Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-cx56b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-07T06:14:06.250Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Food-intake level in some Romney Marsh ewes and follicle-group development in their progeny

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. B. Wildman
A. B. Wildman
Affiliation:
Wool Industries Research Association
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. An experiment was carried out in which twelve Romney Marsh ewes were separated into two groups, one kept on a high plane of food intake and one on a low plane during pregnancy and lactation. Skin and wool samples were taken from the progeny at birth and weaning; the ratio Sf/Pf was determined for these ages as well as the proportion of follicles of various kinds and in different phases of activity. The results are compared with those of Ryder from an earlier experiment with Cheviots.

2. Differences in food intake of ewes of the order described affected live weight at weaning, but did not significantly affect the differentiation and development of secondary follicles in the foetus nor their number at weaning.

3. Lambs in the low-plane group shed secondary fibres at 12 months old much more than those which had been in the high-plane group.

4. A partial association of variation in birth Sf/Pf with variation in birth weight was demonstrated, but more than half the variation in this ratio is not accounted for in this way, and the same applies to the variation in birth S/P of the Cheviots in Ryder's earlier experiment. It is suggested that variations in foetal environment and in the early post-natal period affect the rate at which the secondary follicle population in a lamb develops towards its mature genetic maximum.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 51 , Issue 3 , December 1958 , pp. 307 - 316
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Auber, L. (1952). Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb. 63, 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, M. (1953). J. Agric. Sci. 43, 4, 422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, M. (1954). J. Agric. Sci. 44, 4, 443.Google Scholar
Carter, H. B. & Hardy, M. H. (1947). Bull. Coun. Sci. Industr. Res. Aust. no. 215.Google Scholar
Ferguson, K. A., Schinckel, P. G., Carter, H. B. & Clarke, W. H. (1956). Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 9, 575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, M. H. & Lyne, A. G. (1956). Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 9, 423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, M. H. & Lyne, A. G. (1956). Nature, Lond., 177, 705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hugo, W. J. (1953). Merino Breeders' Journal, 15, no. 4, 12.Google Scholar
Hugo, W. J. (1954). Merino Breeders' Journal, 16, no. 1, 19.Google Scholar
Rougeout, J. (1957). Communication to Societé de Biologie, Paris, 11 May 1957.Google Scholar
Ryder, M. L. (1955). J. Text. Inst. 46, T565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryder, M. L. (1958). In Montagna, W. (ed), The Biology of Hair Growth. New York: Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
Schinckel, P. G. (1953). Nature, Lond., 171, 310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schinckel, P. G. (1955). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 6, 68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schinckel, P. G. (1955). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 6, 308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Short, B. F. (1955). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 6, 863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeates, N. T. M. (1955). Aust. J. Agric. Sci. 6, 891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeates, N. T. M. (1957). Aust. J. Agric. Sci. 8, 733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar