Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T09:46:37.698Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of Reducing Federal Order Class I Differential on Representative Texas and New Mexico Dairy Farms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

Joe L. Outlaw ,
Ronald D. Knutson ,
Robert B. Schwart Jr ,
John Holt ,
James W. Richardson  and
Dalton H. Garis
Joe L. Outlaw
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculutral Economics atTexas A&M University
Ronald D. Knutson
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculutral Economics atTexas A&M University
Robert B. Schwart Jr
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculutral Economics atTexas A&M University
John Holt
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculutral Economics atTexas A&M University
James W. Richardson
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculutral Economics atTexas A&M University
Dalton H. Garis
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Resource Economics at theUniversity of Florida
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The General Accounting Office (GAO) recommended that the USDA substantially reduce or eliminate the extent of price discrimination practiced under federal milk marketing orders. The purpose of this study was to quantify the impacts of alternative means of implementing the GAO proposal on the economic viability of Texas and New Mexico dairy farms. Five dairy farms were simulated for six years under the current dairy policy and five alternative proposals. Results of the analyses indicate that large New Mexico dairies can remain economically viable under all of the alternatives. On the other hand, federal order policy changes would accelerate the loss of equity for moderate size Texas dairy farms.

Keywords

dairyfederal market orderClass I differential
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , December 1991 , pp. 19 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babb, E. M. Future of Dairy Marteting Orders, Food and Resource Economics Department, Staff Report 363, University of Florida, July 1989.Google Scholar
Buxton, B. M., McGuckin, T., Selley, R., and Willett, G.. Milk Production: A Four-State Earnings Comparison. Washington D.C.: USDA, ERS, Ag. Econ. Rep. No. 528, February 1985.Google Scholar
Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute. FAPRI July 1990 Forecast: Macro, Prices Paid Indices and Cost of Production. Iowa State University and University of Missouri-Columbia, Staff Report, July 1990.Google Scholar
Garis, D. H. “Economic Impacts of Removing the Distance Differential on Texas Dairy Farms.” M.S. thesis. Texas A&M University, 1989.Google Scholar
McDowell, H., Fleming, A. M., and Fallert, R. F.. Federal Milk Marketing Orders: An Analysis of Alternative Policies, Washington D.C.: USDA, ERS, Ag. Econ.Rep. No. 598, September 1988.Google Scholar
Pratt, J., Keniston, M. and Novakovic, A.. Geographic Price Relationships in the U.S. Fluid Milk Industry: A Mathematical Programming Analysis. Cornell Ag. Econ. Staff Paper No. 89-16, May 1989.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. W., and Nixon, C. J.. Description of FLIPSIM V: A General Firm Level Policy Simulation Model. Texas Ag. Exp. Sta. Bull., B-1528, Texas A&M University, 1986.Google Scholar
Schwart, R. B. “Texas Moves Ahead in Dairying”, Hoard's Dairyman, Vol. 133, No. 12, July 1988.Google Scholar
Seton, N. J. “Future Growth In the Texas Dairy Industry.” M.S. thesis, Texas A&M University, May 1986.Google Scholar
Texas Milk Market Order Administrator. Texas Milk Market Report. Texas Milk Marketing Order, Federal Order 126, Vol. 55, No. 6, June, 1989.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Dairy: Situation and Outlook Report. Washington D.C.: USDA, ERS, DS-424, April 1990.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Economic Indicators of the Farm Sector: Costs of Production — Livestock and Dairy, 1989. Washington D.C.: USDA, ERS, ECIFS 9-1, August 1990.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Federal Milk Order Market Statistics: Annual Summary. Washington D.C.: Agricultural Marketing Service, various issues 1980-89.Google Scholar
U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO). Milk Marketing Orders: Options for Change. Washington D.C.: GAO/RCED, 88-9, March 1988.Google Scholar
Yonkers, R. D. “Impacts of Exogenously-Determined Variables on Dairy Farms: A Simulation Modeling Approach.” Ph.D. thesis. Texas A&M University, 1989.Google Scholar