Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T14:35:30.299Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Digestible cell wall and undigested cellular contents of two grasses of low net energy value for growing cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

K. W. Moir
K. W. Moir
Affiliation:
Queensland Department of Primary Industries, Animal Research Institute, Yeerongpilly, Brisbane 4105, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

SUMMARY

In two grasses of low net energy value for growth and fattening of cattle, digestible cell-wall values were close to 40% of forage organic matter (OM), similar to the expected value for grass. A value of 14% of forage OM for apparently undigested cellular contents in both grasses was just outside the range of values for grass. The data supported previous evidence that total cell wall is the only value that can be used at present to define grass in terms of its digestible dry matter.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 99 , Issue 1 , August 1982 , pp. 207 - 208
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

McDonald, I. W. (1948). The absorption of ammonia from the rumen of sheep. Biochemical Journal 42, 584–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, I. W. (1952). The role of ammonia in ruminal digestion of protein. Biochemical Journal 51, 86–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mason, V. C. (1971). Some preliminary observations on the nature of factors influencing the excretion of nondietary faecal nitrogen by ruminant animals. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 76, 157–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moir, K. W. (1971). In vivoand in vitrodigestible fractions in forage. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 22, 338–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moir, K. W. (1972 a). The effect of different extraction procedures on the recovery of cell walls in forage and faeces from cattle and sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 78, 351–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moir, K. W. (1972 b). An assessment of the quality of forage from its cell-wall content and amount of cell wall digested. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 78, 355–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moir, K. W. (1974). The estimation of the metabolizable energy of forage from its cell-wall content and digestible cell wall. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 82, 423–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mora, K. W., Laws, L. & Blight, G. (1975). The relative importance of the total cell wall and quantity of digested cell wall in the regulation of the voluntary intake of grass hays by sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 85, 39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tudor, G. D. & Minson, D. J. (1982). The utilization of the dietary energy of pangola and setaria by young growing beef cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 98, 395–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. & Moore, L. A. (1965). New chemical methods for analysis of forage for predicting nutritive value. Proceedings of the 9th International Grasslands Congress, pp. 785–789.Google Scholar