Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:02:35.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The riboflavin requirement of the White Wyandotte chick

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

W. Bolton
W. Bolton
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture for Northern Ireland and The Queen's University of Belfast
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Literature relevant to the elucidation of the role of riboflavin in chick nutrition is briefly reviewed.

2. A series of experiments on the quantitative requirement of White Wyandotte chicks for riboflavin is described.

3. The riboflavin requirement of White Wyandotte chicks for optimum growth to 6 weeks of age is the same as that for optimum efficiency of food utilization over the same period (3·0 μg. riboflavin per g. food).

4. The riboflavin content for the prevention of curled-toe paralysis is 3·6 μg. per g. food, and is slightly greater than the requirement for optimum growth and food utilization.

5. The curve relating the riboflavin content of the diet to the riboflavin content of the chick's liver has a sigmoid form, and in general tends to lie asymptotically to values of about 26 μg. riboflavin per g. fresh liver when the intake is grossly deficient, and 39 μg. riboflavin per g. fresh liver when the intake is fully adequate.

6. It is suggested that the riboflavin content of the liver may be a more satisfactory criterion of the minimum riboflavin requirement for full well-being than the amounts necessary to secure optimum growth and prevention of curled-toe paralysis.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , October 1944 , pp. 198 - 206
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1944

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bethke, R. M. & Record, P. R. (1942). Poult. Sci. 21, 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bethke, R. M., Record, P. R. & Kennard, D. C. (1931). Poult. Sci. 10, 355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bethke, R. M., Record, P. R. & Wilder, O. H. M. (1937). Poult. Sci. 16, 175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booher, L. E. (1933). J. Biol. Chem. 102, 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsson, E. V. & Sherman, H. C. (1938). J. Nutrit. 15, 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Common, R. H. & Bolton, W. (1942). J. Soc. Chem. Ind., Lond., 61, 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Council on Pharmacy and Chemistry (1937). J.Amer. Med. Ass. 108, 1340.Google Scholar
Hart, E. B., Kletzien, S. W. F., Scott, H. T. & Halpin, J. G. (1930). Poult. Sci. 9, 308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauge, S. M. & Carrick, C. W. (1926). J. Biol. Chem. 69, 403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heuser, G. F., Wilgus, H. S. & Norris, L. C. (1938). Poult. Sci. 17, 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodson, A. Z. (1940). J. Nutrit. 20, 377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, A. G., Guerrant, N. B. & Kempster, H. L. (1925). Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 81. Cited by Norris, L. C., Heuser, G. F. & Wilgus, H. S. (1930). Poult. Sci. 9, 133.Google Scholar
Hogan, A. G., Shrewsbury, C. L. & Kempster, H. L. (1928). J. Agric. Res. 37, 115.Google Scholar
Hunt, C. H., Winter, A. R. & Bethke, R. M. (1939). Poult. Sci. 18, 330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karrer, P. & Euler, H. (1933). Ark. Kemi Min. Geol. 11 B, no. 16. Cited Ann. Rev. Biochem. (1934), 3, 256.Google Scholar
Karrer, P. et al. (1935). Helv. chim. Acta, 18, 1435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karrer, P. (1936). Helv. chim. Acta, 19 E, 33.Google Scholar
Kuhn, R. et al. (1933). Ber. dtsch. chem. Ges. 66 B, 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, R. et al. (1935). Ber. dtsch. chem. Ges. 68, 1765.Google Scholar
Lamoureux, W. F. & Schumacher, A. E. (1940). Poult. Sci. 19, 418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepkovsky, S. & Jukes, T. H. (1936). J. Nutrit. 12, 515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, L. C., Heuser, G. F. & Wilgus, H. S. (1930). Poult. Sci. 9, 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, L. C., Wilgus, H. S., Ringrose, A. T., Heiman, V. & Heuser, G. F. (1936). Bull. Cornell Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 660.Google Scholar
Phillips, P. H. & Engel, R. W. (1938). J. Nutrit. 16, 451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumacher, A. E. & Heuser, G. F. (1941). Poult. Sci. 20, 272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokstad, E. L. R. & Manning, P. D. V. (1938). J. Nutrit. 16, 279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y. L. & Kodicek, E. (1944). Biochem. J. (in the Press).Google Scholar
Wilgus, H. S., Norris, L. C. & Heuser, G. F. (1935). J. Agric. Res. 51, 383.Google Scholar
Williams, R. R. & Cheldelin, V. H. (1942). Science, 96, 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter-Blyth, A. (1879). J. Chem. Soc. 35, 530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar