Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T16:21:41.718Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative response of groundnut and wheat to phosphorus in a groundnut–wheat rotation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

N. S. Pasricha ,
M. S. Aulakh ,
N. S. Sahota  and
H. S. Baddesha
N. S. Pasricha
Affiliation:
Department of Soils, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India
M. S. Aulakh
Affiliation:
Department of Soils, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India
N. S. Sahota
Affiliation:
Department of Soils, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India
H. S. Baddesha
Affiliation:
Department of Soils, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Pod yield of groundnut and grain yield of wheat grown in that sequence was compared as affected by date of sowing and response to direct, residual and cumulative P application over 3 years in a field experiment. Total yield of groundnut and wheat was higher when groundnut was sown on 22 June and the following wheat on 1 November than when groundnut was sown on 6 July, followed by wheat sown on 16 November. Limited P requirement of groundnut was indicated by the small and inconsistent response to applied P on soil low in available P. Wheat responded to the second increment of P and direct application to wheat proved more effective than residual effects of previous application. Differential response of wheat to direct and residual P application in the groundnut-wheat cropping sequence indicates that P applications are more effective for wheat than groundnut, and groundnut can grow well on the residual P that remained in the soil.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 94 , Issue 3 , June 1980 , pp. 691 - 696
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Goudreddy, B. S., Yandagouder, B. A. & Sindagi, S. S. (1973). Soil and foliar application of phosphorus fertilizer to rainfed groundnut. Indian Journal of Agronomy 18, 260–263.Google Scholar
Joshi, M. S., Hedge, D. M. & Sanjeewaiah, B. S. (1975). Response of groundnut to levels and methods of application of phosphorus. Oilseed Journal 5, 8–10.Google Scholar
Kalra, V. P. & Soper, R. J. (1968). Efficiency of rape, oats, soybean and flax in absorbing soil and fertilizer phosphorus at seven stages of growth. Agronomy Journal 60, 209–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamprath, E. J., Nelson, W. L. & Fitts, J. W. (1957). Sulphur removed from soil by field crops. Agronomy Journal 49, 289–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prasad, R. & Govil, B. P. (1974). Residual effect of phosphate applied to sorghum on the succeeding crop of wheat. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 44, 106–s110.Google Scholar
Saini, J. S. & Tripathi, H. P. (1975). Effect of phosphorus on different varieties of groundnut. Journal of Research, Punjab Agricultural University 12, 355–358.Google Scholar
Sharma, V. & Patil, R. V. (1971). Residual effect of sorghum and maize fertilization on succeeding crop of groundnut. Journal of Indian Society of Soil Science 19, 313–316.Google Scholar
Singh, B. P., Singh, B. B. & Yadav, T. P. (1974). Effect of time and method of application of phosphorus in groundnut. Journal of Research, Haryana Agricultural University 4, 204–207.Google Scholar