Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T06:43:35.617Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of milk feeding on the pre- and post-weaning growth of calves, and on stomach development at weaning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. G. Kaiser
A. G. Kaiser
Affiliation:
N.S.W. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Centre, Wollongbar, N.S.W. 2480, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The pre-weaning and post-weaning gain, oaroass production and stomach development of oalves fed four levels of whole milk (8%, 10%, 12% and 14% of live weight daily) was studied in two experiments. Calves had access to pasture at all times and were weaned at 12 weeks. Pre-weaning gain, weaning live weight, and carcass weight at weaning all increased as the quantity of milk increased. At the 14% level, male calves reached heavier weaning live weights and produced heavier carcasses than females. Reticulo-rumen weight, when expressed as a percentage of total stomach weight, was significantly reduced with increased milk feeding. Calves reared on the higher quantities of milk gained more slowly after weaning, this being attributed to their poorer reticulo-rumen development at weaning.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 87 , Issue 2 , October 1976 , pp. 357 - 363
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Australian Meat Board (1971). Australian Beef Carcass Appraisal System. Publication No. AMB 6–71.Google Scholar
Barton, R. A. & Kirton, A. H. (1961). A comparison of whole milk with buttermilk in the rearing of calves for veal. 2. Slaughter and carcass composition data. Animal Production 3, 41–50.Google Scholar
Church, D. C. (1969). Digestive Physiology and Nutrition of Ruminants, vol. 1, pp. 27–38. Oregon, U.S.A.: D.C. Church.Google Scholar
Godfrey, N. W. (1961). The functional development of the calf. 1. Growth of the stomach of the calf. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 57, 173–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khouri, R. H. & Pickering, F. S. (1968). Nutrition of the milk-fed calf. 1. Performance of calves fed on different levels of whole milk relative to body weight. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 11, 227–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, J. H. L. (1969). Body composition and carcase characteristics of calves fed on different levels of whole milk relative to body weight. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 12, 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neville, W. E., McCullough, M. E., Sell, O. E. & Batrd, D. M. (1952). The effect of three levels of milk feeding to young calves on their growth rate and feed consumption. Journal of Animal Science 11, 772.Google Scholar
Roy, J. H. B. (1970). The Calf. Management and Feeding, 3rd ed., vol. 2, pp.26–7. London: Iliffe Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Rysavy, M. (1968). Weight changes of the digestive system of calves during the first month of life. Acta Universitatis Agricuturae Facultas Veterinaria, Brno 37, 529–35.Google Scholar
Tayler, J. C. (1966). The appetite and liveweight gain of calves fed ad libitum on both grass and cold or warm milk. Grassland Research Institute Technical Report, no. 3.Google Scholar