Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:21:11.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of different levels of N, P and K on the yields, nitrogen content and kernel weights of malting barley (var. Proctor)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

T. F. Gately
T. F. Gately
Affiliation:
The Agricultural Institute, Johnstown Castle, Wexford, Ireland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effects of N, P and K applied broadcast on yields, percentage nitrogen and kernel weights of barley were studied over two seasons.

The average yield increase over thirteen sites was 5·1 cwt and 8·2 cwt from applications of 35 lb and 70 lb/acre of fertilizer N respectively. A mean yield increase of 4·4 cwt/acre was obtained from 27 lb P at four sites where the soil phosphorus test did not exceed 2 ppm P. Potassium applied at rates varying from 0 to 168 lb K/acre increased yields at one site only and decreased them at another site.

The mean grain nitrogen percent without fertilizer N was 1·47 and applications of 35 and 70 lb N/acre gave increases of 0·06 and 0·19% respectively. The overall effects of P and K on the percent nitrogen in the grain were small.

Applications of 35 and 70 lb N/acre increased the mean 1000 kernel weights by 0·7 and 1·0 g respectively. When lodging occurred kernel weights were decreased. Fertilizer P and K had little effect on the kernel weights.

The significance of these data are discussed in relation to previous cropping and rainfall during the growing season and during the previous winter.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 70 , Issue 3 , June 1968 , pp. 361 - 367
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Atkins, R. E., Stanford, G. & Dumenil, L. (1955). Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer on yield and malting quality of barley. J. agric. Fd Ghem. 3, 609–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullen, E. R. & Lessells, W. J. (1957). The Effect of nitrogen on cereal yields. J. agric Sci., Camb. 49, 319–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, C. W. & Grunes, D. L. (1958). Effect of fertilization on yields and nutrient content of barley. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 22, 140–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, G. W. (1966). The Control of Soil Fertility. London: Crosby Lockwood and Son Ltd.Google Scholar
Crowther, E. M. & Yates, F. (1941). Fertilizer policy in war time: the fertilizer requirements of arable crops. Emp. J. exp. Agric. 9, 77–97.Google Scholar
Devine, T. R. & Holmes, M. R. J. (1964). Field experiments on the phosphate requirements of spring wheat and barley. Expl Husb. 11, 88–97.Google Scholar
Van Dobben, W. H. (1961). Private communication, Institute of Biology, Wageningen.Google Scholar
Gately, T. F. (1967). Residual effects of sugar beet manuring on yield and nitrogen content of malting barley (var. Proctor). Ir. J. agric. Res. 6, 247–53.Google Scholar
Halliday, D. J. (1960) Nitrogenous manuring of cereals in Great Britain. Jealoti's Hill Res. Stn Bull, no. 10.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. C, Gill, W. D. & Rodger, J. A. B. (1960). The effects of rates and time of application of nitrogenous fertilizer on barley in south-east Scotland. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 54, 291–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, H. (1952). The Barley Crop. London: Crosby Lockwood and Son Ltd.Google Scholar
Hunter, H. (1962). The science of malting barley production. In Barley and Malt (ed. Cook, A. H.), London: Academic Press Inc. Ltd.Google Scholar
Institute Of Brewing (1948). J. Inst. Brew. 54, 188.Google Scholar
Jones, P. J. (1956). A comparison of three varieties of barley at three levels of manuring. Expl Husb. 1, 10–17.Google Scholar
Mobeath, D. K. & Toogood, J. A. (1960). Effect of nitrogen top-dressing on yield and protein content of nitrogen deficient cereals. Can. J. Soil. Sci. 40, 130–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metson, A. J. (1956). Methods of chemical analysis for soil survey samples N.2. Dept. Sci. Ind. Res. Soil Bur., Bull. no. 12, 56–59.Google Scholar
Monthly Weather Reports (1960–1962). Department of Transport and Power, Meteorological Service, Dublin.Google Scholar
Van Der Paauw, F. (1963). Residual effect of nitrogen fertilizer on succeeding crops in a moderate and marine climate. Pl. Soil 19, 324–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peeoh, M. & English, L. (1944). Rapid microchemical soil tests. Soil Sci. 57, 167–95.Google Scholar
Piper, C. S. (1944). Soil and Plant Analyses, pp. 197–201Univ. of Adelaide, Adelaide.Google Scholar
Rayns, F. (1959). Barley. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Resinauer, H. M. & Diokson, A. D. (1961). Effects of nitrogen and sulphur fertilization on yield and malting quality of barley. Agron. J. 53, 192–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strobl, G. (1960). Fertilizing and quality in brewbarley cropping. Phosphorsaure, 20, 154–75.Google Scholar
Widdowson, F. V., Penny, A. & Williams, R. J. B. (1961). Applying nitrogen fertilizers for spring barley. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 56, 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar