Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T13:15:32.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Potassium reserves in British soils: II. Soils from different parent materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

O. Talibudeen  and
S. K. Dey
O. Talibudeen
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts.
S. K. Dey
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Twenty-six soils from different parent materials were exhaustively cropped with ryegrass in the glasshouse. Soil and crop measurements revealed inter-relationships similar to those observed with Rothamsted soils (Part I) generally, except that 12 of 20 soils, ‘poor’ in K (as defined by the K intensity of the uncropped soil and the change in soil K intensity with cropping), gave patterns of K uptake by the ryegrass crop similar to those of soils ‘rich’ in K. This indicates that these soils contain some K reserves not differentiated from those accumulated by K-manuring in Rothamsted by laboratory measurements.

The cumulative K yield of ryegrass was very significantly related to the K intensity of the uncropped soil. The relationships were improved slightly by allowing for differences in soil pH and organic carbon content. The cumulative K yields at 16 weeks and at 60 weeks were better related to the total clay (<2 µ) content than to the fine clay (< 0·2 µ) content of the soil. The K intensities of the cropped soils decreased to nearly 10–3 (AR) units after 16 weeks cropping (except the Harwell soil which took 3 years to do so), although large differences in K yield persisted until much later.

Potassium-buffer capacity per unit clay content of the soil (by a laboratory method) was inversely related to the K intensity of the uncropped soil and to K uptakes at 16 and 60 weeks. The rea⋅ons for this apparent anomaly are discussed and a more correct basis for the units for K-buffering capacity is suggested. The buffer capacities of ‘rich’ soils in the laboratory and glasshouse experiments were significantly related but not of ‘ poor ’ soils.

Soils exhausted by cropping released more K to ryegrass after a. drying-and-wetting cycle in amounts proportional to the clay content of the soil. This points to the need for caution in measurements to assess status after air-drying soils.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 71 , Issue 3 , December 1968 , pp. 405 - 411
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arnold, P. W. (1960). Potassium-supplying power of some British soils. Nature, Land. 187, 436–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, P. W. (1962). The potassium status of some English soils considered as a problem of energy relationships. Proc. Fertil. Soc. no. 72, 25–43.Google Scholar
Arnold, P. W. & Close, B. M. (1961b). Release of non-oxchangeable potassium from some British soils cropped in the glasshouse. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 57, 295–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, P. W. & Close, B. M. (1961a). Potassium-releasing power of soils from the Agdell rotation experiment assessed by glasshouse cropping. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 57, 381–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blakemore, M. (1966). Seasonal changes in the amounts of phosphorus and potassium dissolved from soils by dilute calcium chloride solutions. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 66, 139–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, G. (1965). The cation exchange capacity of clinoptilolite. Rep. Rothamsted exp. Stn 1964, pp. 74–5.Google Scholar
Brown, G. (1966). Prediction of release of non-exchangeable potassium to crops. Rep. Rothamsted exp. Stn 1965, pp. 72–3.Google Scholar
Chaussidon, J. (1963). Evolution des caractéristiques chimiques et cristallographiques de montmorillonites biioniques K-Ca, au cours d'alternances répétées d'humeotation-dessication. Proc. Int. Clay Conf., Stockholm 1, 195–201.Google Scholar
Deist, J. & Talibudeen, O. (1967). Thermodynamics of K–Ca ion exchange in soils. J. Soil Sci. 18, 138–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garbouchev, I. (1966). Changes occurring during a year in the soluble phosphorus and potassium in soil under crops in rotation experiments at Rothamsted, Woburn and Saxmundham. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 66, 399–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouse, R. D. & Bertramson, B. R. (1950). Potassium availability in several Indiana soils: Its nature and methods of evaluation. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 14, 113–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. A. & Mathews, B. C. (1957). Release of potassium by 18 Ontario soils during continuous cropping in the greenhouse. Can. J. Soil Sci. 37, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talibudeen, 0. & Dey, S. K. (1968). Potassium reserves in British soils. I. The Rothamsted Classical Experiments. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 71, 95–104.Google Scholar
Talibudeen, O. & Weir, A. (1968) The ‘Harwell’ soil. Rep. Rothamsted exp. Stn. 1967, pp. 53–4.Google Scholar
Vaidyanathas, J. V. & Taubudeen, O. (1965). A laboratory method for the evaluation of nutrient residues in soils. PI. Soil 23, 371–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaidyanathan, L. V. & Talibudeen, O. (1968). Rate processes in the release of soil phosphate. J. Soil Sci. (in the Press).Google Scholar