Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T09:24:14.047Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The reaction of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) cultivars to cucumber mosaic virus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. G. A. Walkey ,
C. M. Ward  and
K. Phelps
D. G. A. Walkey
Affiliation:
National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne, Warwick, GV35 9EF
C. M. Ward
Affiliation:
National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne, Warwick, GV35 9EF
K. Phelps
Affiliation:
National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne, Warwick, GV35 9EF
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

All 53 lettuce cultivars inoculated with cucumber mosaic virus became infected. Leaf mosaic symptoms were generally mild and unreliable for distinguishing degrees of resistance between cultivars. Yield reduction was the most satisfactory criterion for evaluating resistance, with reductions in individual cultivars ranging from 8 to 50%.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 105 , Issue 2 , October 1985 , pp. 291 - 297
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bruckart, W. L. & Lorbeer, J. W. (1975). Recent occurrences of cucumber mosaic, lettuce mosaic and broad bean wilt viruses in lettuce and celery fields in New York. Plant Disease Reporter 59, 203–206.Google Scholar
Bruckart, W. L. & Lorbeer, J. W. (1976). Cucumber mosaic virus in weed hosts near commercial fields of lettuce and celery. Phytopathology 66, 253–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, M. F. & Adams, A. N. (1977). Characteristics of the microplate method of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of plant viruses. Journal of General Virology 34, 475–483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cock, L. (1968). Virus diseases of lettuce. National Agricultural Advisory Service Quarterly Review 79, 126–138.Google Scholar
Francki, R. I. B., Mossop, D. W. & Hatta, T. (1979). Cucumber mosaic virus. Commonwealth Mycological Institute/Association of Applied Biologists, Descriptions of Plant viruses No 213.Google Scholar
Nawrocka, B. Z., Eckenrode, C. J., Uyemoto, J. K. & Young, G. H. (1975). Reflective mulches and foliar sprays for suppression of aphid-borne viruses in lettuce. Journal of Economic Entomology 68, 694–698.Google Scholar
Nelson, M. R. & McKittrick, R. T. (1969). Epidemiology of cucumber mosaic and other virus diseases of lettuce in Arizona. Plant Disease Reporter 53, 27–29.Google Scholar
Provvidenti, R., Robinson, R. W. & Shail, J. W. (1980). A source of resistance to a strain of cucumber mosaic virus in Lactuca saligna L. Horlscience 15, 528–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragozzino, A., Aia, R. & Yafis, G. (1971). I virus patogeni della lattuga in Campania. Rivista Orto-florofrutticoltura Italiana 55, 356–376.Google Scholar
Rodenburg, C. M. (1960). Varieties of lettuce. Varietal Description Nr. 3. Wageningen, Holland: I.V.T.Google Scholar
Thompson, A. D. & Procter, C. H. (1966). Cucumber mosaic virus in lettuce. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 9, 142–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlinson, J. A. (1962). Control of lettuce mosaic by the use of healthy seed. Plant Pathology 11, 61–64.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, J. A., Carter, A. L., Dale, W. T. & Simpson, C. J. (1970). Weed plants as source of cucumber mosaic virus. Annals of Applied Biology 66, 11–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlinson, J. A. & Smith, B. (1961). Lettuce mosaic virus. Report of the National Vegetable Research Station for 1960, p. 49.Google Scholar
Weidemann, H. L. (1977). Untersuchungen zur Anfalligkeit von Salat mosaik virus-resistentem Kopfsalat für Gurkenmosaikund Ackerbohnen-welkevirus. Nachrichten Deutschen Pflanzen 29, 99–101.Google Scholar