Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T00:39:44.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Eastern Frontier of the Cape Colony during the Batavian Period (1803–1806)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2009

William M. Freund
William M. Freund
Affiliation:
Kirkland College, New York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

At the opening of the nineteenth century, the colonial order in South Africa was most seriously challenged on the eastern frontier, dramatized in white rebellions and the successful Xhosa-Khoi war of 1799–1802. The colonial government of the Batavian Republic, administering the Cape between 1803 and 1806, was obliged to deal with this challenge. Despite formal liberal proclamations, the Batavians believed that it was necessary to expel the Xhosa east of the Fish river and subordinate the Khoi to the white farmers once again. Their rule continued to depend on local control by the white minority. During this period, the Xhosa remained in the territory claimed by the colony. The Batavians were unsuccessful in breaking or regulating the interrelationship of white and Xhosa which was the most significant factor in frontier dynamics. At the same time, due to divisions among the Xhosa, the weakness of the whites and the skill of Lodewijk Alberti, a frontier official, the colonial order was significantly re-stabilized.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of African History , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , October 1972 , pp. 631 - 645
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 For one contemporary view, see Barnard, Lady Anne, South Africa A Century Ago (London, 1901), pp. 232–4.Google Scholar The concept of a frontier zone has been developed and amplified by DrLegassick, Martin in ‘The Frontier Tradition in South African Historiography’, unpublished seminar paper, Institute of Commonwealth Studies, London, 1971.Google Scholar

3 de Mist, J. A., Memorandum, translated by Jeffreys, K. M. (Cape Town, 1920).Google Scholar

4 De Mist, 165, 193, 202, 211, 246, 252, 254, 256, for some references to Barrow.

5 De Mist to Janssens, 12 Mar. 1804, after his tour of the colony. Algemeen Rijksarchief, The Hague, Inventory 86 (henceforth AR), Aziatische Raad, 301, p. 459.

6 For examples from Batavian officials, see van Pallandt, Baron A., General Remarks on the Cape of Good Hope (reprint transl. from the Dutch) (Cape Town, 1920), 18 ff.Google Scholar and di Capelli, W. B. E. Paravicini, Reize in de Binnelanden van Zuid-Afrika, ed. by de Kock, W. J. (Cape Town, 1965), 18–19.Google Scholar

7 De Mist, 198.Google Scholar

8 Alberti, Lodewijk, Alberti's Account of the Tribal Life and Customs of the Xhosa in 1807, translated by Fehr, William (Cape Town, 1968), 97.Google Scholar

9 Janssens to Aziatische Raad, 55 Sept. 1803, AR, Aziatische Raad, 311, p. 36.Google Scholar

10 Lichtenstein, , Travels in Southern Africa in the Years 1803, 4, 5 & 6, transl. by Plumptre, Anne (Cape Town, 1928), 1, 5. Janssens's viewpoint is put on p. 380. See a similar statement in Alberti, 100.Google Scholar

11 Alberti, 101–2.Google Scholar

12 Godée-Molsbergen, E. C., ed., Reizen in Zuid-Afrika in de Hollandsche Tijd (Linschoten Society XXXVI, Amsterdam, 1932), 172.Google Scholar

13 van Reenen, Dirk Gysbert, Die Joernaal van…, translated by Franken, J. M. L. and Murray, Ian (Cape Town, 1937) 291;Google Scholarvan Pallandt, 24; Alberti, 110; de Mist, 254–5; Janssens in AR, Ministerie van Koophandel en Kolonïen, 3,132. Van Pallandt and van Reenen specified the desirability of a Khoi patrol force. Alberti wanted whites from frontier districts excluded.Google Scholar

14 Janssens to Staats-Bewind, 21 Dec. 1804, AR, Aziatische Raad, 311, pp. 155–6Google Scholar and van Reenen, 139, 282–3.Google Scholar

15 For the former, see especially Walker, Eric, History of Southern Africa (London, 1959, latest edition)Google Scholar and Cambridge History of the British Empire, VII (1936)Google Scholar. For the latter, van der Merwe, J. P., Die Kaap onder die Bataafse Republiek 1803–1806 (Amsterdam, 1926)Google Scholar, van Zyl, M. C. in Muller, C. F. J., ed., Five Hundred Years of South African History (Pretoria, 1968)Google Scholar and Murray, A. H., The Political Philosophy of J. A. de Mist (Cape Town, n.d.). The society excluding the Xhosa would, of course, still have contained a Khoi and slave majority.Google Scholar

16 Theal, G. M., A History of South Africa since 1795, I (London, 1908), 279.Google Scholar

17 For an example from 1806, see AR, Ministerie van Koophandel en Kolonïen, 3, 232, p. 22.Google Scholar

18 Eybers, G. W., ed., Bepalingen en instructïen voor het Bestuur van de Buitendistricten van de Kaap de Goede Hoop (Amsterdam, 1922), 88–9.Google Scholar

19 For the former, Janssens to Aziatische Raad, 8 Jan. 1805, AR, Aziatische Raad, 311, p. 262.Google Scholar For the latter, see AR, Ministerie van Koophandel en Kolonïen, 3, 132, p. 22.Google Scholar

20 For the first, AR, Ministerie van Koophandel en Kolonïen, 3, 232, pp. 18–19Google Scholar, for the second, Janssens to van der Kemp, 16 May 1805, London Missionary Society Archives, South Africa, Correspondence, Box 3.Google Scholar

21 Truter to Alberti, 26 May, 1804, Cape Archives (henceforth CA), Inventory Batavian Republic (henceforth BR), 55, p. 227. (Author's translation).Google Scholar

22 I prefer here my own translation from the 1810 Dutch edition of Alberti's book, 218.Google Scholar

23 Alberti, 101.Google Scholar

24 For examples, Alberti to Stockenstrom, 17 July 1804, CA, Magistrates' Office, 2/4, Graaff Reinet, 11/29;Google Scholar or veldkornet de Beer, to Stockenstrom, 24 Apr. 1804, CA, Magistrates' Office, 2/4, Graaff Reinet, 12/1.Google Scholar

25 The government also created the new district of Tulbagh on the northern frontier in 1804.Google Scholar

26 CA, Colonial Office 2559/II.Google Scholar

27 Alberti, 110.Google Scholar

28 Account of a Conference with S'lambie, 28 Aug. 1805, CA, 41, pp. 29, 45.Google Scholar For General Janssens's meeting, see Godée-Molsbergen, XXXVI, 148–52;Google Scholarvan Reenen, 93–123; Paravicini, 89–93; Lichtenstein, 1, 383–8.Google Scholar

29 For accounts of this meeting, see Godée-Molsbergen, XXXVI, 169–71;Google Scholarvan Reenen, 173–93; Paravicini, 123–40; Lichtenstein, 1, 393–404.Google Scholar The official statement is in Janssens to Aziatische Raad, 15 Sept. 1803, AR, Aziatische Raad, 311, p. 38.Google Scholar

30 Alberti to Janssens, 20 Feb. 1805, CA, BR 5, p. 745;Google ScholarLichtenstein, 1, 435–6. For de Mist's trip generally, Lichtenstein is the best source.Google Scholar

31 22 May 1805, CA, BR 12, p. 1639.Google Scholar

32 Alberti to Janssens, 28 Aug. 1805, CA, BR 71, p. 32. (Author's translation).Google Scholar

33 For his policy generally, see Alberti, 107–11; Stockenstrcn to Alberti, 3 Mar. 1805, CA, Magistrates' Office, 2/4, Graaff Reinet 11/29; information given to Cuyler, CA, Colonial Office 2659/11.Google Scholar

34 Janssens to Stockenstrom, 10 Aug. 1804, CA, Magistrates' Office, 2/4, Graaif Reinet, 8/1a;Google Scholarvan Reenen, 131–3; Paravicini, 76–7.Google Scholar The loophole is stressed in Spilhaus, M. Whiting, South Africa in the Making, 1652–1806 (Cape Town, 1966), 327.Google Scholar

35 Janssens to Stockenstrom, 22 June, 1804, CA, Magistrates' Office, 2/4, Graaif Reinet, 8/1a. (Author's translation).Google Scholar

36 Alberti to Stockenstrom, 12 July 1804, CA, Magistrates' Office, 2/4, Graaif Reinet, 11/29.Google Scholar

37 Van Reenen, 144–50.Google Scholar

38 For figures, see CA Opgaafrolle; Barrow, 11, passimGoogle Scholar and Sir Cory, George, The Rise of South Africa, I (London, 1910), 154.Google Scholar

39 Alberti to Janssens, 6 Nov. 1804, CA, BR 9, pp. 4065 ff.Google Scholar

40 CA, Magistrates' Office, 2/4, Graaff Reinet, 11/29, 3 Sept. 1804.Google Scholar

41 CA, Conference notes, governor and landdrosten, 30 Dec. 1804.Google Scholar

42 For accounts of this meeting, see Godée-Molsbergen, XXXVI, 136–08;Google ScholarParavicini, 67–70, 88–9; van Reenen, 81–7 and Lichtenstein, I, 382–3.Google Scholar

43 Janssens to Alberti, 25 July 1805, CA, BR 68, p. 415.Google Scholar

44 Lichtenstein, I, 8.Google Scholar

45 There are, however, some examples of veldkornetten defying local opinion. Lichtenstein witnessed an attempted impeachment of a veldkornet, after he persisted in an investigation of the death by axing of a servant girl in which her master was implicated. ‘Memorie’ in AR, Verzameling J. W. Janssens, 7.Google Scholar

46 Stockenstrom to Janssens, 7 July 1804, CA, Magistrates' Office, 2/4, Graaff Reinet, 16/1–3.Google Scholar

47 CA, BR 2, 18 Apr. 1803.Google Scholar

48 For surviving lists see CA, Magistrates' Office, 2/28, Stellenbosch, 18/175 and Opgaafrolle, 22A (Hottentot Huurloonlyst 1801–11).Google Scholar

49 Stockenstrom to Janssens, 2 Jan. 1805, CA, Magistrates' Office, 2/4 Graaff Reinet, 1613;Google ScholarAlberti to Stockenstrom, 12 July 1804, CA, Magistrates' Office, 2/4, Graaff Reinet, 11/29.Google Scholar

50 CA, British Occupation 55, 24 July 1802, pp. 152–59. I am thankful to Dr Shula Marks for this citation.Google Scholar

51 Janssens to Aziatische Raad, 15 Sept. 1803, AR, Aziatische Raad, 311, p. 37;Google ScholarJanssens to de Mist, 6 July 1803Google Scholar in Theal, G. M., Belangrike Historische Dokumenten, III, (Cape Town, 1911), 234.Google Scholar

52 London Missionary Society (henceforth L.M.S.) Archives, South Africa, Corresponderice, Box 2, Annual Report, Bethelsdorp (extracts).Google Scholar

53 Van de Kemp to Janssens, 8 Apr. 1804, CA, BR 55, p. 222. Also in L.M.S. Archives, South Africa, Correspondence, Box 2.Google Scholar

54 Proclamation of 20 Feb. 1805 in Martin, A. D., Doctor Vanderkemp (London, n.d.), 149.Google Scholar For Khoi protest at the ban on teaching writing, see L.M.S. Archives, South Africa, Correspondence, Box 2, Annual Report, Bethelsdorp, 1803 (extracts).

55 Janssens to Aziatische Raad, 8 Jan. 1805, AR, Aziatische Raad, 311, p. 261. (Author's translation).Google Scholar

56 Van der Kemp to Janasens, 19 Apr. 1805, L.M.S. Archives, South Africa, Correspondence, Box 3.Google Scholar

57 Janssens to van der Kemp, 16 May 1805, L.M.S. Archives, South Africa, Correspondence, Box 3.Google Scholar

58 AR, Ministerie van Koophandel en Kolonïen, 3, 132.Google Scholar

59 van der Kemp's career, the best sources are Martin op. cit. and Brigga, D. R., ‘An Historical Survey of the Bethelsdorp Station of the London Missionary Society… until the Death of Dr. van der Kemp’, B.Div. thesis, Rhodes University, 1952.Google Scholar See also my article, ‘The career of Johannes Theodorus van der Kemp and his role in the History of South Africa’ in Tijdrchrift voor Geschiedenis (Leiden), forthcoming.Google Scholar

60 Cuyler, Alberti's successor, reported a deluge of settler complaints about this despite Alberti's assurances of their satisfaction with the current situation. Cuyler to Lieutenant-Governor, 18 Mar. 1806, CA, Colonial Office 2559/11.Google Scholar

61 Heemraden were white residents appointed on the basis of double-lists submitted by their predecessors, to serve with the landdrost as a court with judicial and administrative powers.Google Scholar

62 Janssens to de Mist, 6 July 1803Google Scholar in Theal, Belangrijke Historische Dokumenten, III, 233.Google Scholar

63 For the van Rensburg case, see Alberti to Janssens, 20 June 1805, CA, BR 68, pp. 311 ff.; 12 June 1805, CA, BR 68, pp. 268–69; 30 Aug. 1805, CA, BR 71, p. 33; 5 Nov. 1805, CA, BR 73, p. 293; 10 Oct. 1805, CA, BR 72, pp. 87–8;Google ScholarJaussens to Alberti, 25 July 1805, CA, BR 68, p. 416 and Cuyler to Lieutenant Governor, CA, Colonial Office, 2559/11.Google Scholar

64 Janssens and Raad van Politie to Aziatische Raad, 29 Aug. 1804, AR, Aziatische Raad, 309, p. 175. (Author's translation).Google Scholar

65 In Wilson, M. and Thompson, L. M., Oxford History of South Africa, 1 (Oxford, 1969), 245.Google Scholar

66 This paper has omitted a discussion of the northern frontier and of the San, who were still carrying on a very successful resistance against white expansion, but it may be stated briefly that the brutal war carried on against the San by the colonial commandos continued unabated in the Batavian period, despite the fitfully benevolent intentions of the government.Google Scholar