Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T23:37:01.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Combined mineral N and organic waste fertilization – effects on crop growth and soil properties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2013

M. ODLARE ,
M. PELL ,
J. V. ARTHURSON ,
J. ABUBAKER  and
E. NEHRENHEIM
M. ODLARE*
Affiliation:
School of Sustainable Development of Society and Technology, Mälardalen University, Box 883, SE-721 23 Västerås, Sweden
M. PELL
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7025, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
J. V. ARTHURSON
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7025, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
J. ABUBAKER
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7025, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
E. NEHRENHEIM
Affiliation:
School of Sustainable Development of Society and Technology, Mälardalen University, Box 883, SE-721 23 Västerås, Sweden
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: monica.odlare@mdh.se
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

An 8-year-long field experiment (1998–2006) was established in Sweden with the aim of evaluating the effects of applying organic wastes in combination with mineral nitrogen (N) to agricultural soil. Sewage sludge (SS), biogas residues (BR) and municipal compost (CO) were applied annually at rates corresponding to 50 kg N/ha and supplementary mineral N fertilizer also applied at rates corresponding to 50 kg N/ha. The effects were evaluated by analysing crop yield and soil chemical and microbiological properties. The results showed that none of the fertilizers produced significantly higher yield of barley over the 8-year period compared to any other. Biogas residue proved to be particularly beneficial for the substrate-induced respiration (SIR) in soil and increased the proportion of active to dormant micro-organisms. Treatment with SS increased plant-available phosphorus (P-AL) and N mineralization (N-min), whereas CO increased the basal respiration (B-resp). Changes in the microbial community structure were assayed by terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP); the T-RFLP signatures of the soil bacterial community were largely unaffected by the addition of organic waste. Of the chemical properties assayed, the largest increases were seen in P-AL, where SS produced the highest value. Treatments with the organic wastes showed no negative effects other than a slight decrease in B-resp induced by SS and BR. In conclusion, the microbiological activity in the soil responded more rapidly than the changes in the community structure and the chemical properties to changes in the soil environment.

Type
Crops and Soils Research Papers
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 152 , Issue 1 , February 2014 , pp. 134 - 145
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aparicio, I., Santos, J. L. & Alonso, E. (2009). Limitation of the concentration of organic pollutants in sewage sludge for agricultural purposes: a case study in South Spain. Waste Management 29, 1747–1753.Google Scholar
Arthurson, V. (2009). Closing the global energy and nutrient cycles through application of biogas residue to agricultural land – potential benefits and drawback. Energies 2, 226–242.Google Scholar
Bañuelos, G. S., Sharmasarkar, S. & Pasakdee, S. (2004). Utilization of biosolids as a fertilizer for canola. Compost Science and Utilization 12, 61–68.Google Scholar
Belser, L. W. & Mays, E. L. (1980). Specific inhibition of nitrite oxidation by chlorate and its use in assessing nitrification in soils and sediments. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 39, 505–510.Google Scholar
Bremner, J. M. & Mulvaney, C. S. (1982). Nitrogen – total. In Methods of Soil Analysis (Eds Page, A. L., Miller, R. H. & Keeney, R. D.), pp. 595–624. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Cherif, H., Ayari, F., Ouzari, H., Marzorati, M., Brusetti, L., Jedidi, N., Hassen, A. & Daffonchio, D. (2009). Effects of municipal solid waste compost, farmyard manure and chemical fertilizers on wheat growth, soil composition and soil bacterial characteristics under Tunisian arid climate. European Journal of Soil Biology 45, 138–145.Google Scholar
Debosz, K., Petersen, S. O., Kure, L. K. & Ambus, P. (2002). Evaluation effects of sewage sludge and household compost on soil physical, chemical and microbiological properties. Applied Soil Ecology 19, 237–248.Google Scholar
De Cantanzaro, J. B. & Beauchamp, E. G. (1985). The effect of some substrates on denitrification rates and carbon utilization in soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils 1, 183–187.Google Scholar
Dick, R. P. (1992). A review: long-term effects of agricultural systems on soil biochemical and microbial parameters. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 40, 25–36.Google Scholar
Egnér, H., Riehm, H. & Domingo, W. R. (1960). Untersuchungen über die chemische Bodenanalyse als Grundlage für die Beurteilung des Nährstoffzustandes der Böden. Chemische Extractionsmethoden zur Phosphor- und Kaliumbestimmung. Kungliga Lantbrukshögskolans Annaler 26, 199–215.Google Scholar
FAO (1998). Soil Map of the World. World Soil Resources Report 60. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Habteselassie, M. Y., Miller, B. E., Thacker, S. G., Stark, J. M. & Norton, J. M. (2006). Soil nitrogen and nutrient dynamics after repeated application of treated dairy-waste. Soil Science Society of America Journal 70, 1328–1337.Google Scholar
ISO 15685 (2012). Soil Quality – Determination of Potential Nitrification and Inhibition of Nitrification – Rapid test by Ammonium Oxidation. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.Google Scholar
Jakobsen, S. T. (1995). Aerobic decomposition of organic wastes. 2. Value of compost as a fertilizer. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 13, 57–71.Google Scholar
Janssen, B. H. (1996). Nitrogen mineralization in relation to C:N ratio and decomposability of organic materials. Plant and Soil 181, 39–45.Google Scholar
Khan, M. & Scullion, J. (1999). Microbial activity in grassland soil amended with sewage sludge containing varying rates and combinations of Cu, Ni and Zn. Biology and Fertility of Soils 30, 202–209.Google Scholar
Kaur, T., Brar, B. S. & Dhillon, N. S. (2008). Soil organic matter dynamics as affected by long-term use of organic and inorganic fertilizers under maize-wheat cropping system. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 81, 59–69.Google Scholar
Kaye, J. P. & Hart, S. C. (1997). Competition for nitrogen between plants and soil microorganisms. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12, 139–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kowalchuk, G. A. & Stephen, J. R. (2001). Ammonia-oxidizing bacteria: a model for molecular microbial ecology. Annual Review of Microbiology 55, 485–529.Google Scholar
Liu, W. T., Marsh, T. L., Cheng, H. & Forney, L. J. (1997). Characterization of microbial diversity by determining terminal restriction fragment length polymorphisms of genes encoding 16S rRNA. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 63, 4516–4522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mantovi, P., Baldoni, G. & Toderi, G. (2005). Reuse of liquid, dewatered, and composted sewage sludge on agricultural land: effects of long-term application on soil and crop. Water Resources 39, 289–296.Google Scholar
Masto, R. E., Chhonkar, P. K., Singh, D. & Patra, A. K. (2006). Changes in soil biological and biochemical characteristics in a long-term field trial on a sub-tropical inceptisol. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 38, 1577–1582.Google Scholar
Miller, D. M. & Miller, W. P. (2000). Land application of wastes. In Handbook of Soil Science. Section G: Interdisciplinary Aspects of Soil Science (Ed. Sumner, M.), pp. G217–G246. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Montemurro, F., Maiorana, M., Convertini, G. & Ferri, D. (2006). Compost organic amendments in fodder crops: effects on yield, nitrogen utilization and soil characteristics. Compost Science and Utilization 14, 114–123.Google Scholar
Montemurro, F., Canali, S., Convertini, G., Ferri, D., Tittarelli, F. & Vitti, C. (2008). Anaerobic digestates application on fodder crops: effects on plant and soil. Agrochimica 52, 297–312.Google Scholar
Moreno, J. L., Hernández, T., Perez, A. & Garcia, C. (2002). Toxicity of cadmium to soil microbial activity: effect of sewage sludge addition to soil on the ecological dose. Applied Soil Ecology 21, 149–158.Google Scholar
Nordgren, A. (1992). A method for determining microbially available N and P in an organic soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils 13, 195–199.Google Scholar
Nyberg, K., Sundh, I., Johansson, M. & Schnürer, A. (2004). Presence of potential ammonia oxidation (PAO) inhibiting substances in anaerobic digestion residues. Applied Soil Ecology 26, 107–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odlare, M., Svensson, K. & Pell, M. (2005). Near infrared reflectance spectroscopy for assessment of spatial soil variation in an agricultural field. Geoderma 126, 193–202.Google Scholar
Odlare, M., Pell, M. & Svensson, K. (2008). Changes in soil chemical and microbiological properties during 4 years of application of various organic residues. Waste Management 28, 1246–1253.Google Scholar
Pell, M., Stenberg, B., Stenström, J. & Torstensson, L. (1996). Potential denitrification activity assay in soil – with or without chloramphenicol? Soil Biology and Biochemistry 28, 393–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roldán, A., Salinas-García, J. R., Alguacil, M. M., Díaz, E. & Caravaca, F. (2005). Soil enzyme activities suggest advantages of conservation tillage practices in sorghum cultivation under subtropical conditions. Geoderma 129, 178–185.Google Scholar
Ros, M., Klammer, S., Knapp, B., Aichberger, K. & Insam, H. (2006). Long-term effects of compost amendment of soil on functional and structural diversity and microbial activity. Soil Use and Management 22, 209–218.Google Scholar
Saviozzi, A., Biasci, A., Riffaldi, R. & Levi-Minzi, R. (1999). Long-term effects of farmyard manure and sewage sludge on some soil biochemical characteristics. Biology and Fertility of Soils 30, 100–106.Google Scholar
Siddique, M. T. & Robinson, J. S. (2003). Phosphorus sorption and availability in soils amended with animal manures and sewage sludge. Journal of Environmental Quality 32, 1114–1121.Google Scholar
Singh, R. P. & Agrawal, M. (2010). Effect of different sewage sludge applications on growth and yield of Vigna radiata L. field crop: metal uptake by plant. Ecological Engineering 36, 969–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SIS (1997). Soil Analysis – Determination of Trace Elements in Soil – Extraction with Nitric Acids. SS 28311. Stockholm: Swedish Standards Institute.Google Scholar
Stenberg, B., Johansson, M., Pell, M., Sjödahl-Svensson, K., Stenström, J. & Torstensson, L. (1998). Microbial biomass and activities in soil as affected by frozen and cold storage. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 30, 393–402.Google Scholar
Stenström, J., Hansen, A. & Svensson, B. (1991). Kinetics of microbial growth associated product formation. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 21, 55–62.Google Scholar
Stenström, J., Svensson, K. & Johansson, M. (2001). Reversible transition between active and dormant microbial states in soil. FEMS Microbiology and Ecology 36, 93–104.Google Scholar
Svensson, K., Odlare, M. & Pell, M. (2004). The fertilizing effect of compost and biogas residues from source separated household waste. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 142, 461–467.Google Scholar
Tennakoon, N. A. & Hemapala Bandara, S. D. (2003). Nutrient content of some locally available organic materials and their potential as alternative sources of nutrients for coconut. COCOS 15, 23–30.Google Scholar
Torstensson, L. (1993). Soil Biological Variables in Environmental Hazard Assessment: Guidelines. Swedish EPA Report No. 4262. Stockholm: Swedish Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
Tyson, R. V., Simonne, E. H., Davis, M., Lamb, E. M., White, J. M. & Treadwell, D. D. (2007). Effect of nutrient solution, nitrate–nitrogen concentration, and pH on nitrification rate in perlite medium. Journal of Plant Nutrition 30, 901–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valé, M., Nguyen, C., Dambrine, E. & Dupouey, J. L. (2005). Microbial activity in the rhizosphere soil of six herbaceous species cultivated in a greenhouse is correlated with shoot biomass and root C concentrations. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 37, 2329–2333.Google Scholar
Waring, S. A. & Bremner, J. M. (1964). Ammonium production in soil under waterlogged conditions as an index of nitrogen availability. Nature 201, 951–952.Google Scholar
Warman, P. R. & Termeer, W. C. (2005). Evaluation of sewage sludge, septic waste and sludge compost applications to corn and forage: yields and N, P and K content of crops and soils. Bioresource Technology 96, 955–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wienhold, B. J., Andrews, S. S. & Karlen, D. L. (2004). Soil quality: a review of the science and experiences in the USA. Environmental Geochemistry and Health 26, 89–95.Google Scholar