Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:19:34.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The digestion of untreated and formaldehyde-treated soya-bean and rapeseed meals by cattle fed a basal silage diet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. A. Rooke ,
I. M. Brookes  and
D. G. Armstrong
J. A. Rooke
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Biochemistry and Nutrition, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, NEl 7RU
I. M. Brookes
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Biochemistry and Nutrition, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, NEl 7RU
D. G. Armstrong
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Biochemistry and Nutrition, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, NEl 7RU
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effect of pretreating soya-bean and rapeseed meals with formaldehyde was studied. Soya-bean and rapeseed meals, both untreated and formaldehyde-treated, were fed to cattle receiving a basal diet of silage in a 4 × 4 latin square. Formaldehyde treatment of both meals significantly reduced apparent N digestibility. All four protein supplements increased the amounts of non-ammonia N and amino acid N entering the small intestine over those obtained when silage was fed alone. Formaldehyde treatment of the meals increased the amounts of non-ammonia N and amino acid N entering the small intestine; this effect was significant, however, for only the formaldehyde treatment of the soya-bean meal. The low efficiency of microbial N synthesis observed when silage was fed alone was increased by the inclusion of both of the soyabean meals in the diet but not by the inclusion of the rapeseed meals. Formaldehyde treatment reduced the apparent degradability of the soya-bean meal N, determined in vivo, from 0·90 for the untreated meal to 0·40 for the formaldehyde-treated meal; similarly the degradability of the untreated rapeseed meal was reduced from 0·77 to 0·41 by the formaldehyde treatment. The in sacco technique gave values for degradability for the protein supplements which ranked them in a similar manner as did the in vivo technique; however, for any one meal the in sacco value for degradability was lower than that determined in vivo.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 100 , Issue 2 , April 1983 , pp. 329 - 342
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, S. A. & Miller, E. L. (1976). Determination of nitrogen requirement for microbial growth from the effect of urea supplementation of a low N diet on abomasal N flow and N recycling in wethers and lambs. British Journal of Nutrition 36, 353–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, D. G. (1980). New efficiencies (in vivo) of microbial N synthesis in ruminant livestock. Proceedings of the 3rd EAAP-Symposium on Protein Metabolism and Nutrition (ed. Oslage, H. J. and Rohr, K.), pp. 400–413. Braunschweig: Information-Centre of Bundesforschungsanstalt für Landwirtschaft.Google Scholar
Burgess, P. L. & Nicholson, J. W. G. (1973). Formaldehyde treatment of rapeseed meal for lactating dairy cows. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 53, 765–766.Google Scholar
Corbett, J. L., Greenhalgh, J. F. D., McDonald, I. & Florence, E. (1960). Excretion of chromium sosquioxide administered as a component of paper to sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 14, 289–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cottyn, B. G. & Boucque, C. V. (1968). Rapid method for the gas-chromatographie determination of volatile fatty acids in rumen fluid. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 16, 105–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demeyer, D. I. & Van Nevel, C. J. (1980). Nitrogen exchanges in the rumen. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 39, 89–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deriaz, R. E. (1961). Routine analysis of carbohydrates and lignin in herbage. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 12, 152–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewar, W. A. & McDonald, P. (1961). Determination of dry matter in silage by distillation with toluene. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 12, 790–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, R. & Armstrong, D. G. (1982). The effect of urea and urea plus sodium sulphate on microbial protein production in the rumens of sheep given diets high in alkali-treated barley straw. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 99, 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, E. (1981). An evaluation of the relationship between dietary parameters and rumen solid turnover rate. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 61, 97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, L. J. & Walsh, D. S. (1976). Substitution of rapeseed meal for soybean meal as a source of protein for lactating cows. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 56, 233–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganev, G., Ørskov, E. R. & Smart, R. (1979). The effect of roughage or concentrate feeding and rumen retention time on total degradation of protein in the rumen. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 93, 651–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, D. W. & Kay, J. J. (1976). Determination of volatile fatty acids, C1-C6, and lactic acid in silage juice. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 27, 1005–1014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, P. M., Christophersen, R. J. & Milligan, L. P. (1982). Effects of cold exposure on feed protein degradation, microbial protein synthesis and transfer of plasma urea to the rumen of sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 47, 521–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laarveld, B., Brockman, R. P. & Christensen, D. A. (1981). The effects of Tower and Midas rapeseed meals on milk production and concentration of goitrogens and iodide in milk. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 61, 131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindell, L. & Knutsson, P.-G. (1976). Rapeseed meal in rations for dairy cows. 1. Comparison of three levels of rapeseed meal. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Science 6, 55–63.Google Scholar
McMeniman, N. P. & Armstrong, D. G. (1979). The flow of amino acids into small intestine of cattle when fed heated and unheated beans (Vicia faba). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 93, 181–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahadevan, S., Erfle, J. D. & Sauer, F. D. (1980). Degradation of soluble and insoluble proteins by Bacteroides amylophilus protease and by rumen microorganisms. Journal of Animal Science 50, 723–728.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mathers, J. C. & Miller, E. L. (1980). A simple procedure using MS incorporation for the measurement of microbial and undegraded food protein in ruminant digesta. British Journal of Nutrition 43, 503–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehrez, A. Z. & Ørskov, E. R. (1977). A study of the artificial fibre bag technique for determining the digestibility of feeds in the rumen. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 88, 645–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, E. L. (1980 a). Protein value of feedstuffs for ruminants. In Vicia faba: Feeding Value, Processing and Viruses (ed. Bond, D. A.), pp. 17–30. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Miller, E. L. (1980 b). Protein and amino acid requirements of dairy cows. Proceedings of the 3rd EAAPSymposium on Protein Metabolism and Nutrition (ed. Osage, H. J. and Rohr, K.), pp. 757–776. Braunschweig: Information Centre of Bundesforschungsanstalt für Landwirtschaft.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1975). Energy Allowances and Feeding Systems for Ruminants. Technical Bulletin, no. 33. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Overend, M. A. & Armstrong, D. G. (1982). The digestion of a wilted silage made with and without an additive. Occasional Publication, British Society of Animal Production, no. 6, pp. 162–163.Google Scholar
Papas, A., Ingalls, J. R. & Campbell, L. D. (1979). Studies on the effects of rapeseed meal on thyroid status of cattle, glucosinolate and iodine content of milk and other parameters. Journal of Nutrition 109, 1129–1139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papas, A., Ingalls, J. R. & Cansfield, P. (1978). Effects of Tower and 1821 rapeseed meals and Tower gums on milk yield, milk composition and blood parameters of lactating dairy cows. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 58, 671–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rooke, J. A., Brookes, I. M. & Armstrong, D. G. (1982). Grass silages ensiled with either formic acid or a lactobacillus preparation and their digestion by Jersey cattle. Occasional Publication, British Society of Animal Production, no. 6, pp. 185–186.Google Scholar
Rooke, J. A., Norton, B. W. & Armstrong, D. G. (1982). The digestion of untreated and formaldehydetreated soya-bean meals and estimation of their rumen degradabilities by different methods. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 99, 441–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulz, E. & Petersen, U. (1981). Nutritive value of protein feedingstuffs from oilseed crops. In Production and Utilization of Protein in Oilseed Crops (ed. Bunting, D. S.), pp. 243–263. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, H. R. & Ingalls, J. R. (1973). Comparative value of soybean, rapeseed and formaldehydetreated rapeseod meals in urea-containing calf rations. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 53, 273–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, H. R., Ingalls, J. R. & Devlin, T. J. (1980). Apparent digestibility of Tower and Candle rapeseed meals by Holstein bull calves. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 60, 915–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, H. R., Ingalls, J. R. & McKirdy, J. A. (1972). Nutritive value of formaldehyde-treated rapeseed meal for dairy calves. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 52, 363–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, H. R., Ingalls, J. R. & McKirdy, J. A. (1977). Effects of feeding a high level of Tower rape-seed meal in dairy rations on feed intake and milk production. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 57, 653–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teather, R. M., Erfle, J. D., Boila, R. J. & Sauer, F. D. (1980). Effect of dietary nitrogen on the rumen microbial population in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 49, 231–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teller, E., Godeau, J.-M. & De Baere, R. (1979). Urea and the fate of dietary nitrogen in the rumen. Annales de Recherches Vétérinaires 10, 451–453.Google ScholarPubMed
Thomas, T. A. (1977). An automated procedure for the determination of soluble carbohydrates in silage. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 28, 639–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, J. M. A. & Terry, R. A. (1963). A two-stage technique for in vitro digestion of forage crops. British Journal of Grassland Science 18, 104–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tukey, J. W. (1949). Comparing individual means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics 5, 99–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vérité, R. & Journet, M. (1977). Utilisation des tourteaux traités au formol par les vaches laitières. 11. Effets sur la production laitière du traitement des tourteaux et du niveau d'apport azotè au dèbut de la lactation. Annales de Zootechnie 26, 183–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wachira, J. D., Satter, L. D., Brooke, G. P. & Pope, A. L. (1974). Evaluation of formaldehyde-treated protein for growing lambs and lactating cows. Journal of Animal Science 39, 796–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldern, D. E. (1973). Rapeseed meal versus soybean meal as the only protein supplement for lactating cows fed corn silage: roughage rations. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 53, 107–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, C. J., David, D. J. & Iismaa, O. (1962). Determination of chromic oxide in faeces samples by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 59, 381–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zar, J. H. (1974). Biostatistical Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar