Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T01:11:29.697Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Inheritance of Strength in Wheat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. H. Biffen
Affiliation:
Professor of Agricultural Botany in theUniversity of Cambridge.

Extract

The experiments carried out by the Home Grown Wheat Committee of the National Association of British and Irish Millers have demonstrated the important fact that certain varieties of wheat retain their strength under our conditions. One of the best known of these varieties is Red Fife, the grain of which forms the basis of the graded wheat known as Manitoba Hard. Red Fife has now been tested in this country for six seasons and its strength is still found to be equal to that of the same variety when grown in Canada. Further a somewhat impure stock of the same variety has been cultivated in the Midlands for some sixteen seasons without showing any signs of diminution in strength. As grain of this character is considerably more valuable than that generally grown in this country and as there is a steadily increasing demand for it, the Committee recommended the experimental cultivation of Red Fife in various parts of the country. The results of these trials have shown that in some localities Red Fife will produce more profitable crops than any of the common English wheats, though in others its yield is too small for its profitable cultivation. In spite of very complete returns furnished by growers in most parts of the country it seems impossible at present to state with any precision what the factors are which determine whether it can be grown successfully. Its extended cultivation has also brought out the fact that the straw is not as rigid as the farmer would wish it to be and more than one grower has condemned the variety on this account.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1908

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 87 note 1 Wood, , Journ. Agric. Sci. Vol. II. p. 139.Google Scholar

page 89 note 1 Biffen, , Journ. Agric. Sci. Vol. I. p. 39.Google Scholar

page 90 note 1 The weak parent frequently shows this same flecking of the grain.

page 91 note 1 Report of the Home Grown Wheat Committee, 1905.

page 94 note 1 Biffen, , Journ. Agric. Sci. Vol. I. p. 37.Google Scholar

page 95 note 1 Biffen, , Journ. Agric. Sci. Vol. I. p. 37.Google Scholar

page 96 note 1 Journ. Agric. Sci. Vol. II. p. 201.Google Scholar

page 97 note 1 The analyses were made by Mr S. F. Armstrong of the Agricultural Department of Cambridge University.

page 97 note 2 Saunders, Central Experimental Farms, Report for 1907, p. 35.

page 98 note 1 Saunders, Central Experimental Farms, Report for 1903, p. 21.

page 98 note 2 Univ. Minnesota, Bull. 62, p. 362.

page 100 note 1 Guthrie, , New South Wales Agric. Gaz. Vol. XVII p. 1173.Google Scholar