Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-8l2sj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T05:33:44.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The usefulness and limitations of estimating the number of genes in a barley breeding programme

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

W. Powell ,
P. D. S. Caligari  and
J. L. Jinks
W. Powell
Affiliation:
Scottish Crop Research Institute, Pentlandfield, Roslin, Midlothian, EH25 9RF
P. D. S. Caligari
Affiliation:
Scottish Crop Research Institute, Pentlandfield, Roslin, Midlothian, EH25 9RF
J. L. Jinks
Affiliation:
Genetics Department, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Random inbred lines produced by doubled haploidy and single seed descent have been used to estimate the number of genes or more correctly effective factors (k) controlling quantitative characters in barley. Estimates of k obtained by various biometrical methods are generally an underestimate since the effective factor may be considered a unit only in a temporary sense. In the past, estimates of k have been used to predict the range of inbreds extractable from a cross. Alternative and efficient methods are now available to predict the number of inbreds expected to exceed any given standard. Under these circumstances the need to estimate the number of genes is questionable.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 105 , Issue 2 , October 1985 , pp. 285 - 290
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Caligari, P. D. S., Powell, W. & Jinks, J. L. (1985). The use of doubled haploids in barley breeding. 2. An assessment of univariate cross prediction methods. Heredity (in the Press).Google Scholar
Castle, W. R. (1922). Genetic Studies of Babbits and Rats. Carnegie Institute, Washington. Publication Number 320.Google Scholar
Choo, T. M. & Reinbergs, E. (1982). Estimation of the number of genes in doubled haploid populations of barley (Hordeum vulgare). Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology 24, 337–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croft, J. H. & Simchen, G. (1965). Natural variation among monokaryons of Collybria velutipes. American Naturalist 94, 451–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1946). Statistical Methods for Besearch Workers, 10th edn.Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Jinks, J. L. & Towey, P. (1976). Estimating the number of genes in a polygenic system by genotype assay. Heredity 37, 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasha, K. J. & Kao, K. N. (1970). High frequency haploid production in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Nature, London 225, 874–886.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mather, K. (1949). Biometrical Genetics, 1st edn.London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Mather, K. & Jinks, J. L. (1982). Biometrical Genetics, 3rd edn.London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panse, V. G. (1940). A statistical study of quantitative inheritance. Annals of Eugenics 10, 76–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, W., Thomas, W. T. B., Caligari, P. D. S. & Jinks, J. L. (1985). The effects of major genes on quantitatively varying characters in barley. 1. The GP ert locus. Heredity (in the Press).Google Scholar
Rees, H. & Jones, R. N. (1977). Chromosome Genetics. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Snape, J. W., Wright, A. J. & Simpson, E. (1984). Methods of estimating gene numbers for quantitative characters using doubled haploid lines. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 67, 143–148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tapsell, C. R. (1984) Cross prediction studies on spring barley. Ph. D. thesis, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Towey, P. & Jinks, J. L. (1977). Alternative ways of estimating the number of genes in a polygenic system by genotype assay. Heredity 39, 339–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar