Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:10:27.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Limited Access to Conservation: Limited-Resource Farmer Participation in the Conservation Security Program in the Southeast

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Jason S. Bergtold  and
Joseph J. Molnar
Jason S. Bergtold
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Joseph J. Molnar
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Auburn University, AL
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper examines the joint adoption of conservation tillage, crop rotations, and soil testing by small and limited-resource farmers in the Southeast. The objectives are to determine the potential eligibility of small farmers for the Conservation Security Program, examine socioeconomic factors affecting adoption, and assess the interdependence between adopting different conservation practices. Results indicate that conservation management, ethnicity, and farm characteristics affect practice adoption. Of the producers surveyed in the study, 7% meet Conservation Security Program eligibility requirements, while the other 93% have less than a 20% likelihood of adopting the needed practices to qualify.

Keywords

adoptionconservationConservation Security Programconservation tillagelimited-resource farmerslogistic regressionsmall farmssoil testingC35Q12Q58
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 42 , Issue 2 , May 2010 , pp. 211 - 227
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akobundu, E., Alwang, J., Essel, A., Norton, G.W., and Tegene, A. “Does Extension Work? Impacts of a Program to Assist Limited-Resource Farmers in Virginia.” Review of Agricultural Economics 26(2004):361–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagi, F.S. “A Logit Model of an Extension Agent's Choice to Visit Individual Farms.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 32(1984):211–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. Jr., Christy, R.D., and Gebre-medhin, T.G. “Structural Changes in U.S. Agriculture: Implications for African American Farmers.” The Review of Black Political Economy 22(1994):51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, C. “Congressional Hearing on Working Lands Conservation.” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 62(2007):23A.Google Scholar
Davis, L. “Limited-Resource Farmers: The Impact of Farm Policy.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73(1991):1476–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demissie, E. “Improving Government Farm Programs for Limited-Resource Farmers.” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 44(1989):388–91.Google Scholar
Dunlap, R.E., and VanLiere, K.D. “Commitment to the Dormant Social Paradigm and Concern for Environmental Quality.” Social Science Quarterly 65(1984):1012–28.Google Scholar
Featherstone, A.M., and Goodwin, B.K. “Factors Influencing a Farmer's Decision to Invest in Long-Term Conservation Improvements.” Land Economics 69(1993):67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuglie, K.O., and Bosch, D.J. “Economic and Environmental Implications of Soil Nitrogen Testing: A Switch-Regression Analysis.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77(1995):891–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glancey, J.L. “Vegetable Production Machine Design.” Encyclopedia of Agricultural, Food and Biological Engineering. Hedlman, D.R., ed., pp. 1105–15. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc., 2003.Google Scholar
Goodman, L.A., and Kruskal, W.H. “Measures of Association for Cross Classifications.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 49(1954):732–64.Google Scholar
Gould, B.W., Saupe, W.E., and Klemme, R.M. “Conservation Tillage: The Role of the Farm and Operator Characteristics and the Perception of Soil Erosion.” Land Economics 65(1989):167–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gourieroux, C.Econometrics of Qualitative Dependent Variables. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, W.H.Econometric Analysis, 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc., 2003.Google Scholar
Kabii, T., and Horwitz, P. “A Review of Landholder Motivations and Determinants for Participation in Conservation Covenanting Programmes.” Environmental Conservation 33(2006):11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, K.Y., Zeger, S.L., and Qaqish, B. “Multivariate Regression Analysis for Categorical Data.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series Methodological B. 54,1(1992):3–10.Google Scholar
Molnar, J., Bitto, A., and Brant, G. “Core Conservation Practices: Adoption Barriers Perceived by Small and Limited-Resource Farmers.” Bulletin 646. Auburn University, Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station, May 2001.Google Scholar
National Agricultural Statistics Service, USDA. “Table 56: Summary by Market Value of Agricultural Products Sold:2002.” The Census of Agriculture, 2002 Census Publications, Volume 1, Chapter 1: Alabama Level Data. 2002a. Internet site: http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2002/Volume_l,_Chapter_l_State_Level/Alabama/st01_l_056_056.pdf (Accessed November 30, 2009).Google Scholar
National Agricultural Statistics Service, USDA. “Table 56: Summary by Market Value of Agricultural Products Sold:2002.” The Census of Agriculture, 2002 Census Publications, Volume 1, Chapter 1: Georgia Level Data. 2002b. Internet site: http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2002/Volume_1,_Chapter_l_State_Level/Georgia/stl3_l_056_056.pdf (Accessed November 30, 2009).Google Scholar
National Agricultural Statistics Service, USDA. “Table 56: Summary by Market Value of Agricultural Products Sold:2002.” The Census of Agriculture, 2002 Census Publications, Volume 1, Chapter 1: Mississippi Level Data. 2002c. Internet site: http://www.agcensus. usda.gov/Publications/2002/Volume_l,_Chapter_l_State_Level/Mississippi/st28_l_056_056.pdf (Accessed November 30, 2009).Google Scholar
National Commission on Small Farms, United States Department of Agriculture. “A Time to Act: A Report of the USDA National Commission on Small Farms.” Miscellaneous Publication 1545. January 1998. Internet site: http://www.csrees.usda.gov/nea/ag_systems/pdfs/time_to_act_1998.pdf (Accessed November 1, 2009).Google Scholar
Natural Resource Conservation Service, USDA. “Conservation Security Program: Interim Final Rule with Request for Comments.” Federal Register 7 CFR Part 1469. 69(June 12, 2004):34502–32.Google Scholar
Natural Resource Conservation Service, USDA. “Conservation Security Program: Interim Final Rule with Request for Comments.” Federal Register 7 CFR Part 1469. 70(March 2005):15201–23.Google Scholar
Natural Resource Conservation Service, USDA. “Choctawhatchee River Watershed CSP Preliminary Checklist,” Alabama State Office. 2008. Internet site: ftp://ftp-fc.sc.egov.usda.gov/AL/tech/csp08/csp_prelim_checklist08.pdf (Accessed October 1, 2009).Google Scholar
Nelson, M.C., Brown, N.B. Jr., and Toomer, L.F. “Limited-Resource Farmers' Productivity: Some Evidence from Georgia.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73(1991):1480–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onianwa, O., Wheelock, G., and Hendrix, G. “Factors Affecting Conservation Practice Behavior of CROP Participants in Alabama.” Journal of Agribusiness 17(1999):149–60.Google Scholar
Pannell, D.J., Marshall, G.R., Barr, N., Curtis, A., Vanclay, F., and Wilkinson, R. “Understanding and Promoting Adoption of Conservation Practices by Rural Landholders.” Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46(2006):1407–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pease, J., Schweikhardt, D., and Seidl, A. “Conservation Provisions of the Food, Conservation and Energy Act of 2008: Evolutionary Changes and Challenges.” Choice (Chicago, III.) 23(2008):36–40.Google Scholar
Roberts, R.K., English, B.C., Larson, J.A., Cochran, R.L., Goodman, W.R., Larkin, S.L., Marra, M.C., Martin, S.W., Shurley, W.D., and Reeves, J.M. “Adoption of Site-Specific Information and Variable Rate Technologies in Cotton Precision Farming.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 36(2004):143–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spanos, A.Probability Theory and Statistical Inference: Econometric Modeling with Observational Data. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Soule, M.J. “Soil Management and the Farm Typology: Do Small Family Farms Manage Soil and Nutrient Resources Differently than Large Family Farms?” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 30(2001):179–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soule, M.J., Tegene, A., and Wiebe, K.D. “Land Tenure and the Adoption of Conservation Practices.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82(2000):993–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Train, K.Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uri, N.D. “Factors Affecting the Use of Conservation Tillage in the United States.” Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 116(1999):621–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Government Accountability Office. Farm Programs: Efforts to Achieve Equitable Treatment of Minority Farmers. Washington, DC: United States General Accounting Office, Letter Report, 01/24/97, GAO/RCED-97-41, 1997.Google Scholar
U.S. House, 110th Congress, 2nd Session. H.R. 6124, Food, Conservation and Energy Act of 2008. May 22, 2008. Internet site: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=hl10-6124 (Accessed January 5, 2009).Google Scholar
Veall, M., and Zimmermann, K. “Pseduo-R2 in the Ordinal Probit Model.” The Journal of Mathematical Sociology 16(1992):333–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodcock, S. C/S£7?/Economics. Cornell University. Ithaca, NY. “Multilogistic Regression Procedures for MATLAB.” Econometrics Toolbox. February 2005. Internet site: http://www.spatial-econometrics.com (Accessed November 30, 2010).Google Scholar
Wu, J.J., and Babcock, B.A. “The Choice of Tillage, Rotation, and Soil Testing Practices: Economic and Environmental Implications.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80(1998):494–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar