Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T19:33:34.901Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pesticide Regulation Issues: Living with the Delaney Clause

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Craig Osteen
Craig Osteen*
Affiliation:
National Agricultural Pesticide Impact Assessment Program (NAPIAP) and Economic Research Service, USDA, Washington, D.C.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pesticide use is regulated within a complex legal framework that includes the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act; the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act; and other environmental laws. The framework includes risk-benefit rules for some decisions that permit full consideration of comparative performance, cost, and risks of a pesticide and its alternatives before decisions to permit or ban uses. The framework also includes risk-only standards, such as the Delaney Clause, that prohibit such comparisons and can have unintended and undesirable consequences by increasing health or environmental risks while increasing the cost of producing agricultural commodities.

Keywords

Delaney Clausefood safetypesticide regulation
Type
Invited Papers and Discussions
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , July 1994 , pp. 60 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ames, B.N., “Pesticide Residues and Cancer Causation,” In Carcinogenicity and Pesticides: Principles, Issues, and Relationships, ed. Ragsdale, N.N. and Menzer, R.E.. ACS Symposium Series 414, Washington, D.C: American Chemical Society, 1989, pp. 223–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridges, D.C., Kvien, C. K., Hook, J. E., and Stark, C. R., “An Analysis of the Use and Benefits of Pesticides in U.S.-Grown Peanuts,” University of Georgia, Unpublished Draft, 1994.Google Scholar
Browner, C.M., Rominger, R., and Kessler, D., Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Department Operations and Nutrition, Committee on Agriculture, U.S. House. of Representatives, Sept. 22, 1993.Google Scholar
Ferguson, W., Moffitt, L. J., and Davis, M., “Short-Run Welfare Implications of Restricting Fungicide Use in Vegetable Production,” J. Agribusiness 10(1992): 41–50.Google Scholar
Kuchler, F., and Ralston, K., “Impacts of Delaney Clause Ruling,” Agricultural Outlook, AO-196, May 1993, pp. 29–32.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J., “In Re: ‘Request for Comment on Petition to Modify EPA Policy on Pesticide Tolerances,’ Comments of the National Agricultural Chemical Association,” Washington, D.C, April 30, 1993.Google Scholar
National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, Board on Agriculture, Regulating Pesticides in Food: The Delaney Paradox, Washington, D.C: National Academy Press, 1987.Google Scholar
National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, Board on Agriculture, Pesticides in the Diets of Infants and Children, Washington, D.C: National Academy Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Osteen, C., “Pesticide Use Trends and Issues in the U.S.” in The Pesticide Question: Environment, Economics, and Ethics, ed. Pimentel, D. and Lehman, H.. New York: Chapman and Hall Press, 1993, pp. 307–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osteen, C., and Kuchler, F., Potential Bans of Corn and Soybean Pesticides: Economic Implications for Farmers and Consumers. Washington, D.C: U.S. Dept. of Agr., Econ. Res. Serv. AER No. 546, 23 pp., Apr. 1986.Google Scholar
USDA, National Agricultural Pesticide Impact Assessment Program, The Biologic and Economic Assessment of Chlorpyrifos, Draft, 1994.Google Scholar
USDA, National Agricultural Pesticide Impact Assessment Program, The Biologic and Economic Assessment of Methyl Bromide, April 1993, 99 pp.Google Scholar
USDA, National Agricultural Pesticide Impact Assessment Program, The Biologic and Economic Assessment of Propargite, Draft, 1994.Google Scholar
USDA, National Agricultural Pesticide Impact Assessment Program, The Importance of Fungicides in U.S. Leafy Green Production, Draft, 1994.Google Scholar
USDA, National Agricultural Pesticide Impact Assessment Program, The Importance of Pesticides and Other Pest Management Practices in U.S. Cotton. Production, NAPIAP Report No. 1-CA-93, June 1993, 265 pp.Google Scholar
USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service, Agricultural Chemical Usage, 1992 Fruits and Nuts Summary, Ag Ch 1(92), June 1992.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, Status of Pesticides in Reregistration and Special Review, 700-R-92-004, May 1992.Google Scholar
U.S. General Accounting Office, Pesticides: A Comparative Study of Industrialized Nations' Regulatory Systems. GAO/PEMD-93-17, July 1993, 104 pp.Google Scholar