Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wbk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-09T07:39:28.573Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Agricultural Economics in the New Millennium: Lessons from the Old Millennium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Hal Harris*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Clemson University

Abstract

It is appropriate as we enter a new century that we reflect on the past one since our profession is nearly 100 years old: the American Association of Farm Economics was formally created in 1910. “Savvy through one hundred years of progress and experience” is one description that comes to mind. “Geriatric” is another word that might fit. I intend to highlight some broad topics that have occupied agricultural economists' teaching and research over the past 100 years, to reflect in a little more detail about our thoughts over the past 12 years as revealed in the presidential addresses at AAEA and SAEA annual meetings, to make some rather terse comments about current important issues as they relate to the issues of the past, and to conclude with some advice for the younger members of our profession and our association that may be of value in the new century. I emphasize the word may, because I am much less certain about the wisdom of my beliefs today than if I had been given the opportunity to give this talk 18 or even 11 years ago.

Type
Presidential Address
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adrian, John. “Undergraduate Education in the Departments of Agricultural Economics in the South: Status, Challenges, and Opportunities.” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 22(1990):19.Google Scholar
Antle, John M.The New Economics of Agriculture.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81(1999):9931010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armbruster, Walter J.Challenges for Agricultural Economists Facing the Twenty-First Century.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79(1997):13731382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, Peter J.Coordinating Research, Extension, and Outreach in Agricultural Economics.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75(1993):10911101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batie, Sandra S.Agriculture As the Problem: New Agendas and New Opportunities.” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 20(1988):111.Google Scholar
Batie, Sandra S.Sustainable Development: Challenges to the Profession of Agricultural Economics.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71(1989):10831101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beattie, Bruce R.Some Almost-Ideal Remedies for Healing Land Grant Universities.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73(1991):13071321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boggess, William G.The Poverty of Applied Policy Analysis.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 27(1995):112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broder, Josef M.Empiricism and the Art of Teaching.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 26(1994):118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capps, Oral Jr.The Food Distribution Industry: Untapped Clientele for Agricultural Economists.” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 24(1992):110.Google Scholar
Christy, Ralph D.Economic Correctness and Agricultural Economics.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 25(1993):113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christy, Ralph D.Markets or Government? Balancing Imperfect and Complementary Alternatives.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78(1996):11451156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Covey, Stephen R.The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People, Simon and Schuster, 1989.Google Scholar
Duffy, Patricia A.Is the New Deal Dead? Government, Economics and the Rural South.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 29(1997):115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eidman, Vernon R.The Continuing Search for Relevance in Agricultural Economics.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77(1995):10831095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houck, James P.The Comparative Advantage of Agricultural Economists.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 74(1992):10591065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Warren E.Structural Change and the Recognition of Diversity.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72(1990):11091123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Libby, Lawrence W.Professional Diversity in Agricultural Economics: Salvation or Suicide?Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 23(1991):114.Google Scholar
Libby, Lawrence W.Conflict on the Commons: Natural Resource Entitlements, the Public Interest, and Agricultural Economics.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76(1994):9971009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manderscheid, Lester V.Undergraduate Educational Opportunities in the Face of Declining Enrollments.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70(1988):985993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchant, Mary A.Hopes and Fears: The New World Trade Negotiations and Southern Agriculture.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 31(1999):185200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pound, G.S.Report of the Committee on Research Advisory to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Research Council, 1972.Google Scholar
Reinschmiedt, Lynn L.The Information Age University.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 28(1996):111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segarra, Eduardo. “Current State and Future Directions of the Southern Agricultural Economics Association.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 30(1998):119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shumway, C. Richard. “Values, Changing Forces, Choices, and the Profession.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80(1998):887897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trapp, James N.The Dawning of the New Age of Dynamic Theory: Its Implications For Agricultural Economics Research and Teaching.” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 21(1989):111.Google Scholar