Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T02:30:28.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of tillage and direct drilling on soil properties during the growing season in a long-term barley mono-culture system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. D. Pidgeon  and
B. D. Soane
J. D. Pidgeon
Affiliation:
Scottish Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian, Scotland
B. D. Soane
Affiliation:
Scottish Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian, Scotland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Soil responses to deep (30–35 cm) and normal (15–20 cm) mouldboard ploughing, chisel ploughing and zero-tillage have been compared for 7 years in a field experiment growing continuous spring barley near Edinburgh. The soil was of variable texture, from moderately well-drained sandy loam overlying loam to imperfectly to poorly drained sandy clay loam overlying clay loam, classified as stagnogleyic brown earth to cambio stagnogley soil. Soils of this type derived from Carboniferous till are widely used for cereal production in south-east Scotland. Measurements of soil physical properties were made at crop emergence, midseason and at harvest to characterize seasonal and long-term responses to tillage and traffic. After the first 3 years bulk density responses varied little within or between seasons, showing a compacted horizon from 0–15 cm under zero-tillage and a looser horizon from 21–33 cm under deep ploughing compared with normal ploughing. Immediately below the depth of normal ploughing there was no difference in bulk density between this treatment and zero-tillage while in some years the chisel-ploughing treatment was denser. Moisture content responses on a weight basis, together with air-filled porosity responses, showed large differences between treatments particularly at the time of crop emergency, indicating substantial alterations in the soil profile hydrology. Expressed on a volume basis the increased moisture content near the surface under zero-tillage became more pronounced and the other effects disappeared. Cone resistance responses were proportionately larger than those for bulk density and showed one major difference in that below the depth of ploughing cone resistance was greater for zero-tillage than normal ploughing in the sixth and seventh seasons, but not previously. For bulk density, but probably not for cone resistance, there were no increases after the third season of zero-tillage, the soil reaching an equilibrium density for the current management practices and machinery usage.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 88 , Issue 2 , April 1977 , pp. 431 - 442
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aixen, H. P. (1975). ICI Plant Protection Division experience with direct drilling systems, 1961–74. Outlook on Agriculture 8, 213–15.Google Scholar
Allmaras, R. R. (1968). Soil water storage as affected by infiltration and evaporation in relation to tillageinduced soil structure. In Tillage for Greater Crop Production, pp. 37–43. St. Joseph, Mich: A.S.A.E. Publication. PROC-168.Google Scholar
A.S.A.E. (1968). Tillage for Greater Crop Production. St. Joseph, Mich: A.S.A.E. Publication. PROC-168.Google Scholar
Baetjmer, K. & Bakermans, W. A. P. (1973). Zerotillage.Advances in Agronomy 25, 77–123.Google Scholar
British Standards Institution (1975). Methods of test for soils for civil engineering purposes. BS 1377: 1975. London: British Standards Institution.Google Scholar
Burnett, E. & Hatjser, V. L. (1968). Deep tillage and soil-plant-water relationships. In Tillage for greater crop production, pp. 47–52. St. Joseph, Mich.: A.S.A.E. Publication. PROC-168.Google Scholar
Cannell, R. Q. & Fujney, J. R. (1973). Effect of direct drilling and reduced cultivation on soil conditions for root growth. Outlook on Agriculture 7, 184–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, D. B. & Cannell, R. Q. (1976). Review of experiments on reduced cultivation and direct drilling in the United Kingdom 1957–74. Outlook on Agriculture 8, 216–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eavis, B. W. (1972). Soil physical conditions affecting seedling root growth. I. Mechanical impedance, aeration and moisture availability as influenced by bulk density and moisture levels in a sandy loam soil. Plant and Soil 36, 613–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehlers, W. (1975). Observation on earthworm channels and infiltration on tilled and untilled loess soil. Soil Science 119, 242–9.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. G. (1975). Reduced cultivation and direct drilling in farming systems. Outlook on Agriculture 8, 250–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finney, J. R. & Knight, B. A. G. (1973). The effect of soil physical conditions produced by various cultivation systems on the root development of winter wheat. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 80, 435–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, D. J. (1969). Effect of oxygen distribution in the soil on plant growth. In Root Growth (ed. Whittington, W. J.), pp. 202–21. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. C. & Lockhabt, D. A. S. (1970). Cultivations in relation to continuous barley growing. I. Crop growth and development. Proceedings International Conference Tillage Research Methods, Silsoe, 46–57.Google Scholar
Lal, R. (1974). No-tillage effect on soil properties and maize production in western Nigeria. Plant and Soil 40, 321–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, D. E. (1975). The development and assessment of reduced cultivation machinery. Outlook on Agriculture 8, 236–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragg, J. M. & Futty, D. W. (1967). Soils of the country round Haddington and Eyemouth. Memoirs of the Soil Survey of Scotland. H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Smith, K. A. & Dowdell, R. J. (1974). Field studies of the soil atmosphere. I. Relationships between ethylene, oxygen, soil moisture content and temperature. Journal of Soil Science 25, 217–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soane, B. D. (1968). A gamma-ray transmission method for the measurement of soil density in field tillage studies. Journal of Agricultural Engineering 13, 340–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soane, B. D., Campbell, D. J. & Herkes, S. M. (1970). Cultivations in relation to continuous barley growing. II. Soil physical properties. Proceedings International Conference Tillage Research Methods, Silsoe, 58–76.Google Scholar
Soane, B. D., Campbell, D. J. & Herkes, S. M. (1971). Hand-held gamma-ray transmission equipment for the measurement of bulk density of field soils. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 16, 145–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soane, B. D. & Pidgeon, J. D. (1975). Tillage requirement in relation to soil physical properties. Soil Science 119, 376–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinhardt, R. & Traitord, B. D. (1974). Some effects of sub-surface drainage and ploughing on the structure and compactability of a clay soil. Journal of Soil Science 25, 138–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, H. M. (1968). Effects of tillage-induced soil environmental changes on root growth. In Tillage for Greater Crop Production, pp. 15–18. St. Joseph, Mich.: A.S.A.E. Publication. PROC-168.Google Scholar
Trouse, A. C. & Humbert, R. P. (1961). Some effects of soil compaction on the development of sugar cane roots. Soil Science 91, 208–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Doren, D. M. (1968). Changes in seed environment due to tillage. In Tillage for Greater Crop Production, pp. 5–9. St. Joseph, Mich.: A.S.A.E. Publication. PROC-28.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, B. (1975). Soil types and direct drilling – a provisional assessment. Outlook on Agriculture 8, 233–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar