Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:12:54.026Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In situ techniques to predict in vivo digestibility and to evaluate the impact of flint maize processing methods on degradation parameters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2021

L. A. Godoi Open the ORCID record for L. A. Godoi [Opens in a new window] ,
B. C. Silva Open the ORCID record for B. C. Silva [Opens in a new window] ,
A. C. B. Menezes ,
F. A. S. Silva ,
H. M. Alhadas Open the ORCID record for H. M. Alhadas [Opens in a new window] ,
N. V. Trópia ,
J. T. Silva ,
D. R. Andrade ,
J. P. Schoonmaker  and
S. C. Valadares Filho
L. A. Godoi*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, 36570-900, Brazil
B. C. Silva
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, 36570-900, Brazil
A. C. B. Menezes
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, 36570-900, Brazil
F. A. S. Silva
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, 36570-900, Brazil
H. M. Alhadas
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, 36570-900, Brazil
N. V. Trópia
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, 36570-900, Brazil
J. T. Silva
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, 36570-900, Brazil
D. R. Andrade
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, 36570-900, Brazil
J. P. Schoonmaker
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, Creighton Hall of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
S. C. Valadares Filho
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, 36570-900, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: L. A. Godoi, E-mail: leticia.godoi@ufv.br
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study aimed to (1) evaluate the effects of flint maize processing methods on the estimation of the readily soluble fraction (a), the potentially degradable fraction (b) and the rate of degradation of b (c) for dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM) and starch in the rumen; and (2) verify whether two different applications of in situ technique can be used to estimate in vivo DM, OM and starch digestibilities. Five ruminally cannulated Nellore bulls (265 ± 18.2 kg; 8 ± 1.0 mo) were distributed in a 5 × 5 Latin square. Three experimental diets were composed of 0.30 whole-plant maize silage, 0.10 supplement and 0.60 of one of the following processing methods: dry ground maize grain (DMG); high-moisture maize (HMM); reconstituted maize grain silage (RMG). Two additional diets were composed of 0.10 supplement, 0.80 snaplage and 0.10 stalklage (SNAP-80); or 0.10 supplement and 0.90 snaplage (SNAP-90). Digestibilities were estimated using in vivo procedure or predicted from in situ technique using a single 24 h incubation point or an equation proposed in previous literature. Diets based on ensiled grains presented greater (P < 0.05) fraction a and c and lower (P < 0.05) fraction b of DM, OM and starch compared to DMG. Both alternative use of in situ technique accurately estimated (P > 0.05) in vivo DM, OM and starch digestibilities. The results suggest that ensilage process may increase the availability of nutrients. The two different applications of in situ technique showed precision and accuracy to estimate in vivo digestibility.

Keywords

Grain silagehigh-moisture maizereconstituted maizeruminal incubationsnaplage
Type
Animal Research Paper
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 158 , Issue 8-9 , November 2020 , pp. 756 - 766
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akins, MS and Shaver, RD (2014) Effect of corn snaplage on lactation performance by dairy cows. The Professional Animal Scientist 30, 86–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, MS (2015) Starch Availability, Measurement and Implications for Ration Formulation. Ithaca, New York: eCommons, Cornell University. Available at: https://ecommons.cornell.edu/handle/1813/39199.Google Scholar
AOAC (2006) Official Methods of Analysis, 18th Edn, Gaithersburg, MD, USA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Inc.Google Scholar
AOAC (2012) Official Methods of Analysis, 19th Edn, Arlington, VA, USA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Inc.Google Scholar
Benedeti, PDB, Valadares Filho, SC, Zanetti, D, Silva, FF, Silva, BC, Alhadas, HM, Pereira, JMV, Pacheco, MVC, Pucetti, P, Menezes, ACB, Silva, FAS, Godoi, LA and Santos, SA (2019) Prediction of in Vivo organic matter digestibility of beef cattle diets from degradation parameters estimated from in Situ and in vitro incubations. The Journal of Agricultural Science 157, 711–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernardes, T and Castro, T (2019) PSXII-12 Silages and roughage sources in the Brazilian beef feedlots. Journal of Animal Science 97, 411–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bibby, J and Toutenburg, H (1977) Prediction and Improved Estimation in Linear Models. Berlin, Germany: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Caetano, M, Goulart, RS, Silva, SD, Drouillard, JS, Leme, PR and Lanna, DP (2015) Effect of flint corn processing method and roughage level on finishing performance of Nellore-based cattle. Journal of Animal Science 93, 4023–4033.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, DE, Bender, RW, Shinners, KJ and Combs, DK (2016) The effects of calcium hydroxide-treated whole-plant and fractionated corn silage on intake, digestion, and lactation performance in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 99, 5385–5393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Godoi, LA, Silva, BC, Silva, FAZ, Pucetti, P, Pacheco, MVC, Souza, GAP, Lage, BC, Rennó, LN, Schoonmaker, JP and Valadares Filho, SC (2021) Effect of flint corn processing methods on intake, digestion sites, rumen pH, and ruminal kinetics in finishing Nellore bulls. Animal Feed Science and Technology 271, 114775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmon, DL and Swanson, KC (2020) Review: nutritional regulation of intestinal starch and protein assimilation in ruminants. Animal: An International Journal of Animal Bioscience 14, 17–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harmon, DL, Yamka, RM and Elam, NA (2004) Factors affecting intestinal starch digestion in ruminants: a review. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 84, 309–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinrichs, AJ (2013) The Penn State Particle Separator. Extension Publication DSE 2013-186. College Park: Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
Hicks, RB and Lake, RP (2006) Cattle grain processing symposium. In High Moisture Corn Quality Control at Hitch. Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA: Oklahoma State University, pp. 56–61. Available at: http://beef.okstate.edu/files/Proceedings%20final.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, PC, Esser, NM, Shaver, RD, Coblentz, WK, Scott, MP, Bodnar, AL, Schmidt, RJ and Charley, RC (2011) Influence of ensiling time and inoculation on alteration of the starch-protein matrix in high-moisture maize. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 2465–2474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, PC, Mertens, DR, Larson, J, Coblentz, WK and Shaver, RD (2012) A query for effective mean particle size in dry and high-moisture corns. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 3467–3477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huntington, GB, Harmon, DL and Richards, CJ (2006) Sites, rates, and limits of starch digestion and glucose metabolism in growing cattle. Journal of Animal Science 84, 14–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Junges, D, Morais, G, Spoto, MH, Santos, PS, Adesogan, AT, Nussio, LG and Daniel, JL (2017) Influence of various proteolytic sources during fermentation of reconstituted corn grain silages. Journal of Dairy Science 100, 9048–9051.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kobayashi, K and Salam, MU (2000) Comparing simulated and measured values using mean squared deviation and its components. Agronomy Journal 92, 345–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kononoff, PJ, Heinrichs, AJ and Lehman, HA (2003) The effect of corn silage particle size on eating behavior, chewing activities, and rumen fermentation in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 3343–3353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kung, L, Shaver, RD, Grant, RJ and Schmidt, RJ (2018) Silage review: interpretation of chemical, microbial, and organoleptic components of silages. Journal of Dairy Science 101, 4020–4033.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lardy, G and Anderson, V (2016a) Harvesting, Storing and Feeding Corn as Earlage AS-1490, 1–4.Google Scholar
Lardy, G and Anderson, V (2016b) Harvesting, Storing and Feeding High-moisture Corn AS-1484, 1–4.Google Scholar
Licitra, G, Hernandez, TM and Van Soest, PJ (1996) Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology 57, 347–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machado, MG, Detmann, E, Mantovani, HC, Valadares Filho, SC, Bento, CBP, Marcondes, MI and Assunção, AS (2016) Evaluation of the length of adaptation period for changeover and crossover nutritional experiments with cattle fed tropical forage-based diets. Animal Feed Science and Technology 222, 132–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahanna, B (2008) Bottom Line: Renewed Interest in Snaplage Displayed. Feedstuffs. 80(50), Dec. 8, 2008. Bloomington, MN: The Miller Publ. Co..Google Scholar
Mayer, DG, Stuart, MA and Swain, AJ (1994) Regression of real-world data on model output: an appropriate overall test of validity. Agricultural Systems 45, 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menezes, ACB, Valadares Filho, SC, Pacheco, MVC, Pucetti, P, Pereira, JMV, Rotta, PP, Zanetti, D, Silva, BC, Costa e Silva, LF, Detmann, E, Neville, TL and Caton, JS (2019) Single point ruminal incubation times necessary to estimate rumen degradable protein content in concentrate feeds. Translational Animal Science 3, 1686–1690.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mertens, DR (2002) Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beakers or crucibles: collaborative study. Journal of AOAC International 85, 1217–1240.Google ScholarPubMed
Millen, DD, Pacheco, RDL, Arrigoni, MDB, Galyean, ML and Vasconcelos, JT (2009) A snapshot of management practices and nutritional recommendations used by feedlot nutritionists in Brazil. Journal of Animal Science 87, 3427–3439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mu-Forster, C and Wasserman, BP (1998) Surface localization of zein storage proteins in starch granules from maize endosperm: proteolytic removal by thermolysin and in vitro cross-linking of granule-associated polypeptides. Plant Physiology 116, 1563–1571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nocek, JE (1988) In situ and other methods to estimate ruminal protein and energy digestibility: a review. Journal of Dairy Science 71, 2051–2069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Offner, A and Sauvant, D (2004) Prediction of in vivo starch digestion in cattle from in situ data. Animal Feed Science and Technology 111, 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, CA and Millen, DD (2014) Survey of the nutritional recommendations and management practices adopted by feedlot cattle nutritionists in Brazil. Animal Feed Science and Technology 197, 64–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, ER and McDonald, I (1979) The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. The Journal of Agricultural Science 92, 499–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, FN, Zinn, RA and Kim, YK (1986) Limits to starch digestion in the ruminant small intestine. Journal of Animal Science 63, 1634–1648.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Owens, CE, Zinn, RA, Hassen, A and Owens, FN (2016) Mathematical linkage of total-tract digestion of starch and neutral detergent fiber to their fecal concentrations and the effect of site of starch digestion on extent of digestion and energetic efficiency of cattle. The Professional Animal Scientist 32, 531–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petzel, EA, Titgemeyer, EC, Smart, AJ, Hales, KE, Foote, AP, Acharya, S, Bailey, EA, Held, JE and Brake, DW (2019) What is the digestibility and caloric value of different botanical parts in corn residue to cattle? Journal of Animal Science 97, 3056–3070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinto, AC and Millen, DD (2018) Nutritional recommendations and management practices adopted by feedlot cattle nutritionists: the 2016 Brazilian survey. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 99, 392–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, CJ, Branco, AF, Bohnert, DW, Huntington, GB, Macari, M and Harmon, DL (2002) Intestinal starch disappearance increased in steers abomasally infused with starch and protein. Journal of Animal Science 80, 3361–3368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salvo, PAR, Gritti, VC, Daniel, JLP, Martins, LS, Lopes, F, Santos, FAP and Nussio, LG (2020) Fibrolytic enzymes improve the nutritive value of high-moisture corn for finishing bulls. Journal of Animal Science 98, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silva, BC, Godoi, LA, Valadares Filho, SC, Zanetti, D, Benedeti, PDB and Detmann, E (2019) A suitable enzymatic method for starch quantification in different organic matrices. MethodsX 6, 2322–2328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silva, BC, Pacheco, MVC, Godoi, LA, Silva, FAS, Zanetti, D, Menezes, ACB, Pucetti, P, Santos, SA, Paulino, MF and Valadares Filho, SC (2020) In situ and in vitro techniques for estimating degradation parameters and digestibility of diets based on maize or sorghum. The Journal of Agricultural Science 158, 150–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tedeschi, LO (2006) Assessment of the adequacy of mathematical models. Agricultural Systems 89, 225–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valadares Filho, SC, Costa e Silva, LF, Gionbelli, MP, Rotta, PP, Marcondes, MI, Chizzotti, ML and Prados, LF (2016) Nutrient Requirements of Zebu Beef Cattle (BR-CORTE), 3rd Edn. Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brasil: Suprema Gráfica Ltda, 314 p.Google Scholar
Valadares Filho, SC, Silva, BC, Pacheco, MVC, Menezes, ACB, Godoi, LA, Alhadas, HM, Silva, FF, Paulino, PVR and Rennó, LN (2018) PSXI-32 Ensiling time effects on nitrogen fractions and effects of ensiling corn and sorghum grains rehydrated on intake, ruminal and intestinal starch digestibility. Journal of Animal Science 96, 424–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zinn, RA, Barreras, A, Corona, L, Owens, FN and Plascencia, A (2011) Comparative effects of processing methods on the feeding value of maize in feedlot cattle. Nutrition Research Reviews 24, 183–190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Godoi et al. supplementary material

Figures S1-S4

Download Godoi et al. supplementary material(File)
File 6.6 MB