Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-07T07:22:26.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relationships between the number of stems produced by a potato seed tuber and its weight

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. C. E. Wurr  and
G. E. L. Morris
D. C. E. Wurr
Affiliation:
National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne, Warwick CV35 9EF
G. E. L. Morris
Affiliation:
National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne, Warwick CV35 9EF
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The relationships between the number of stems per tuber and tuber characters measured before planting were studied using a wide range of tuber weights of the varieties Désirée and Maris Piper. The effects of the storage temperature of the seed tubers and the site of growth on these relationships were then investigated over 3 years.

Linear relationships between the numbers of stems per tuber and tuber weight accounted for more of the variation in numbers of stems than linear relationships established using tuber shape or sprout measurements. The linear relationships had positive slopes and intercepts, showing that small seed tubers produce more stems per unit weight than large seed tubers. There was little evidence of non-linear effects.

On average over all treatments, using ten plant samples, single linear relationships between above-ground stems and tuber weight accounted for 64 % of the variation in above-ground stems with D6sire'e and 58 % with Maris Piper. When separate regression lines were fitted for each treatment the best models in each variety accounted for about 86 % of the variation in above-ground stems. The best model with Désirée had parallel lines showing that the advantage, in terms of stem production, of small seed over large seed increases in environments favouring stem development. The relationships for each treatment are used to show how the stem density established can vary when planting tubers at the recommended spacing.

Seed tubers of comparable weight, planted at different sites, gave different numbers of stems suggesting that the optimum spacing may vary from one site to another.

It is suggested that breeding varieties for yield stability might be aided by selectingfor low variation in the relationship between the number of stems per tuber and tuber weight.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 93 , Issue 2 , October 1979 , pp. 403 - 409
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, E. J. & Wurr, D. C. E. (1973). A comparison of two methods of recording stem densities in the potato crop. Potato Research 16, 10–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthur, J. C. (1892). The potato: relation of the number of eyes on the seed tuber to the product. Bulletin of the Indiana Agricultural Experiment Station No. 42, pp. 105–118.Google Scholar
Bleasdale, J. K. A. (1965). Relationships between set characters and yield in maincrop potatoes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 64, 361–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, R. H. (1977). An assessment of the value of different sizes of seed potatoes of maincrop varieties. Experimental Husbandry 32, 102–114.Google Scholar
Lynch, D. R. & Rowberry, R. G. (1977). Population density studies with Russet Burbank. I. Yield/stem density models. American Potato Journal 54, 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1976). Seedrates for maincrop potatoes. Terrington Experimental Husbandry Farm l§th Annual Review, 1976, pp. 23–26.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1978). Seed rate for maincrop potatoes. Short term leaflet 203, p. 14.Google Scholar
Reestman, A. J. & Wit, C. T. de (1959). Yield and size distribution of potatoes as influenced by seed rate. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 7, 257–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadler, E. M. (1961). Factors influencing the development of sprouts of the potato. Ph.D. thesis, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Schepers, A. & Hoogland, R. F. (1968). Relation between sprout development in seed potatoes and the number of mainstems in the crop. Jaarboek I.B.S. 1968, pp. 47–53.Google Scholar
Sharpe, P. R. & Dent, J. B. (1968). The determination and economic analysis of relationships between plant population and yield of maincrop potatoes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 70, 123–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svensson, B. (1966). Seed tuber – stand – yield. Properties and relationships. Växtodling 21, 1–86.Google Scholar
Toosey, R. D. (1964). The pre-sprouting of seed potatoes: factors affecting sprout growth and subsequent yield. Parts I and II. Field Crop Abstracts 17, 161–168, 239–244.Google Scholar
Whitefield, W. A. D. (1974). The soils of the National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne. Report of the National Vegetable Research Station for 1973, pp. 21–30.Google Scholar
Wurr, D. C. E. (1974). Some effeots of seed size and spacing on the yield and grading of two maincrop potato varieties. 1. Final yield and its relationship to plant population. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 82, 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wurr, D. C. E. (1975). Relationships between sprouting characters and stem development in two maincrop potato varieties. Potato Research 18, 83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar