Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T18:43:27.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of field treatments on processing quality of Record and Pentland Dell potatoes during storage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. C. Hogge ,
M. A. Stalham  and
E. J. Allen
M. C. Hogge
Affiliation:
Cambridge University Farm, Huntingdon Road, Girton, Cambridge CB3 OLH, UK
M. A. Stalham
Affiliation:
Cambridge University Farm, Huntingdon Road, Girton, Cambridge CB3 OLH, UK
E. J. Allen
Affiliation:
Cambridge University Farm, Huntingdon Road, Girton, Cambridge CB3 OLH, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Previous research has suggested that fry colour of processed potatoes is inversely correlated with tuber reducing sugar content, and agronomic practice should therefore be tailored to minimize amounts of tuber sugars at harvest and during storage as a means of maximizing processing quality. A total of 30 experiments from three sites in England from 1985 to 1988 examined this hypothesis for two cultivars using a wider range of husbandry than that used in practice and long periods of storage. No tuber sugar value was sufficiently well correlated with fry colour for the relationship to be interpreted as causal and of use predictively, irrespective of whether it was measured early in growth, at harvest or at the time of processing. Fry colour at harvest was not correlated with fry colour after storage. No agronomic practice (variables used were physiological age, date of planting, irrigation or date of harvest) consistently caused fry colours to be darker than the acceptable colour limit, whether at harvest or after long term storage. Crops producing unacceptable fry colours early in storage generally improved to produce acceptable fry colours after long term storage. Agronomic practices within the range normally found in commercial production are therefore considered to have little effect on long-term processing quality, although harvesting, handling and transport operations were not investigated.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 120 , Issue 3 , June 1993 , pp. 331 - 345
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Billington, R. V. (1984). Crop management factors and potato quality for frozen French fry production. Ada Horticulturae 163, 171–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J., Mackay, G. R., Bain, H., Griffith, D. W. & Allison, M. J. (1990). The processing potential of tubers of the cultivated potato, Solanum tuberosum L., after storage at low temperatures. 2. Sugar concentration. Potato Research 33, 219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burstall, L. & Harris, P. M. (1983). The estimation of percentage light interception from leaf area index and percentage ground cover in potatoes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 100, 241–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, W. G. (1965). The sugar balance in some British potato varieties during storage. I: Preliminary observations. European Potato Journal 8, 80–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, W. G. (1966). The Potato. Second Edition. Wageningen: Veenman.Google Scholar
Carlsson, H. (1970). Production of potatoes for chipping. Vaxtodling 26, 9–64.Google Scholar
Chase, R. W., Kitchen, R. W., Cash, J. N. & Santerre, C. R. (1982). The relationship of variety, nitrogen level and harvest date with yield, specific gravity, sucrose and chip quality. American Potato Journal 59, 463–464.Google Scholar
Clegg, M. D. & Chapman, H. W. (1962). Sucrose content of tubers and discoloration of chips from early summer potatoes. American Potato Journal 39, 212–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colenso, J. M. (1989). Effects of potato harvesting practices on skin abrasion and processing quality. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Danehy, J. P. & Pigman, W. W. (1951). Advances in Food Research 3, 241–290. New York Academic Press.Google Scholar
Denny, F. E. & Thornton, N. C. (1940). Factors for color in the production of potato chips. Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research 11, 291–303.Google Scholar
Hodge, J. E. (1953). Chemistry of browning reactions in model systems. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 1, 928–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogge, M. C. (1989). Effects of site, season and husbandry on yield and processing quality of the potato variety Pentland Dell. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hope, G. W., Mackay, D. C. & Townsend, L. R. (1960). The effect of date of harvest and rate of nitrogen fertilization on the maturity, yield and chipping quality of potatoes. American Potato Journal 37, 28–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, J. C. & Fuller, T. J. (1984). The effect of nitrogen during growth on sugar content and fry colour of c.v. Record during extended storage at 10 “C. In Abstracts of Conference Papers of the 9th Triennial Conference of the European Association of Potato Research, pp. 59–60.Google Scholar
Iritani, W. M. & Weller, L. D. (1977). Changes in sucrose and reducing sugar contents of Kennebec and Russet Burbank tubers during growth and post harvest holding temperatures. American Potato Journal 54, 395–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkpatrick, M. E., Heinze, P. H., Craft, C. C., Mountjoy, B. M. & Falatko, C. E. (1956). French-frying quality of potatoes as influenced by cooking methods, storage conditions and specific gravity of tubers. United States Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin 1142.Google Scholar
Kissmeyer-Nielsen, E. & Weckel, K. G. (1967). The effects of soil temperature, harvest sequence and storage on French fry processing quality of potatoes. European Potato Journal 10, 312–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludwig, J. W. (1987). The ‘colour index’ as standard for sugars in potatoes in the french fry-production. In Abstracts of Conference Papers and Posters of the 1Oth Triennial Conference of the European Association of Potato Research, pp. 93–94.Google Scholar
Mazza, G. (1983). Correlations between quality parameters of potatoes during growth and long-term storage. American Potato Journal 60, 145–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, R. A., Harrington, J. D. & Icuhn, G. C. (1975). Effect of variety and harvest date on tuber sugars and chip color. American Potato Journal 52, 379–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, D. C. & Shaw, R. (1976). Effect of planting and Processing quality of potatoes during storage 345 harvest dates, location in hill and tuber size on sugar content of Kennebec potatoes. American Potato Journal 53, 15–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, D. C. & Sowokinos, J. R. (1983). Yield and relationships among tuber size, sucrose and chip color in six potato cultivars on various harvest dates. American Potato Journal 60, 949–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pisarczyk, J. M. (1982). Field harvest damage affects potato tuber respiration and sugar content. American Potato Journal 59, 205–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, D. L., Davies, H. V. & Ross, H. A. (1990). An investigation into the factors influencing sugar levels in UK grown potatoes (cv. Record). Potato Research 33, 235–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, M. A., Faulks, R. M. & Belsten, J. L. (1990). Role of reducing sugars and amino acids in fry colour of chips from potatoes grown under different nitrogen regimes. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 52, 207–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santerre, C. R., Cash, J. N. & Chase, R. W. (1986). Influence of cultivar, harvest-date and soil nitrogen on sucrose, specific gravity and storage stability of potatoes grown in Michigan. American Potato Journal 63, 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sieczka, J. B. & Maatta, C. (1986). The effects of handling on chip color and sugar content of potato tubers. American Potato Journal 63, 363–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, O. (1959). Effect of variety, date of harvest and soil temperature on specific gravity of potatoes and color of potato chips. American Potato Journal 36, 304.Google Scholar
Smith, O. & Treadway, R. H. (1960). Functions of the protein and other nitrogenous fractions of potatoes in chip color development. American Potato Journal 37, 139–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sowokinos, J. R. (1973). Maturation of Solanum tuberosum. 1: Comparative sucrose and sucrose synthetase levels between several good and poor processing varieties. American Potato Journal 50, 234–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sowokinos, J. R. (1978). Relationship of harvest sucrose content to processing maturity and storage life of potatoes. American Potato Journal 55, 333–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sowokinos, J. R., Orr, P. H., Knoper, J. A. & Varns, J. L. (1987). Influence of potato storage and handling stress on sugars, chip quality and integrity of the starch (amyloplast) membrane. American Potato Journal 64, 213–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stalham, M. A. (1989). Growth and water use of the potato variety Record on contrasting sites. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sweetman, M. D. (1930). Color of potato chips as influenced by storage temperature of the tubers and other factors. Journal of Agricultural Research 41, 479–490.Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, M., Timm, H., Clegg, M. D. & Howard, F. D. (1966). Effect of stage of maturity and post harvest conditions on sugar conversion and chip quality of potato tubers. Proceedings of the American Society of Horticultural Science 89, 455–463.Google Scholar