Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T13:11:09.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Environmental Effects of Adopting IPM Techniques: The Case of Peach Producers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Jorge Fernandez-Cornejo  and
Jennifer Ferraioli
Jorge Fernandez-Cornejo
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1800 M Street, Room 4052, Washington, DC 20036-5831
Jennifer Ferraioli
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1800 M Street, Room 4052, Washington, DC 20036-5831
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The impact of adopting integrated pest management (IPM) techniques is examined for peach producers in eight states accounting for most of the U.S. production. The method accounts for self-selectivity, simultaneity, and the pesticide demand equations are theoretically consistent with a restricted-profit function. Biological pest management techniques tend to reduce pesticide use and pesticide toxicity substantially, while pesticide-efficiency techniques (using scouting and economic thresholds) have an increasing effect on pesticide use and toxicity, and cultural techniques have an insignificant effect on pesticide use and toxicity.

Keywords

biological techniquescultural techniquesintegrated pest managementpeach productionpesticide useself-selectiontoxicity
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , December 1999 , pp. 551 - 564
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, W.A., Rajotte, E.G., Kazmierczak, R.K. Jr., Lambur, M.T., and Norton, G.W.. “The National Evaluation of Extension's Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Programs.” VCES Publication 491-010, Virginia Cooperative Extension Service and USDA Extension Service. Blacksburg, VA, 1987.Google Scholar
Ben-Akiva, M. and S. Lerman, . Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Series in Transportation studies. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Bultena, G.L. “Sociological Factors in Conservation Adoptions: A Study of Reduced Tillage and IPM.” Proceedings of North Central Region Workshop on Integration of Pest Management and Conservation Tillage, St. Louis, MO, 1985.Google Scholar
Burrows, T.M. “Pesticide Demand and Integrated Pest Management: A Limited Dependent Variable Analysis.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 65(1983):806–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browner, C., Rominger, R., and D. Kessler, . Testimony before the Subcommittee on Department Operations, and Nutrition, Committee on Agriculture, U.S. House of Representatives. Washington, DC, September 22, 1993.Google Scholar
Cohrssen, J.J. and Covello, V.T.. Risk Analysis: A Guide to Principles and Methods for Analyzing Health and Environmental Risks. National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC, 1988.Google Scholar
Diewert, W.E. “Applications of Duality Theory.” In Frontiers of Quantitative Economics, Vol. II, ed. Intriligato, M.D.. and Kendrick, D.A... Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishers, 1974.Google Scholar
Diewert, W.E. and L. Ostensoe, . “Flexible Functional Forms and Global Curvature Conditions.” In Dynamic Econometric Modeling, ed. Barnett, W., Berndt, E., and H. White, . Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Dwivedi, T.D. and Srivastava, V.K.. “Optimality of Least Squares in the Seemingly Unrelated Model.” Journal of Econometrics 6(1978):391–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farm Chemicals Handbook '97. Willoughby, Ohio: Meister Publishing Company, 1997.Google Scholar
Feder, G., Just, R.J., and D. Zilberman, . “Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries: A Survey,” Economic Development and Cultural Change (1985):255–298.Google Scholar
Fernandez-Cornejo, J. “The Microeconomic Impact of IPM Adoption: Theory and Application.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 25(1996):149–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez-Cornejo, J. “Environmental and Economic Consequences of Technology Adoption: IPM in Viticulture.” Agricultural Economics 18(1998): 145–155Google Scholar
Fernandez-Cornejo, J. and S. Jans, . “Quality-Adjusted Price and Quantity Indices for Pesticides.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77,2(1995):645–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez-Cornejo, J. and S. Jans, . “The Economic Impact of IPM Adoption for Orange Producers in California and Florida.” Acta Horticulturae 429(1996):325–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez-Cornejo, J., Beach, E.D., and Huang, Wen-Yuan. “The Adoption of IPM Techniques By Vegetable Growers in Florida, Michigan, and Texas.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 1(1994): 158–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, W.H.Econometric Analysis. Second Edition. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1993.Google Scholar
Hall, D.C. “The Profitability of Integrated Pest Management: Case Studies for Cotton and Citrus in the San Joaquin Valley.” Entomological Society Bulletin 23(1977):267–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, D.C. and Duncan, G.M.. “Econometric Evaluation of New Technology with an Application to Integrated Pest Management.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66(1984): 624–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammitt, J.K. Estimating consumer willingness to pay to reduce food-borne risk. Report R-3447-EPA, The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, 1986.Google Scholar
Harper, J.K. and Greene, G.M.. “Selection of Peach Rootstocks Under Risk.” Selected Paper presented at the 1993 NAREA meetings, Mystic, CT, February 1993.Google Scholar
Harper, J.K., Rister, M.E., Mjelde, J.W., Drees, B.M., and Way, M.O.. “Factors Influencing the Adoption of Insect Management Technology,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72(1990):996–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, J.J. “The Common Structure of Statistical Models of Truncation, Sample Selection and Limited Dependent Variables and a Simple Estimator for Such Models.” Annals of Economics and Social Measurements 5(1976):475–491.Google Scholar
Hokkanen, H.M.T. “New Approaches in Biological Control.” In CRC Handbook of Pest Management in Agriculture, Vol. II., ed. D. Pimentel, and Hanson, A*.A.. CRC Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Just, R.E., Zilberman, D., and Rauser, G.C.. “A Putty-Clay Approach to the Distributional Effects of New Technology Under Risk,” Operations Research in Agriculture and Water Resources (ed. D. Yaron, and C. Tapiero, ). New York: North Holland Publishing Company, 1980.Google Scholar
Kovach, J., and Tette, J.P.. “A Survey of the Use of IPM by New York Apple Producers,” Agricultural Ecosystems and Environment 20(1988): 101–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovach, J., Petzoldt, C., Degni, J., and J. Tette, . “A Method to Measure the Environmental Impact of Pesticides.” New York's Food and Life Sciences Bulletin, No. 132. Cornell University, 1992.Google Scholar
Marrone, P.G. “Bts: Success Just Beginning.” Farm Chemicals, (September 1994): C34–38.Google Scholar
Napit, K.B., Norton, G.W., Kazmierczak, R.F., and Rajotte, E.G.. “Economic Impacts of Extension Integrated Pest Management Programs in Several States.” J. Economics Entomology 81 (1988):251–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, G.W. and J. Mullen, . “Economic Evaluation of Integrated Pest Management Programs: a Literature Review.” Virginia Cooperative Extension. Publication 448–120. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, March 1994.Google Scholar
Office of Technology Assessment. Pest Management Strategies, Vol. I. Washington, DC, 1979, pp.11–16.Google Scholar
Sailer, R.I., “Extent of Biological and Cultural Control of Insect Pests of Crops.” In CRC Handbook of Pest Management in Agriculture, Vol II., pp.1–12, ed. D. Pimentel, , Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Inc., 1991a.Google Scholar
U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Agricultural Research. Service. “USDA Programs Related to Integrated Pest Management.” USDA Program Aid 1506, 1993.Google Scholar
U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistical Service. “Agriculture Chemical Usage: 1995 Fruits Summary,” July 1996.Google Scholar
U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. “Agricultural Resources and Environmental Indicators, 1996–97.” Agricultural Handbook 712, July 1997a.Google Scholar
U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. “Fruit and Tree Nuts: Situation and Outlook Report,” FTS-281, October 1997b.Google Scholar
Vandeman, A., Fernandez-Cornejo, J., Jans, S., and B.H.L. In “Adoption of Integrated Pest Management in U.S. Agriculture.” Agriculture Information Bulletin No. 707, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, September 1994.Google Scholar
Wetzstein, M.E., Musser, W.N., Linder, D.K., and Douce, G.K.. “An Evaluation of Integrated Pest Management with Heterogeneous Participation.” Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 10(1985):344–353.Google Scholar
Yee, J. and W. Ferguson, . “Sample Selection Model Assessing Professional Scouting Programs and Pesticide Use in Cotton Production.” Agribusiness 12(1996):291–300.3.0.CO;2-W>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zellner, A. “An Efficient Method for Estimatine Seemingly Unrelated Regression and Test of Aggregation Bias.” Journal of American Statisticians Association 57(1962):348–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar