Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T09:18:29.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of separation plus acidification with nitric acid and separation plus dilution to make cattle slurry a balanced, efficient fertilizer for grass and silage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. J. Stevens ,
R. J. Laughlin ,
J. P. Frost  and
R. Anderson
R. J. Stevens
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland, Food and Agricultural Chemistry Research Division, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, UK
R. J. Laughlin
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland, Food and Agricultural Chemistry Research Division, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, UK
J. P. Frost
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co Down BT26 6DR, UK
R. Anderson
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland, Food and Agricultural Chemistry Research Division, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Combinations of treatments of cattle slurry, which have previously been shown to have lowered ammonia volatilization by 75% of that from whole slurry, were compared in a field experiment with perennial ryegrass at the Agricultural Research Institute, Hillsborough in 1990. Whole slurry and slurries obtained by separation through screens with mesh sizes of 5·0, 3·0, 1·1 and 0·4mm were acidified with 1·4% by volume of 10M nitric acid. Slurries separated through 5·0 and 0·4 mm meshes were diluted 100% and 50% respectively by volume with water and amended with calcium nitrate to supply the same amount of nitrogen as the nitric acid. All slurry combinations were surface-applied at 100 kg (NH4+-N + NO3−-N)/ha to different plots on three occasions during the growing season. Volatilization of ammonia was measured on adjacent plots using ventilated enclosures. By comparison with inorganic fertilizer treatments, assessments were made of the efficiency of slurry nitrogen for herbage production, the fertilizer value of phosphorus, potassium and sulphur in the slurry, and the effects of slurry on silage quality.

The mean ammonia volatilization over all applications of acidified slurries was 17% of that from whole slurry. The two separation plus dilution treatments, however, only lowered volatilization to about half of that from whole slurry. Within separation plus acidification treatments, the trend was for dry matter yield and nitrogen offtake to increase as mesh size decreased down to 1.1 mm. For slurries separated through 5·0 and 0·4 mm meshes, the effect of the additional dilution treatment on dry matter yield and nitrogen offtake was similar to the effect of acidification. Efficiency of nitrogen offtake over all three cuts, relative to inorganic fertilizer nitrogen, was 54% for acidified whole slurry and 88% for slurry separated through a 1·1 mm mesh and acidified. Denitrification in nitric-acid amended slurries and sward contamination from slurry solids may have been responsible for lowering nitrogen efficiency.

Chemical analyses of herbage showed that the concentrations of phosphorus, potassium and sulphur from the slurry treatments were comparable to those in herbage receiving the recommended rates of inorganic fertilizers and were sufficient for optimum yield. Slurry application had a detrimental effect on the fermentation quality of the ensiled herbage. Chemical analyses indicated that fermentations from two slurry treatments at the first cut and all slurry treatments at the third cut were poorer than those on treatments receiving the equivalent rate of inorganic fertilizer nitrogen.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 119 , Issue 3 , December 1992 , pp. 391 - 399
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, R. (1983). The effect of extended moist wilting and formic acid additive on the conservation as silage of two grasses differing in total nitrogen content. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 34, 808–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunke, R., Alvo, P., Schuepp, P. & Gordon, R. (1988). Effect of meteorological parameters on ammonia loss from manure in the field. Journal of Environmental Quality 17, 431–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clement, C. R. & Hopper, M. J. (1968). The supply of potassium to higher yielding cut grass. National Agriculture Advisory Service Quarterly Review 79, 101–109.Google Scholar
Department of Agriculture, Northern Ireland (1986). Annual Report on Research, Development and Technical Work, p. 29. Belfast: HMSO.Google Scholar
Firestone, M. K. & Davidson, E. A. (1989). Microbiological basis of NO and N2O production and consumption in soil. In Exchange of Trace Gases Between Terrestrial Ecosystems and the Atmosphere (Eds Andreae, M. M. & Schimel, D. D.), pp. 7–21. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Frost, J. P., Stevens, R. J. & Laughlin, R. J. (1990). Effect of separation and acidification of cattle slurry on ammonia volatilization and on the efficiency of slurry nitrogen for herbage production. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 115, 49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, S. C. & Pain, B. F. (1990). Ammonia volatilization from agricultural land. Proceedings of the Fertilizer Society, No. 298.Google Scholar
Jones, L. H. P., Cowling, D. W. & Lockyer, D. R. (1972). Plant-available and extractable sulphur in some soils of England and Wales. Soil Science 114, 104–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kissel, D. E., Brewer, H. L. & Arkin, G. F. (1977). Design and test of a field sampler for ammonia volatilization. Soil Science Society of America Journal 41, 1133–1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCullough, M. E. (1978). Silage-some general considerations. In Fermentation of Silage-a Review (Ed. McCullough, M. M.), pp. 1–26. Iowa: National Feed Ingredients Association.Google Scholar
McDonald, P. & Whittenbury, R. (1973). The ensilage process. In Chemistry and Biochemistry of Herbage (Eds Butler, G. G. & Bailey, R. R.), Vol 3, pp. 33–58. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
McDonald, P., Henderson, N. & Heron, S. (1991). The Biochemistry of Silage. Marlow: Chalcombe Publications.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1986). Profitable Utilisation of Livestock Manures. Booklet 2081. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1988). Fertilizer Recommendations for Agricultural and Horticultural Crops. Reference Book 209. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Pain, B. F., Thompson, R. B., Lande, Cremer L. C. N. De La & Ten, Holte N. (1987). The use of additives in livestock slurries to improve their flow properties, conserve nitrogen and reduce odours. In Animal Manure on Grassland and Fodder Crops (Eds van, H. H., Unwin, R. R., Dijk, T. A. van & Ennik, G. G.), pp. 229–246. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Pain, B. F., Thompson, R. B., Rees, Y. J. & Skinner, J. H. (1990). Reducing gaseous losses of nitrogen from cattle slurry applied to grassland by the use of additives. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 50, 141—153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prins, W. H. & Snijders, P. J. M. (1987). Negative effects of animal manures on grassland due to surface spreading and injection. In Animal Manure on Grassland and Fodder Crops (Eds Meer, H. G. van der, Unwin, R. J., Dijk, T. A. van & Ennik, G. C.), pp. 119–135. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Schechtner, G., Tunney, H., Arnold, G. H. & Keuning, J. A. (1980). Positive and negative effects of cattle manure on grassland with special reference to high rates of application. In The Role of Nitrogen in Intensive Grassland Production (Eds Prins, W. W. & Arnold, G. G.), pp. 77–93. Wageningen: Pudoc.Google Scholar
Smith, D. (1973). The nonstructural carbohydrates. In Chemistry and Biochemistry of Herbage (Eds Butler, G. G. & Bailey, R. R.), Vol 1, pp. 105–155. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Smith, K. A. & Unwin, R. J. (1985). Fertilizer value of animal waste slurries. In Crop Nutrition and Soil Science (Ed. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food), Reference Book 253 (83), pp. 11–41. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Sommer, S. G. & Olesen, J. E. (1991). Effect of dry matter content and temperature on ammonia loss from surface-applied cattle slurry. Journal of Environmental Quality 20, 679–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, R. J. & Watson, C. J. (1986). The response of grass for silage to sulphur application at 20 sites in Northern Ireland. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107, 565–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, R. J., Laughlin, R. J. & Logan, H. J. (1987). Interaction between cow slurry and 15N-labelled calcium nitrate as fertilizers for ryegrass production. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 41, 309–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, R. J., Laughlin, R. J. & Frost, J. P. (1989). Effect of acidification with sulphuric acid on the volatilization of ammonia from cow and pig slurries. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 113, 389–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, R. J., Laughlin, R. J. & Frost, J. P. (1992). Effects of separation, dilution, washing and acidification on ammonia volatilization from surface-applied cattle slurry. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 119, 383–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, R. B., Pain, B. F. & Lockyer, D. R. (1990). Ammonia volatilization from cattle slurry following surface application to grassland. I. Influence of mechanical separation, changes in chemical composition during volatilization and the presence of the grass sward. Plant and Soil 125, 109–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tunney, H., Molloy, S. & Codd, F. (1980). Effects of cattle slurry, pig slurry and fertilizer on yield and quality of grass silage. In Effluents from Livestock (Eds Gasser, J. K. R., Hawkins, J. J., O'callaghan, J. R. & Pain, B. B.), pp. 327–343. London: Applied Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Unwin, R. J., Pain, B. F. & Whinham, W. N. (1986). The effect of rate and time of application of nitrogen in cow slurry on grass cut for silage. Agricultural Wastes 15, 253–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vetter, H., Steffens, G. & Schropel, R. (1987). The influence of different processing methods for slurry upon its fertilizer value in grassland. In Animal Manure on Grassland and Fodder Crops (Eds Meer, H-G. van der, Unwin, R. R., Dijk, T. A. van & Ennik, G. G.), pp. 73–86. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Watson, C. J. & Stevens, R. J. (1986) The sulphur content of slurries and fertilisers. Record of Agricultural Research, Department of Agriculture, Northern Ireland 34, 5–7.Google Scholar
Wit, C. T. De, Dijkshoorn, W. J. & Noggle, J. C. (1963). Ionic balance and growth of plants. Verslagen Landbouw Onderzoekingen 69, 69.Google Scholar