Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:52:44.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of leaf rust on the growth and chemical composition of oats and ryecorn

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. F. Greenall
A. F. Greenall
Affiliation:
Crop Research Division, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Lincoln, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Leaf-rust infection of severity 3–4 on the modified Cobb scale reduced the dry-matter yield of Dun oat leafage by 30% and N.I.A.B. ryecorn by 23%. The reduction in root growth of ryecorn was similar to that of the aerial parts.

The dry-matter percentage of the green forage was significantly increased in two of the three experiments. Palatability reduction due to leaf rust is suggested from field observations.

With Dun oats leaf-rust infection increased the percentage of crude protein (C.P.) by a fifth, of ash by a tenth and decreased that of crude fibre (C.F.) by an eighth, and of nitrogen-free extract (N.F.E.) by a nineteenth. With ryecorn, rust increased the percentage of c.p. by a fourteenth, of ash by a fifth, and decreased that of N.F.E. by a twentieth.

The decreased forage yield caused by rust is in accord with the results of experiments of other research workers and with field observation. The effect of rust on proximate constituents was interpreted as an improvement to feed value. This agrees with the results of most reported experiments but conflicts with the field evidence.

The hypothesis that leaf rust affects forage composition mainly by reducing the physiological age of cereals is proposed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , February 1958 , pp. 66 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, P. J. (1954). Annu. Rev. Pl. Physiol. 5, 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthur, J. C. (1929). The Plant Rusts. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Axelsson, J. (1952). Ann. R. Coll. Sweden, no. 19, 145.Google Scholar
Bolley, H. L. & Prichard, E. J. (1906). Bull. N.D. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 68.Google Scholar
Butler, K. D. (1940). Abst. Thesis, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Chester, K. S. (1946). The Nature and Prevention of the Cereal Rusts as Exemplified in the Leaf Rust of Wheat. Mass. U.S.A.: Chronica Botanica Co.Google Scholar
Corkill, L. (1956). Proc. Sheepfm Conf., Massey College.Google Scholar
Dimock, A. W. & Baker, K. F. (1951). Phytopathology, 41, 536.Google Scholar
Dodsworth, T. L. (1954). J. Agric. Sci. 44, 383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodsworth, T. L. & Campbell, W. H. (1952). Nature, Lond., 170, 1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Oliviera, B. (1939). Nature, Lond., 144, 480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farkas, G. L. & Kiraly, Z. (1955). Physiol. plant. 8, 877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gassner, G. & Franke, W. (1938). Phytopath. Z. 11, 517.Google Scholar
Hays, H. K., Aamodt, O. S. & Stevenson, F. J. (1927). J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 19, 896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johns, A. T. (1956). Proc. 7th Int. Grassl. Congr.Google Scholar
Johnston, C. O. & Miller, E. C. (1934). J. Agric. Res. 49, 955.Google Scholar
Murphy, H. C. (1935). J. Agric. Res. 50, 387.Google Scholar
Murphy, H. C. (1936). Phytopathology, 26, 220.Google Scholar
Murphy, H. C. (1939). Phytopathology, 29, 763.Google Scholar
Peturson, B. & Newton, M. (1939). Canad. J. Res. C, 17, 380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, H. R., Weetman, L. M. & McClelland, C. K. (1942). Bull. Ark. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 418.Google Scholar
Sjollema, B. (1950). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 5, 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, J. T. & Chilton, J. P. (1941). Phytopathology, 31, 554.Google Scholar
't Hart, M. L. (1956). Proc. 7th Int. Grassl. Congr.Google Scholar
Walker, D. M. & Hepburn, W. R. (1955). J. Agric. Sci. 45, 298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, D. M. & Hepburn, W. R. (1956). J. Agric. Sci. 47, 172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, (1953). Vet. Bull., Weybridge, 24, 1595.Google Scholar
Yarwood, C. E. (1950). Phytopathology, 40, 971.Google Scholar
Yarwood, C. E. (1951). Science, 114, 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yarwood, C. E., Hall, Alice & Nelson, Marjorie (1952). Phytopathology, 42, 481.Google Scholar