Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T18:38:45.681Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The value of nitrophosphate fertilizers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. W. Cooke
Affiliation:
Chemistry Department, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts
G. E. G. Mattingly
Affiliation:
Chemistry Department, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts
F. V. Widdowson
Affiliation:
Chemistry Department, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts

Extract

The phosphorus effects of several nitrophosphates were compared with those of superphosphate and dicalcium phosphate in field experiments in 1954 and 1955. In both years immediate effects were measured on radishes, and in 1954 residual effects were measured on a crop of ryegrass which was cut twice.

None of the nitrophosphates tested were more than one-third as efficient as superphosphate for radishes. The residual effects of nitrophosphate (relative to superphosphate) for grass were much larger than their corresponding immediate effects on radish; several materials were as good as superphosphate for increasing the yields of the second cut of grass. The immediate effects of nitrophosphates were much increased by preparing finely ground powders from commercial granulated products.

In both years dicalcium phosphate was equivalent to superphosphate and gave significantly higher yields of radish than any of the granulated nitro-phosphates. At the second cutting of grass in the 1954 experiment there were no significant differences between yields given by dicalcium phosphate and the nitrophosphates.

The solubilities of the phosphorus of nitrophosphates in solutions of citric acid, neutral ammonium citrate, and alkaline ammonium citrate, were of little value in estimating immediate effects of granulated products. It is suggested that physical properties of the granules affect the rate at which phosphate ions can diffuse and so complicate the interpretation of solubility tests.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (1950). Official Methods of Analysis, p. 10, 7th ed.Washington.Google Scholar
Cooke, G. W. (1956 a). J. Agric. Sci. 48, 74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, G. W. (1956 b). The Agricultural Value of Phosphate Fertilisers which Economise in Sulphuric Acid. Paris: Organisation for European Economic Cooperation.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1955). Statutory Instruments 1955, no. 1673. The Fertilisers and Feeding Stuffs Regulations, p. 17.Google Scholar
Mulder, E. G. (1953). Proc. Fert. Soc, no. 25.Google Scholar
O.E.E.C. (1952). Fertilisers, methods of analysis used in O.E.E.C. countries. Paris: Organisation for European Economic Cooperation.Google Scholar
Thorne, D. W., Johnson, P. E. & Seatz, L. F. (1955). Agric. Fd Chem. 3, 136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar