Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T08:31:51.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Alternative Acreage Restriction Provisions on Alabama Cotton Farms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

Anne M. Mims
Affiliation:
Alabama Cooperative Extension Service
Patricia A. Duffy
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Auburn University
George Young
Affiliation:
Alabama Cooperative Extension Service

Abstract

The 1985 Farm Bill departs from recent farm bills in moving toward more restrictive acreage control. The change from a two- to a five-year average in calculating base acreage and enforcement of limited cross-compliance appear to significantly alter crop mix decisions on representative Alabama cotton farms.

Type
Submitted Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alabama Agricultural Statistics Service. Alabama Department of Agriculture and Industries. Alabama Agriculture Perspective. Montgomery, Alabama, January 20,1987.Google Scholar
Alabama Cooperative Extension Service. Alabama Cooperative Extension Service budgets. Auburn, Alabama, 1986.Google Scholar
Alabama Crop and Livestock Reporting Service. Alabama Agricultural Statistics. Montgomery, Alabama, 1973-1986.Google Scholar
Alabama Farm Financial Analysis Association. Unpublished Alabama Farm Financial Analysis Association records. Auburn, Alabama, 1985-1986.Google Scholar
Duffy, P.A., and Knutson, R.D.. “Reflections on Agricultural Policies and Their Consequences for the South.” In The Rural South in Crisis. Ed. Beaulieu, L. J.. Boulder: Westview Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Heady, E.O.. “The Economics of Rotations with Farm and Production Policy Applications.J. Farm Econ., 30(1948):645664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowles, G.J. “Estimating Utility of Gain Functions for Southwest Minnesota Farmers.” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Minnesota, 1979.Google Scholar
Kramer, R.A., and Pope, R.P.. “Participation in Farm Commodity Programs: A Stochastic Dominance Analysis.Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 63(1981):119128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, W., Dean, G.W., and Moore, C.V.. “An Empirical Test of Utility vs. Profit Maximization in Agricultural Production.Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 56(1974):497508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMillan, C. Mathematical Programming, Wiley: New York, 1970.Google Scholar
Musser, W.N., and Stamoulis, K.G.. “Evaluating the Food and Agriculture Act of 1977 with Firm Quadratic Risk Programming.Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 63(1981):448456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, G.M. “Toward a Holistic Approach to the Cropping Mix Decision.” Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Texas A&M University, August 1985.Google Scholar
Persuad, T. and Mapp, H.P. Jr. “Analysis of Alternative Production and Marketing Strategies in Southwestern Oklahoma: A MOTAD Approach.” Risk Analysis in Agriculture: Research and Educational Development. Department of Agricultural Economics, AE-4492, University of Illinois, June 1980.Google Scholar
Richardson, J.W., and Nixon, C.J.. “Description of FLIPSIM: A General Firm Level Policy Simulation Model.” Bulletin No. B-1528 of the Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, 1986.Google Scholar
Scott, J.T. Jr, and Baker, C.B.. “A Practical Way to Select an Optimum Farm Plan Under Risk.Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 54(1972):657660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stucker, B.C, and Collins, K.J.. “The Food Security Act of 1985: Major Provisions Affecting Commodities.” U.S.D.A.-E.R.S. Agricultural Information Bulletin 497. Washington D.C. 1986.Google Scholar
Touchton, J.T., Thurlow, D.L., and Cope, J.T. Jr. “Crop Rotations.” Soybeans Research Report 1986. Research Report Series No. 5. Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station. Auburn, Alabama, 1981.Google Scholar
United States General Accounting Office. Farm Payments, Analysis of Proposals to Amend the $50,000 Payment Limit. Washington D.C. 1987.Google Scholar
Vandeputte, J.M., and Baker, C.B.. “Specifying the Allocation of Income Among Taxes, Consumption, and Savings in Linear Programming Models.Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 52(1970):521527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, P.N.Structural Determinants of the Swine Production Industry: A Stochastic Dominance Analysis.” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Minnesota, 1982.Google Scholar