Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 January 2009
The post mortem examination of the French regime in North Africa has tried to establish what went wrong, and when. It has described in detail the adverse effects of the regime upon the indigène, especially in Algeria. Rather less attention has been paid to the minority of those who, under the circumstances, prospered in various ways. The fortunes of the 25,000 Muslim Algerian landowners, for example, each with anything from 50 to 500 or more hectares, deserve to be studied. They are relevant to the current concern with the origins and growth of nationalist movements for independence. Explanations of a conflict arising inevitably out of the inequality and incompatibility of the two communities have difficulty in explaining the connexion between the nationalist leaders and the population at large. A satisfactory account should be able to identify the support for these leaders and their activities at any given time. The problem has attracted most attention in Morocco, where the success of the monarchy at the expense of the Istiqlal has called for an explanation. The well-known connexion of the Istiqlal with the Fassi community has been the starting-point of attempts to describe a political society in relation to the social and economic background of the groups and interests which it comprises. The historical investigation of this background throughout the Maghrib should provide a firm context for descriptions of political activity before and after independence.
1 J. Afr. Hist., v, 2 (1964), 221–42.
2 Paris, 1972.
3 Cf. L'Afrique du Nord en marche, 3rd ed., Preface, p. 14, and Bibliography, p. 366.
4 Johnson, ‘Algeria’, loc. cit., 240.
5 Cf. my article, Brett, M., ‘Problems in the Interpretation of the History of the Maghrib in the light of some recent publications’, J. Afr. Hist., xiii, 3 (1972), 489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Julien, Ch.-A., Histoire de l'Algérie contemporaine, Vol. I: Conqueĉte Colonisation (1827–1871) (Paris, 1964).Google Scholar
7 Ageron, Ch.-R., Histoire de I'Algérie contemporaine (Paris, 1964, 4th ed., 1970).Google Scholar
8 2 vols. (Paris, 1968).
9 Paris, 1972.
10 Les Bureaux arabes (Paris, 1953).
11 Cf. Revue d'Histoire et de Civilisation du Maghreb, 9 July 1970, 105–15.
12 Emerit, M., L'Algérie à l'époque d'Abd el-Kader (Paris, 1951).Google Scholar
13 Paris, 1969.
14 Paris, 1961.
15 Rabat, 1964.
16 Paris, 1965.
17 La Vie musulmane, 116–19.
18 Cf. Wansbrough, J., ‘The Decolonization of North African History’, J. Afr. Hist., ix, 4 (1968), 649.Google Scholar
19 Aron, R., Lavagne, F., Feller, J. and Garnier-Rizet, Y., Les Origines de la guerre d'Algérie (Paris, 1962), 224.Google Scholar
20 Ibid. 225–7.
21 Tidafi, T., L'Agriculture algérienne et ses perspectives du développetnent (Paris, 1970).Google Scholar
22 Boujedra, R., Vies quotidiennes contemporaines en Algérie (Paris, 1971).Google Scholar
23 Revue Algérienne des Sciences Juridiques, Economiques et Politiques, x, I (Mar. 1973). Number devoted to an examination of the problem of agrarian reform, 59.
24 Ibid. 47–8, 81.
25 Ibid. 148.
26 Ageron, , Histoire de l'Algérie contemporaine (1970), p. 61.Google Scholar
27 Ibid.
28 Berque, A., ‘La Bourgeoisie algérienne’, Hesperis, xxxv (1948), 1–29.Google Scholar
29 Johnson, ‘Algeria’, loc. cit., 240.
30 Corréa, , 1957; English trans., The Colonizer and the Colonized (London, 1974).Google Scholar
31 Paris, 1959.
32 London, 1970.
33 Paris, 1962; 2nd ed., 1970; English trans, of 1st ed., French North Africa (London, 1967).
34 Berkeley (Los Angeles and London, 1972).
35 Cf. e.g. Palazzoli, M., ‘The Evolution of the Moroccan National Movement since Independence’, in Brett, M., ed., Northern Africa: Islam and Modernization (London, 1973), 123–41.Google Scholar
36 London, 1970.
37 London, 1973.
38 Morocco under Colonial Rule, 69–71.
39 Ibid. 286.
40 London, 1969.
41 European Journal of Sociology, 1962.
42 London, 1973.
43 London, 1972.