Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:22:59.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The utilization of dietary energy by steers during periods of restricted food intake and subsequent realimentaion

1. The effect of time on the maintenance requirements of steers held at constant live weights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

H. P. Ledger  and
A. R. Sayers
H. P. Ledger
Affiliation:
Animal Production Division
A. R. Sayers
Affiliation:
Statistics Division, East African Agriculture and Forestry Research Organisation, Muguga, P.O. Box 30148, Nairobi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Groups of Bos indicus (Boran) and Bos taurus (Hereford) × Bos indicus steers were kept at constant live weights of 185, 275 and 450 kg for periods of up to 24 weeks. Maintenance of these live weights was achieved by control of the daily ration of a diet having an energy concentration of 10·477 MJ metabolizable energy (ME)/kg d.m. AS time progressed it was noted that less of the diet had to be fed daily to maintain constant live weight. Body composition of steers slaughtered at 0, 12 and 24 weeks showed that the live weights had been maintained by the compensating effect of empty body weight gains and digestive tract content-weight losses.

No significant differences were found between slaughter groups for the energy values of the boneless carcass meat nor the internal deposits of empty digestive tract, omental and mesenteric fat. It was therefore concluded that there had been a progressive increase in the efficiency of energy utilization for the production of edible meat.

The percentage reduction of daily food intake from 3 to 24 weeks necessary to maintain the prescribed live weights ranged from 51·8% for the 185 kg Borans to 17·9% for the 450 kg ¾ Boran × Hereford cross-breds.

Comparison with published estimates for maintenance of live weight showed that after 24 weeks at constant live weight the 185 and 275 kg Borans and the 450 kg ¾ Borans needed 50·5, 37·9 and 34·2% less and the 275 kg Hereford × Boran cross-breds and 450 kg ¾ Herefords 40·8 and 37·9% respectively less food than estimated.

Correction for age effects on the fasting metabolic rates of the 185 and 275 kg weight groups reduced the difference between theoretical and actual maintenance requirements from 50·5, 37·9 and 40·8% to 37·3, 29·3 and 33·8% respectively.

Attention is drawn to the need to differentiate between the live-weight maintenance needs of fast and slow growing animals which may be of similar live weights but differing ages.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 88 , Issue 1 , February 1977 , pp. 11 - 26
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council (1965). The nutrient requirements of farm livestock No. 2. Ruminants. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Alderman, G.Morgan, D. E. & Lessels, W. J. (1970). A comparison of liveweight gains of beef cattle with values predicted from energy intakes measured as starch equivalent or metabolizable energy. In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals (ed. Schürch, A. and Wank, C.), pp. 81–4. E.A.A.P. Publication 13, Published Juris Druck, Zurich.Google Scholar
Allden, W. G. (1968). Undernutrition of the Merino sheep and its sequilae. 1. The growth and development of lambs following prolonged periods of nutritional stress. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 19, 621–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allden, W. G. (1970). The effects of nutritional deprivation on the subsequent productivity of sheep and cattle. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews 40, 1167–84.Google ScholarPubMed
Arnold, G. W., Gkaraybek, H. R., Dodzinski, M. L., McManus, W. R. & Axelsen, A. (1969). Body composition of young sheep. 2. Effect of stocking rate on body composition of Dorset Horn cross lambs. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 72, 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callow, E. H. (1947). Comparative studies of meat. 1. The chemical composition offatty and muscular tissue in relation to growth and fattening. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 37, 113–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnegie, A. B., Tulloh, N. M. & Seebeck, R. M. (1969). Developmental growth and body weight loss of cattle. V. Changes in the alimentary tract. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 20, 405–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denisov, N. (1967). Results of studies on the energy value of rations and the energy requirements of animals. In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals (ed. Blaxter, K. L., Kielanowski, J. and Thorbek, G.), pp. 67–89. Newcastle on Tyne: Oriel Press.Google Scholar
Drew, K. R. & Reid, J. T. (1975). Compensating growth in immature sheep. 1. The effects of weight loss and realimentation on the whole body composition. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 85, 193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsley, F.W.H., McDonald, I.&Fowler, V.R. (1964). The effect of the plane of nutrition on the carcasses of pigs and lambs when variations in fat content are excluded. Animal Production 6, 141–54.Google Scholar
van Es, A.J.H. (1972). Maintenance. In Handbuch der Tierernahrung (ed. Lenkeit, W., Brierem, K. and Crasemann, E.), pp. 1–54. Zweiter band, Leistungen un Ernahrung. Hamburg & Berlin: Paul Parey.Google Scholar
Fox, D. G., Johnson, R. R., Preston, R. L., Dockerty, T. R. & Klosterman, E. W. (1972). Protein and energy utilisation during compensating growth in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 34, 310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gains, W. L. (1943). Journal of Animal Science 2, 301 (cited by van Es, , 1972).Google Scholar
Garrett, W. N. & Hindman, N. (1969). Re-evaluation of the relationship between carcass density and body composition of beef steers. Journal of Animal Science 28, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, W. N., Meyer, J. H. & Lofgreen, G. P. (1959). The comparative energy requirements of sheep and cattle for maintenance and gain. Journal of Animal Science 18, 528–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, N. McC, Searle, T. W. & Griffiths, D. A. (1974). Basal metabolic rate in lambs and young sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 25, 957–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, N. McC. & Searle, T. W. (1975). Studies of weaner sheep during and after a period of weight stasis. 1. Energy and nitrogen utilisation. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 26, 343–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledger, H. P., Gilliver, B. & Robb, J. M. (1973). An examination of sample joint dissection and specific gravity techniques for assessing the carcass composition of steers slaughtered in commercial abattoirs. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 80, 381–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. H. & Clawson, W. J. (1964). Undernutrition and subsequent realimentation in rats and sheep. Journal of Animal Science 23, 214–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, H. H. & Hamilton, T. S. (1929). Bulletin of the Agricultural Experimental Station, University of Illinois, No 323. Urbana, Illinois (cited by van Es, , 1972).Google Scholar
Pomeroy, R. W. (1941). The effect of a sub-maintenance diet on the composition of the pig. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 31, 50–73.Google Scholar
Reid, J. T., Bensadoun, A., Bull, L. S., Burton, J. H., Gleeson, P. A., Han, I. K., Joo, Y. D., Johnson, D. E., McManus, W. R., Paladines, O. L., Stroud, J. W., Tyrell, H. F., Van Niekerk, B. D. H. & Wellington, G. H. (1968). Some peculiarities in the body composition of animals. Body composition in animals and man. National Academy of Science Publication No. 1598, Washington19.Google Scholar
Robertshaw, D. & Katangole, C. B. (1969). Adrenocortical activity and intermediary metabolism of Bos indicus and Bos taurus in the high altitude tropics (2000 m). International Journal of Biometeriology 13, p. 101.Google Scholar
Rogerson, A., Ledger, H. P. & Freeman, G. H. (1968). Food intake and liveweight gain comparisons of Bos indicus and Bos taurus steers on a high plane of nutrition. Animal Production 10, 373–80.Google Scholar
Searle, T. W. & Graham, N. McC. (1975). Studios of weaner sheep during and after a period of weight stasis. 2. Body composition. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 26, 355–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheehy, E. J. & Senior, B. J. (1942). Storing cattle at different levels of nutrition. Journal of the Department of Agriculture, Eire 39, 245–62.Google Scholar
Trowbridge, P. F., Motulton, C. R. & Haigh, L. D. (1915). The maintenance requirement of cattle as influenced by condition, plane of nutrition, age, season, time on maintenance, type and size of animal. University of Missouri, Research Bulletin 18,Columbia, Missouri.Google Scholar
Tulloh, N. M. (1963). The carcass composition of Sheep, cattle and pigs as functions of body weight. Symposium on carcass composition and appraisal of meat animals. CSIBO Publication, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
Webster, A. J. F., Brockway, J. M. & Smith, J. S. (1974). Prediction of the energy requirements for growth in beef cattle. 1. The irrelevance of fasting metabolism. Animal Production 19, 127–39.Google Scholar
Winchester, C. F. & Howe, P. E. (1955). Relative effects of continuous and interrupted growth on beef steers. Technical Bulletin No. 1108, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. N. & Osbourn, D. F. (1960). Compensatory growth and under-nutrition in mammals and birds. Biological Review 35, 324–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar