Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-qks25 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T20:05:10.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Infertility and neonatal mortality in the sow. IV. Further observations and conclusions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. W. Pomeroy
R. W. Pomeroy
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

During the course of the main investigation the following observations were made on some other aspects of reproduction in the sow.

An examination of the reproductive tract of sows killed at slaughterhouses in East Anglia showed a high percentage of cystic abnormalities in the ovaries (Perry & Pomeroy, 1956). However, the sample of sows necessarily excluded any gilts, so an examination has been made of the incidence of ovarian abnormalities in post-pubertal gilts at two bacon factories. The ovaries of 273 gilts were examined and divided into (a) ovaries containing corpora lutea, (b) ovaries not containing corpora lutea. These were then further classified as normal or abnormal. The chief criteria of abnormality were the presence of cystic follicles, i.e. of greater than ovulatory size (10 mm. in diameter) or cystic corpora lutea, i.e. large flabby corpora lutea with hollow centres. Gilts with numerous haemorrhagic follicles in the ovaries were also classified as abnormal, but it is quite possible that this condition is a common occurrence in gilts just before puberty. However, rather than underestimate the incidence of abnormalities these ovaries were classified as abnormal.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , February 1960 , pp. 57 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bacsich, P. (1948). Proc. Soc. Endocrin. 10th Meeting.Google Scholar
Brambell, F. W. R. (1948). Biol. Rev. 23, 370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burger, J. F. (1952). Onderstepoort. J. Vet. Res. 25, no. 2, 1.Google Scholar
Cole, W. H., Howell, C. E. & Hart, G. H. (1931). Anat. Rec. 49, 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corner, G. W. (1921). Contr. Embryol. Carneg. Instn, 13, 117.Google Scholar
Corner, G. W. (1923). Amer. J. Anat. 31, 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crew, F. A. E. (1925). Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb. 46, 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgar, D. G. (1953). J. Endocrin. 10, 54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, J. (1914). J. Agric. Sci. 6, 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, J. (1944). Proc. Nutrition Society, 2, 8.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1949). Brit. J. Nutrit. 3, 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, C. G. (1926). Amer. J. Anat. 37, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, H. H. K., Moustgaard, J. & Olsen, N. H. (1952). Dansk Mannedskr. Dyrlaeg, 63, no. 1, 11.Google Scholar
Marshall, F. H. A. (1922). The Physiology of Reproduction. London: Longmans, Green and Co.Google Scholar
Marshall, F. H. A. & Hammond, J. (1937). Fertility and animal breeding, Bull. Minist. Agric., Loud., no. 32.Google Scholar
Nalbandov, A. V. (1952). Fertil. & Steril. 3, 100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkes, A. S. (1925). J. Agric. Sci. 15, 284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pakkes, A. S. (1926). Biol. Rev. 2, No. 1, 1.Google Scholar
Perry, J. S. (1954). J. Embryol. Exp. Morph. 2, 308.Google Scholar
Perry, J. S. & Pombroy, R. W. (1956). J. Agric. Sci. 47, 238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, R. W. & Zeller, J. H. (1943). Anat. Rec. 85, 387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, G. L., Casida, L. E., Grummer, R. H. & Chapman, A. B. (1951). J. Anim. Sci. 10, 647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Self, H. L., Grummer, R. H. & Casida, L. E. (1955). J. Anim. Sci. 14, 573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spray, C. M. & Widdowson, E. M. (1951). Brit. J. Nutr. 4, 361.Google Scholar
Wallace, L. R. (1948). J. Agric. Sci. 38, 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warwick, B. L. (1928). J. Morphol. & Physiol. 46, 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar