Hostname: page-component-669899f699-7tmb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-26T11:55:23.679Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The determination of clay in heavy soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. F. Joseph  and
F. J. Martin
A. F. Joseph
Affiliation:
Wellcome Tropical Research Laboratories, Khartoum.
F. J. Martin
Affiliation:
Wellcome Tropical Research Laboratories, Khartoum.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The Sudan method for clay determination worked out by Dr Beam in 1911 has been critically examined and compared with the methods in general use in England and America.

2. The essential points of the method lie in (a) the use of sodium carbonate instead of ammonia as the deflocculating agent, and (b) the use of a camel-hair brush for puddling the clay. It differs from the English (and resembles the American) method in that no preliminary acid treatment is used, the height of the sedimentation column is 10 cms. and the time of subsidence 8 hours.

3. It can be applied to a sedimentation or centrifugal process: the results agree well with each other and with those obtained by the American method.

4. When modified by inclusion of acid treatment, by increasing the time of sedimentation from 8 to 24 hours and reducing the height of the column to 8·6 cms., the results agree well with those obtained by the English method.

5. Treatment with acid either in the preliminary operations or for deflocculating clay suspensions may lead to uncertainty in the results in some cases as it causes loss of “clay” by solution.

6. The Sudan sedimentation method can be carried out in about one-eighth the time required for the English method, and the centrifugal in about one-third the time required for the American. For general use the sedimentation method is preferred as requiring less attention.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , July 1921 , pp. 293 - 303
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1921

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Page 296 Note 1 Beam states that this preliminary shaking may be replaced by puddling with a camel-hair brush with a little sodium carbonate solution.

Page 297 Note 1 The shaker referred to in U. S. Bulletin No. 84 is prescribed to run at a speed of 100 shakes per minute: as our machine only runs at 65 per minute, we have increased the time of shaking in proportion where necessary.