Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:36:18.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of daily movement of dairy cattle to fresh grass in morning or afternoon on intake, grazing behaviour, rumen fermentation and milk production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2009

P. A. ABRAHAMSE ,
S. TAMMINGA  and
J. DIJKSTRA
P. A. ABRAHAMSE*
Affiliation:
Animal Nutrition Group, Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
S. TAMMINGA
Affiliation:
Animal Nutrition Group, Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
J. DIJKSTRA
Affiliation:
Animal Nutrition Group, Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed: Email: sander.abrahamse@wur.nl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Twenty Holstein cows were split into two equal groups to test the effect of daily move to a previously ungrazed strip after morning milking (MA) or afternoon milking (AA) on herbage intake, grazing behaviour, rumen characteristics and milk production using a randomized block design with three periods of 14 days each. Milking took place at 06.00 and 16.00 h. The chemical composition of grass was similar between treatments, but an interaction between treatment and time of sampling was found in all variables except acid detergent lignin (ADL). The most pronounced differences existed in sugar content. Grass sugar content was greatest following afternoon milking. However, the difference in sugar content in grass was much larger in MA (158 v 114 g/kg dry matter (DM) at 16.00 and 06.00 h, respectively) than in AA (147 v 129 g/kg DM at 16.00 and 06.00 h, respectively). Neutral detergent fibre (NDF) was significantly higher at 06.00 h than at 16.00 h (469 v 425 g/kg DM) in AA, but was equal between morning and afternoon in MA (453 g/kg DM). Herbage intake, determined using the n-alkane technique, did not differ between treatments. Grazing behaviour observed using IGER graze recorders were similar between treatments, except for ruminating time, bite rate and the number of ruminations and boli per period of the day. However, interactions between treatment and time in grazing behaviour variables were found. Grazing time was longer and number of bites was greater following allocation to a new plot (after milking in the morning in MA or milking in the afternoon in AA) when compared to allocation to the same plot after the subsequent milking per treatment (after milking in the afternoon or morning in MA and AA, respectively). In comparison to AA, grazing time in MA was more evenly distributed during the day but lower during the night. The combined effects of differences in grazing behaviour and chemical composition of the grass between treatments in different periods of the day probably caused higher intake of sugars in AA, resulting in a significantly higher non-glucogenic to glucogenic volatile fatty acid ratio (NGR) in the rumen in AA than MA. Milk fat content was lower in MA than AA, but milk production and milk protein and lactose content did not differ. In conclusion, time of allocation to a fresh plot altered the distribution of grazing behaviour variables over the day, and affected NGR and milk fat content, but herbage intake and milk production were not changed.

Type
Animals
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 147 , Issue 6 , December 2009 , pp. 721 - 730
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abrahamse, P. A., Dijkstra, J., Vlaeminck, B. & Tamminga, S. (2008). Frequent allocation of rotationally grazed dairy cows changes grazing behavior and improves productivity. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 2033–2045.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bannink, A., Kogut, J., Dijkstra, J., France, J., Kebreab, E., Van Vuuren, A. M. & Tamminga, S. (2006). Estimation of the stoichiometry of volatile fatty acid production in the rumen of lactating cows. Journal of Theoretical Biology 238, 36–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bargo, F., Muller, L. D., Kolver, E. S. & Delahoy, J. E. (2003). Invited review: production and digestion of supplemented dairy cows on pasture. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 1–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boudon, A., Peyraud, J. L. & Faverdin, P. (2002). The release of cell contents of fresh rye-grass (Lolium perenne L.) during digestion in dairy cows: effect of the intracellular constituents, season and stage of maturity. Animal Feed Science and Technology 97, 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilibroste, P. (2005). Pasture characteristics and animal performance. In Quantitative Aspects of Ruminant Digestion and Metabolism, 2nd edn. (Eds Dijkstra, J., Forbes, J. M. & France, J.), pp. 681–706. Wallingford, UK: CABI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delagarde, R., Peyraud, J. L., Delaby, L. & Faverdin, P. (2000). Vertical distribution of biomass, chemical composition and pepsin-cellulase digestibility in a perennial ryegrass sward: interaction with month of year, regrowth age and time of day. Animal Feed Science and Technology 84, 49–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulkerson, W. J. & Donaghy, D. J. (2001). Plant-soluble carbohydrate reserves and senescence – key criteria for developing an effective grazing management system for ryegrass-based pastures: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 41, 261–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibb, M. J. (2006). Grassland management with emphasis on grazing behaviour. In Fresh Herbage for Dairy Cattle (Eds Elgersma, A., Dijkstra, J. & Tamminga, S.), pp. 141–157. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibb, M. J., Huckle, C. A. & Nuthall, R. (1998). Effect of time of day on grazing behaviour by lactating dairy cows. Grass and Forage Science 53, 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregorini, P., Eirin, M., Refi, R., Ursino, M., Ansin, O. E. & Gunter, S. A. (2006). Timing of herbage allocation in strip grazing: effects on grazing pattern and performance of beef heifers. Journal of Animal Science 84, 1943–1950.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregorini, P., Gunter, S. A. & Beck, P. A. (2008). Matching plant and animal processes to alter nutrient supply in strip-grazed cattle: timing of herbage and fasting allocation. Journal of Animal Science 86, 1006–1020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gustafsson, A. H. & Palmquist, D. L. (1993). Diurnal variation of rumen ammonia, serum urea, and milk urea in dairy cows at high and low yields. Journal of Dairy Science 76, 475–484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Littell, R. C., Henry, P. R. & Ammerman, C. B. (1998). Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS procedures. Journal of Animal Science 76, 1216–1231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, L. A., Moorby, J. M., Davies, D. R., Humphreys, M. O., Scollan, N. D., Macrae, J. C. & Theodorou, M. K. (2001). Increased concentration of water-soluble carbohydrate in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.): milk production from late-lactation dairy cows. Grass and Forage Science 56, 383–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorby, J. M., Evans, R. T., Scollan, N. D., Macrae, J. C. & Theodorou, M. K. (2006). Increased concentration of water-soluble carbohydrate in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Evaluation in dairy cows in early lactation. Grass and Forage Science 61, 52–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orr, R. J., Rutter, S. M., Penning, P. D. & Rook, A. J. (2001). Matching grass supply to grazing patterns for dairy cows. Grass and Forage Science 56, 352–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penning, P. D., Rook, A. J. & Orr, R. J. (1991). Patterns of ingestive behaviour of sheep continuously stocked on monocultures of ryegrass or white clover. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 31, 237–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rearte, D. H. (2005). New insights in the nutritive value of grass. In Utilisation of Grazed Grass in Temperate Animal Systems. Proceedings of a Satellite Workshop of the XXth International Grassland Congress (Ed. Murphy, J. J.), pp. 49–59. Ireland: Cork.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rook, A. J. & Huckle, C. A. (1997). Activity bout criteria for grazing dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 54, 89–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rook, A. J., Huckle, C. A. & Penning, P. D. (1994). Effects of sward height and concentrate supplementation on the ingestive behaviour of spring-calving dairy cows grazing grass-clover swards. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 40, 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutter, S. M. (2000). Graze: a program to analyze recordings of the jaw movements of ruminants. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 32, 86–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutter, S. M., Champion, R. A. & Penning, P. D. (1997). An automatic system to record foraging behaviour in free-ranging ruminants. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 54, 185–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smit, H. J. & Elgersma, A. (2004). Diurnal fluctuations in vertical distribution of chemical composition in a perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) sward during the season. In Land Use Systems in Grassland Dominated Regions. Proceedings of the 20th General Meeting of the European Grassland Federation (Eds Luscher, A., Jeangros, B., Kessler, W., Huguenin, O., Lobsiger, M., Millar, N. & Suter, D.), pp. 951–953. Switzerland: Luzern.Google Scholar
Smit, H. J., Tamminga, S. & Elgersma, A. (2006). Dairy cattle grazing preference among six cultivars of perennial ryegrass. Agronomy Journal 98, 1213–1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamminga, S., Van Straalen, W. M., Subnel, A. P. J., Meijer, R. G. M., Steg, A., Wever, C. J. G. & Blok, M. C. (1994). The Dutch protein evaluation system: the DVE/OEB-system. Livestock Production Science 40, 139–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tas, B. M., Taweel, H. Z., Smit, H. J., Elgersma, A., Dijkstra, J. & Tamminga, S. (2006 a). Effects of perennial ryegrass cultivars on milk yield and nitrogen utilization in grazing dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 3494–3500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tas, B. M., Taweel, H. Z., Smit, H. J., Elgersma, A., Dijkstra, J. & Tamminga, S. (2006 b). Rumen degradation characteristics of perennial ryegrass cultivars during the growing season. Animal Feed Science and Technology 131, 102–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taweel, H. Z., Tas, B. M., Dijkstra, J. & Tamminga, S. (2004). Intake regulation and grazing behavior of dairy cows under continuous stocking. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 3417–3427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taweel, H. Z., Tas, B. M., Smit, H. J., Elgersma, A., Dijkstra, J. & Tamminga, S. (2005). Effects of feeding perennial ryegrass with an elevated concentration of water-soluble carbohydrates on intake, rumen function and performance of dairy cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology 121, 243–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Es, A. J. H. (1975). Feed evaluation for dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 2, 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Vuuren, A. M., Van Der Koelen, C. J. & Vroons De Bruin, J. (1986). Influence of level and composition of concentrate supplements on rumen fermentation patterns of grazing dairy cows. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 34, 457–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wales, W. J., Stockdale, C. R. & Doyle, P. T. (2005). Plant and sward characteristics to achieve high intake in ruminants. In Utilization of Grazed Grass in Temperate Animal Systems. Proceedings of a Satellite Workshop of the XXth International Grassland Congress (Ed. Murphy, J. J.), pp. 37–47. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar