Trade Liberalization: Faith Damns, Losers can only Weep’, Development Roundtable Series No. 1.Google Scholar
Manacsa, R. and Tan, A. (2012), ‘Strong Republic Sidetracked: Oligarch Dynamics, Democratization, and Economic Development in the Philippines’, Korea Observer, 43 (1): 47–87.Google Scholar
Manacsa, R. (1999), ‘The Formal Structures for Political Participation: The Electoral and Party Systems in the Philippines’, in Ateneo de Manila Department of Political Science (ed.), Politics and Governance in the Philippine Context, Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press, pp. 200–1.Google Scholar
Mangabat, M. (1999), ‘Effects of Trade Liberalization on Agriculture in the Philippines: Commodity Aspects’, The CGPRT Centre Working Paper Series No. 51.Google Scholar
McCoy, A. (1994), An Anarchy of Families, Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.Google Scholar
National Anti-Poverty Commission (NAPC) (2010), ‘National Anti-Poverty Program 2010–2016’, http://maps.napc.gov.ph/napcportal/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=100&Itemid=695 (accessed 3 October 2014).Google Scholar
National Economic Development Authority (2011), ‘Philippine Development Plan 2011–2016’, http://www.neda.gov.ph/?p=1128 (accessed 4 October 2014).Google Scholar
National Statistics Office (2014), ‘Poverty Statistics’, http://www.nscb.gov.ph/poverty/ (accessed 4 October 2014).Google Scholar
Nye, J. (2011), ‘Taking Institutions Seriously: Rethinking the Political Economy of Development in the Philippines’, Asian Development Review, 28 (1): 1–21.Google Scholar
Office of the National Security Council Secretariat (2010), National Security Policy 2011–2016: Securing the Gains from Democracy, Republic of the Philippines, http://www.gov.ph/downloads/2011/08aug/NATIONAL-SECURITY-POLICY-2011-2016.pdf (accessed 4 October 2014).Google Scholar
Pasadilla, G. and Liao, C. (2005), ‘Does the Philippines Need a Trade Representative Office?’, PIDS Discussion Paper No. 2005-26.Google Scholar
Quimpo, N. (2005), ‘The Left, Elections, and the Political Party System in the Philippines’, Critical Asian Studies, 37 (1): 3–28.Google Scholar
Quimpo, N. (2009), ‘The Philippines: Predatory Regime, Growing Authoritarian Features’, The Pacific Review, 22 (3): 335–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranis, G. (1974), Sharing in Development: A Programme of Employment, Equity and Growth for the Philippines, Geneva: International Labour Organization.Google Scholar
Reyes, C. and Tabuga, A. (2011), ‘Conditional Cash Transfer Program in the Philippines: Is It Reaching the Extremely Poor?’, PIDS Discussion Paper Series No. 2012-42.Google Scholar
Sarel, M. (1994), ‘Growth in East Asia: What We Can and What We Cannot Infer From It’, IMF Working Paper No. 95/98.Google Scholar
Serrano, M. (2008), ‘Of Jobs Lost and Wages Depressed: The Impact of Trade Liberalization on Employment and Wage Levels in the Philippines, 1980–2000’, Monthly Review Foundation, 8 August, http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/2008/serrano260808.html (accessed 4 October 2014).Google Scholar
Social Weather Stations (2014), ‘First Quarter 2013 Social Weather Survey’, http://www.sws.org.ph/pr20130426.htm (accessed 4 October 2014).Google Scholar
Son, H. and Jose, J. Carangal-San (2009), ‘Equity in the Social Sector’, in Canlas, D., Khan, M., and Zhuang, J. (eds.), Diagnosing the Philippine Economy: Toward Inclusive Growth, Manila: Asian Development Bank, pp. 216–19.Google Scholar
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2005), ‘Philippine Human Development Report 2005’, http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/philippines_2005_en.pdf (accessed 4 October 2014).Google Scholar
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2010), ‘Human Development Report 2010’, http://www.ph.undp.org/content/philippines/en/home/library/human_development/2010-human-development-report/ (accessed 4 October 2014).Google Scholar
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2012), ‘Philippine Human Development Report 2012/2013’, http://www.ph.undp.org/content/philippines/en/home/library/human_development/2012–2013_PHDR.html (accessed 4 October 2014).Google Scholar
Usui, N. (2011), Transforming the Philippine Economy: Walking on Two Legs, ADB Economic Working Paper Series No. 252, Manila: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
Van de, Haar (2011), ‘Philippine Trade Policy and the Japan–Philippines Economic Partnership Agreement (JPEPA)’, Contemporary Southeast Asia, 33 (1): 113–39.Google Scholar
Villacorta, W. (1994), ‘The Curse of the Weak State: Leadership Imperatives for the Ramos Government’, Contemporary Southeast Asia, 16 (1): 67–32.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1978), Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
White, L. III (2015), Philippine Politics: Possibilities and Problems in a Localist Democracy, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wignajara, G., Lazaro, D., and de Guzman, G. (2011), ‘Philippines’, in Kawai, M. and Wignajara, G. (eds.), Asia's Free Trade Agreements How is Business Responding?, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, pp. 227–60.Google Scholar
Winters, J. (2011), Oligarchy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (2005), The Philippines Trade Policy Review, http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tpr_e/tp249_e.htm (accessed 7 October 2014).Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (2012), The Philippines Trade Policy Review, http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tpr_e/tp361_e.htm (accessed 7 October 2014).Google Scholar