Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-05T02:42:23.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intercropping wheat and barley with N-fixing legume species: a method for improving ground cover, N-use efficiency and productivity in low input systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. P. Reynolds ,
K. D. Sayre  and
H. E. Vivar
M. P. Reynolds
Affiliation:
Wheat Program CIMMYT
K. D. Sayre
Affiliation:
Wheat Program CIMMYT
H. E. Vivar
Affiliation:
Barley Program ICARDA/CIMMYT, Lisboa 27, Apdo Postal 6–641, 06600 Mexico, D.F., Mexico
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Two cereal cropping systems are described which, through the introduction of a leguminous intercrop, increased productivity, nitrogen output and ground cover of the systems in the absence of added nitrogen fertilizer. Nitrogen-fixing legumes were cultivated between rows of wheat or barley grown at low levels of soil nitrogen, and mostly under rainfed conditions, in Mexico between 1989 and 1992. None of the legumes tested reduced yields of the cereal crop in comparison to controls where cereal yields were in the range of 1–4 t/ha, while the extra total biomass from legumes in some cases more than doubled productivity. Different legume crops were tested to demonstrate the adaptability of the system to the varying needs of farmers. The intercropped legumes achieved dry biomass yields as high as 6·5 t/ha in the case of a sequentially cropped forage crop of hairy vetch, or 1·4 t/ha of dry beans plus 3·5 t/ha of green residue in the case of Vicia faba. Total biomass in the intercropped situation gave land equivalent ratios as high as 1·54. Light measurements inside the crop canopies indicated that the intercropped systems intercepted a higher proportion of the incident solar radiation than the cereal monocrop, presumably accounting for the large differences in total biomass produced. In addition, with leaf nitrogen levels of 3·8%, it is assumed that the intercropped legumes fixed considerably more nitrogen than was removed by the wheat crop. The potential of the system to stabilize erodible soils by increasing ground cover as well as by raising inputs of soil organic matteris discussed.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 123 , Issue 2 , October 1994 , pp. 175 - 183
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Approved Methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemists (1983). Methods 46–10 & 46–11 in Approved Methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemists, 7th edn.St Paul, Minnesota: AACC.Google Scholar
Brady, N. C. (1974). The Nature and Properties of Soils, 8th edn.New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Bray, R. H. & Kurtz, L. T. (1945). Determination of total organic and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Science 59, 39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremner, J. M. (1960). Determination of nitrogen in soil by the Kjeldahl method. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 55, 11–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byerlee, D. & Longmire, J. (1986). Comparative advantage and policy incentives for wheat production in rainfed and irrigated areas of Mexico. CIMMYT Economics Program, Working Paper No. 01/86.Google Scholar
Cornick, T. R. & Kirby, R. A. (1981). Interaction of crops and livestock production in the generation of technology in sloped areas. Publication of New York State College of Agriculture of Life Science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar
Danso, S. K. A. & Papastylianou, I. (1992). Evaluation of the nitrogen contribution of legumes to subsequent cereals. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 119, 13–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giller, K. E. & Wilson, K. J. (1991). Nitrogen Fixation in Tropical Cropping Systems. Wallingford: CAB International.Google Scholar
Gillman, G. P. & Sumpter, E. A. (1986). Modification to the compulsive exchange method for measuring exchange characteristics of soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research 24, 61–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gliessman, S. R. (1986). Plant interactions in multiple cropping systems. In Multiple Cropping Systems (Ed. Francis, C. A.), pp. 82–95. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Grubinger, V. P. & Minotti, P. L. (1990). Managing white clover living mulch for sweet corn production with partial rototilling. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 5, 4–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izaurralde, R. C., Juma, N. G. & McGill, W. B. (1990). Plant and nitrogen yield of barley-field pea intercrop in cryoboreal-subhumid central Alberta. Agronomy Journal 82, 295–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, L. & Clements, R. O. (1993). Development of a low input system for growing wheat (Triticum vulgare) in a permanent understorey of white clover (Trifolium repens). Annals of Applied Biology 123, 109–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langdale, G. W., Clark, R. L. & Bruce, R. R. (1992). The role of legumes in sustaining soil productivity and controlling soil erosion. In Biological Nitrogen Fixation and Sustainability in Tropical Agriculture (Eds Mulongoy, K., Gueye, M. & Spencer, D. S. C.), pp. 361–366. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Mason, S. C., Leihner, D. E. & Vorst, J. J. (1986). Cassava cowpea and cassava-peanut intercropping. III. Nutrient concentrations and removal. Agronomy Journal 78, 441–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, M. P. L. D. & Snaydon, R. W. (1982). Intercropping barley and beans. I. Effects of planting pattern. Experimental Agriculture 18, 139–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ofori, F. & Stern, W. R. (1987). Cereal–legume intercropping systems. Advances in Agronomy 41, 41–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papadakis, J. S. (1941). Small grains and winter legumes grown mixed for grain production. Journal of the American Society of Agronomy 33, 504–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, M. S. & Willey, R. W. (1981). Growth and resource use studies in an intercrop of pearl millet/groundnut. Field Crops Research 4, 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, S. P. (1983). Summer legume intercrop effects on yield and nitrogen economy of wheat in the succeeding season. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 101, 401–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sivakumar, M. V. K. & Virmani, S. M. (1980). Growth and resource use of maize, pigeonpea and maize/pigeonpea intercrop in an operational research watershed. Experimental Agriculture 16, 377–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomar, J. S., MacKenzie, A. F., Mehuys, G. R. & Alli, I. (1988). Corn growth with foliar nitrogen, soil-applied nitrogen, and legume intercrops. Agronomy Journal 80, 802–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trenbath, B. R. (1976). Plant interactions in mixed crop communities. In Multiple Cropping (Eds Papendick, R. I., Sanchez, P. A. & Triplett, G. B.), pp. 129–169. Special Publication No. 27. Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
van Kessel, C., Singleton, P. W. & Hoben, H. J. (1985). Enhanced N-transfer from a soybean to maize by vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal (VAM) fungi. Plant Physiology 79, 562–563.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walkley, A. (1947). A critical examination of a rapid method for determining organic carbon in soils: effect of variations in digestion conditions and of inorganic soil constituents. Soil Science 63, 251–263.Google Scholar
Watanabe, F. S. & Olsen, S. R. (1965). Test of an ascorbic acid method for determining phosphorus in water and NaHCO3 extracts from soil. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 29, 677–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weismantel, M. J. (1992) Food, Gender and Poverty in the Ecuadorian Andes. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Willey, R. W. & Osiru, D. S. O. (1972). Studies on mixtures of maize and beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) with particular reference to plant population. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 79, 517–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willey, R. W. & Reddy, M. S. (1981). A field technique for separating above- and below-ground interactions in intercropping: an experiment with pearl millet/groundnut. Experimental Agriculture 17, 257–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, J. G. & Scott, T. W. (1991). Effects of perennial forage-legume living mulches on no-till winter wheat and rye. Field Crops Research 28, 135–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zadoks, J. C., Chang, T. T. & Konzak, C. F. (1974). A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14, 415–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar